similar to: Samba and ADS authentication problems

/[Same as previous mail cause previous filtered and empty]/ Hello all, I recently did some transfer of files located on a samba server to another samba server. To do this I used nautilus from the destination machine to connect to the source computer and initiate the transfer. I realized then that the /date created/ and the /date modified/ info of the transfered files were the same as the

Answering my own question again, after several days of searching I've again found the solution within minutes of posting a question here. The answer to the NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE is that you need to create the /etc/krb5/krb5.keytab file: http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5216293&messageID=9877661 And the windows permission setting problem appears to be due to a lack of

Does anybody have experience of running Samba on a domain and getting inherited file permissions on a Samba server to more closely match the permissions you would see on a Windows 2000 box? I'm trying to reproduce our departmental folders on a Samba box, running on ZFS with NFSv4 ACL's, but I'm struggling to get inherited permissions working properly when new files are created.

Thanks, Galina. It doesn't explain why the test worked on some bots but not this one, but Justin's workaround is okay with me. --paulr From: Galina Kistanova [mailto:gkistanova at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2017 10:09 AM To: Robinson, Paul Cc: Davide Italiano; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Problem with 'sed' on one Windows bot? There is nothing

(2) cause CFI instructions not to emit any .loc directives; done in r289256, plus r289288 (3) file a bug to have someone audit LoopVectorizer.cpp to see whether it is using SetCurrentDebugLocation in the right places; haven't done that part yet (4) reapply my "line 0" patch, which will be the 3rd attempt. r289468 Please ping me when you do (4). Also, will there be a flag to disable

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:50 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > SCE tuning does turn on the .debug_aranges section. Our debugger team > really cares about startup cost. Turnaround time in general is huge for our > licensees, to the point where we support edit-and-continue (minimal > rebuild, live-patch the running process). > Ah, good to know! I'd

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > I've determined that the "pesky" .loc is indeed because of the .cfi > directive that comes immediately after it. Some of the CFI instructions > have source locations, some don't. But, emitting a source location for a > CFI instruction is inappropriate. It's easy enough to

Hmm it looks like getting NPM to work with opt is non-trivial. Only a small portion of the opt functionality works with NPM :( On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:36 PM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > Maybe you could change the default PM in opt and see what fails? > > --paulr > > > > *From:* Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks at google.com> > *Sent:* Monday,

If it's only whitespace differences, that's easy to accommodate. If there are other cases that don't work, maybe don't use this tactic for those, if we have a good reason for being different. As they say, don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. --paulr From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:39 AM To: Rui Ueyama; Robinson, Paul

FYI, I started writing a demangler. I think I can send an initial patch to review in a few days. On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> > wrote: > >> If it's only whitespace differences, that's easy to accommodate. If >> there are other cases

Hello I'd like to try out some functions in the package randomForest. Therefore, I did install this package. However, it is not possible to load the library, although I have R-Version 2.1.1 (i.e. later than 2.0.0). The commands I used and the Answers/Error from R is as follows: > install.packages("C://Programme//R//rw2011//library//randomForest_4.5-16.zip",

Trying 2.1.1p2 on HP-UX 11 (trusted system) I get: Jul 3 14:24:53 robinson sshd[1236]: debug: Encryption type: 3des Jul 3 14:24:53 robinson sshd[1236]: debug: Received session key; encryption turned on. Jul 3 14:24:53 robinson sshd[1236]: debug: Installing crc compensation attack detector. Jul 3 14:24:53 robinson sshd[1236]: debug: Starting up PAM with username "stevesk" Jul 3

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 9:31 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > With AVR being affected, upstreaming a patch to put segment selectors into > .debug_aranges becomes completely reasonable. There would likely want to > be a target hook somewhere to return a value saying what size to use, with > the default implementation returning zero. > *nod* something

Hmmm that is a funny sequence. I know the .cfi directives are represented as pseudo-instructions, but they should not be causing us to emit .loc directives. They have no effect on the .text section so probably they should just be excluded from emitting a location, same as DBG_VALUE is excluded. Also I believe the label there is unnecessary, but that's a separate issue. Regarding "how

On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > I'm not sure why you're stuck on thinking I want an enumeration of > offenses. > Sorry, it's because i don't see a way to give you the below without it :) > What I'm looking for (and AFAICT also Rafael and maybe other people) is a > clearer statement that

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:24 PM, <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Justin Bogner [mailto:justin at justinbogner.com] On Behalf Of Justin > > Bogner > > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 12:16 PM > > To: llvm-dev > > Cc: jdenny.ornl at gmail.com; Robinson, Paul > > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC:

On 1/11/2013 4:04 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Robinson, Paul > <Paul.Robinson at am.sony.com <mailto:Paul.Robinson at am.sony.com>> wrote: > > I'd ask that it be made target-dependent, as I don't want it > (and apparently few do, which is why it was removed). > > > No worries there, it can be put under a flag

From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 4:15 PM To: Robinson, Paul Cc: Clang Dev; LLDB Dev; LLVM Dev; Reid Kleckner; llvm-foundation at lists.llvm.org Subject: RE: [cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] Sequential ID Git hook On 30 Jun 2016 10:20 p.m., "Robinson, Paul" <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > We've since stopped creating

I uploaded a FYI patch (not intended for submission) as https://reviews.llvm.org/D34667. If you want to take a look and comment on its design, please do so. Thanks! On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > Please add me on reviews. BTW, even differing in whitespace might cause > problems, I know their tools have some builtin assumptions about

On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 11:59 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > Welcome Sourabh, > > > > There are many bits of DWARF-5 that haven’t been implemented. > Got a short list, by chance? > I know there is currently no big push within Sony to “fill in the > corners” for v5, as we have been more focused on quality of debug info for > optimized