similar to: Default Posix ACLs not honoured

Hi. samba 4.1.1.. User has unix rights for writing, but samba denies write access to him. On samba server: amistest at samba:~$ id uid=6603(amistest) gid=20(users-nis) groups=20(users-nis),2108(evis),2109(slp),2112(hernie),2126(poj),2133(hto),20000(users) -> user amistest is in "poj" group amistest at samba:~$ ls -ld ACLTEST drwxrwxr-x+ 2 hrubos vema 4096 Nov 27 11:05 ACLTEST

Hi list, I have a weird problem. Im using samba 3.0.24 in ADS mode against a 2003 server. If I put admin users = @"KIC\Domain Users" I can connect with all users in that group. If I remove admin users and instead use valid users = @"KIC\Domain Users" I receive the following error Domain=[KIC] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.24] tree connect failed:

I thought I had read a response to this. Went something like this: Word (and lots of others such apps) do not actually deal with the original file. They create a temporary file which overwrites the original when you save the new document. The 'new' file of course inherits the new editor's ownership. Hope this helps you. Noel -----Original Message----- From: Josh Konkol

Hi, I recently tried to use ACLs with samba. XFS is running, I can set ACLs using setfacl and read them with getfacl, no problem so far. Samba compiled fine with '--with-acl-support'. Now I set up a share with 'nt acl support = yes', put there a file and added an acl with 'setfacl': root@edjo[ACLTEST]# getfacl datei.txt # file: datei.txt # owner: odenbach # group:

Am 10.10.18 um 10:27 schrieb Peter Milesson via samba: > > On 10/9/18 10:41 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 22:16:41 +0200 >> Peter Milesson <miles at atmos.eu> wrote: >> >>> >>> On 09.10.2018 21:25, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 19:44:55 +0200 >>>> Peter Milesson via samba

On 05/01/15 14:59, James wrote: > That is actually the wiki page I am currently referencing in my > question. From the wiki you can see the 'Everyone' group. I would > normally remove and add domain users or authenticated users. That > prompted me to ask myself "what if I wanted the everyone group to have > access"? How does the member server know who the

Hi, Been using rsync for many years but I'm stuck with this problem. I'ts a simplistic backup using rsync from a Windows 2k3 machine to a Linux box out on the 'net, using pre-shared ssh keys. In this case I'm saving, files belonging to various users, using the administrator account on the windows machine and the destination is a normal user account and its home file area.

On 10/08/15 20:51, Andrew Martin wrote: > I have a samba share (using Samba 3.6.3) running on an ext4 filesystem with the > "acl" mount option. The samba share is configured as follows: > [myshare] > path = /srv/myshare > browseable = no > public = no > guest ok = no > writable = yes > printable = no > create mode = 0660 >

Im not saying anything but having a GID on "domain admins" works fine. For me then since 2014.. getent group "domain admins" domain admins:x:10001:admin,administrator Can you post the output of ls -ald /data/samba What happens when you do this. chmod 1777 /data/samba/profiles or 3777, but that opens access for "domain users" to the users profiles folders. But

I have a samba share (using Samba 3.6.3) running on an ext4 filesystem with the "acl" mount option. The samba share is configured as follows: [myshare] path = /srv/myshare browseable = no public = no guest ok = no writable = yes printable = no create mode = 0660 directory mode = 0770 level2 oplocks = no oplocks = no I have configured the following ACLs on

On Tuesday 01 September 2009 12:11:39 Thomas Leuxner wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:34:16AM +0200, Andreas Ntaflos wrote: > > Is there anything more to it? I ask, because I can't seem to get it > > to work correctly using this approach with global ACLs. Problems > > include: > > > > - Can't get the mailboxes "Spam" and "Ham" under

Hi list, I am having trouble getting global ACLs to work correctly. This is, I assume, an issue separate from the one I reported a few days ago [1], where the imap process crashes when creating subfolders of folders with an ACL set. As you can see from my 'dovecot -n' output below I have three namespaces; two private ("Backup" and the default, empty one) and one public

Hi Rowland, sorry, I hit the wrong reply button in the last answer. So there is no other way than to use Windows ACLs? I was told with our old systems (Samba 3 in non-domain mode) the behaviour I want to achieve was possible when only using ugo. Greetings, Felix -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von Rowland Penny Gesendet:

On 2019-07-27T07:59:56 +0200 Francis.Montagnac at inria.fr wrote: > > Try: > > rsync -avz --delete-after --delay-updates --partial /A/ www2.example.com:/B/ > > The man indicate also for --delay-updates: > > See also the "atomic-rsync" perl script in the "support" subdir > for an update algorithm that is even more atomic (it

Here is the requested config: [global] workgroup = workgroup netbios name = server server string = %h server wins support = yes dns proxy = no name resolve order = host wins lmhosts bcast interfaces = 127.0.0.0/8 192.168.1.1 smb ports= 445 139 bind interfaces only = yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m log level = 1 max log size = 1000

permissions for each entry. It is also possible to delete an entry. BUT: I cannot add an entry. If I add a user to the list and submit the changes, the added entry disappears again and I only see the entries I had before. In the logs I found the following lines: [2002/09/11 11:14:03, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(823) create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID

Given the config provided as requested, any clues? TIA 23.03.2017 20:26, PF4Public via samba wrote: > Here is the requested config: > > [global] > workgroup = workgroup > netbios name = server > server string = %h server > wins support = yes > dns proxy = no > name resolve order = host wins lmhosts bcast > interfaces = 127.0.0.0/8

It looks like this is a long known issue: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10792 On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Sergei Gerasenko <gerases at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I know this has been discussed ad naseum, but I can't find an answer to my > question precisely. > > My version of samba is 4.2.10. > > Here's my question. I have

Hello, everybody. I have a problem with group permissions. On a Linux server (where I use Samba 3.0.28 under Fedora Core 8) there is the "classical" share for home directories. And everything works just fine, as always did, when I access my home directory from a Windows XP client. In my home directory I have a symbolic link to another directory (that I do not own, but for which I have

Hi List, I'm observing a strange problem on 2.6.9 (no opportunity to upgrade on both ends yet). Receiver is linux, sender is cygwin. I transferred a 6GB file (an MS SQL .bak file) physically from one site to the other, in order to get the first "backup" done. In the meantime, the sender generated a new file, which I know for a fact to be very similar to the manually transferred