similar to: CTDB and LDAP

Hi there, I am looking into using CTDB between a PDC and a BDC. I assume this is possible! However I have a few questions: 1: Do I have to use tdb2 as an Idmap backend? Can I not stay with ldap? (from the CTDB docs: A clustered Samba install must set some specific configuration parameters clustering = yes idmap backend = tdb2 private dir = /a/directory/on/your/cluster/filesystem It is

On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Avinash Rao <avinash.aol at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Alex Crow<acrow at integrafin.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> Alex, > >> > >> I have been trying to use "root preexec" to add domain users to Power > >> users group on the local workstation, it never works.. > >> >

Hi, I'm trying to access the IMAP archives with Thunderbird but can't seem to get it to work. I have tried an unencrypted connection, SSL and TLS but with no success. Any ideas? Thanks Alex -- This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential information. Unless you are that person, you may not disclose its contents or use it in any way and are requested

Hi Timo, Is it OK to have dovecot variables in entries in an LDAP userdb? Say I wanted to set the mail userdb parameter to override mail_location, would it work by having an entry in LDAP (eg for mailMessageStore attrib) like: mdbox:/home/email/%d/%n:INDEX=/home/indexes/%d/%1n/%n:ALT=/home/email_archive/%d/%1n/%n and those % variables will still be expanded by dovecot? Or would I be required

All, If I set up a BDC with a replicated ldap server, can I point the "ldap backend" and "idmap backend" options *both* to the localhost and enable a referral on the slave so that writes (ie Idmap updates) will be referred to the master server? I'm running debian unstable with openldap 2.4 (and libs) and Samba 3.0.30. I know I should use the new idmap interface but this

I have the same problem as the following: http://threebit.net/mail-archive/asterisk-users/msg36602.html I am using a b410p (Wildcard) in TE mode on 4 channels of ISDN2e and it totally fails to detect incoming DTMF. The newer mISDN drivers have a parameter "dtmfthreshold" where you can tune the volume above which DTMF detection is initiated. However (I've tried it) the newest

Hi all, Just to clarify, if we back up a dovecot 2 server with SIS for attachments and ALT storage by rsyncing it (including the SIS and ALT storage) to a remote server when it's idle (or at least almost entirely so), and run dovecot on that machine, would it seem feasible to restore backups from that server by using dysnc - specifically for the scenario where someone accidentally

Hi all, Since the winbind refactoring in Samba 3.6.0, interdomain trusts between Samba servers seem to be broken in that being able to resolve or modify file permissions on the other domain work only very intermittently (eg about once out of 10 tries). This is regardless of whether I use idmap_rid or idmap_ldap as the backend. I set up two 3.6.0 domain controllers with an XP client attached

Hi, everyone, I setup two-node samba cluster with ctdb and glusterfs. When one node fails, another node can takeover ip and cifs sessions, so application can not breaks. Linux cifs client works fine when disable one node. However, it does not work under windows xp. I am copying a big file to samba share, meanwhile I disable the connected node, then copy break with "The specified network

Hi, I have recently upgraded a system with a Samba BDC, PDC and a couple of member servers from 3.2.14 to 3.4.9 (and also tested with 3.5.6). There appears to be some problem with Winbind (we need to run it on all servers as we have a trust relationship to a domain at another office). I have an Idmap range set up in our LDAP database. With 3.2.14, all worked well. The Idmap ou would be

I'm currently hacking on CTDB's IP takeover/failover code. For Samba 4.6, I would like to rationalise the IP takeover-related tunable parameters. I would like to know if there are any users who set the values of these tunables to non-default values. The tunables in question are: DisableIPFailover Default: 0 When set to non-zero, ctdb will not perform failover or

Hi guys, I try to set up two identical installed up to date CentOS6 machines with Glusterfs/CTDB/Samba . I have set up Glusterfs and it works. I have set up CTDB from CentOS and it seems to work too. Samba is AD integrated and works mainly. The main problem is that file locking seem to not work between the machines at all. If two Win7 clients try to open an document from the same Samba server

On 03/07/16 21:47, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 08:42:36PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: >> I've only put the "private dir" onto MooseFS, as instructed in the CTDB >> docs. > Can you quote these docs, so that we can correct them? Here, under the lustre section. I applied the same config at it's a similar FS (ie distributed with a central metadata

I did a new rsync and compiled ctdb new. This version did not establish a new config file!!!: /etc/sysconfig/ctdb. I had to use my old one. After starting ctdb recognizing that ctdb wants his state directory in /usr/local/var/ctdb/state I could not fix that in /etc/sysconfig/ctdb file. So I had do mkdir /usr/local/var/ctdb manually. After starting ctdb on both nodes all nodes rest unhealthy. And

On 03/07/16 21:47, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 08:42:36PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: >> I've only put the "private dir" onto MooseFS, as instructed in the CTDB >> docs. > Can you quote these docs, so that we can correct them? > > Also Gluster have the same tip here:

Hi 2 node ctdb 2.5.3 on Ubuntu 14.04 nodes apparmor teardown and firewall and stopped dead The IP takeover is working fine between the nodes: Jul 21 14:12:03 uc1 ctdbd: recoverd:Trigger takeoverrun Jul 21 14:12:03 uc1 ctdbd: recoverd:Takeover run starting Jul 21 14:12:04 uc1 ctdbd: Takeover of IP 192.168.1.81/24 on interface bond0 Jul 21 14:12:04 uc1 ctdbd: Takeover of IP 192.168.1.80/24 on

On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 2:52 AM Martin Schwenke <martin at meltin.net> wrote: > Hi Bob, > > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 06:55:31 -0400, Robert Buck <robert.buck at som.com> > wrote: > > > And so we've been rereading the doc on the public addresses file. So it > may > > be we have gravely misunderstood the *public_addresses* file, we never > read > >

Hi, We have just managed to get winbind behaving correctly in a Samba domain with Samba member servers with help from Sernet. It is now not adding spurious entries for the "own domain". However, a member server keeps trying to add group mappings that already exist in the LDAP idmap ou. This would not be a problem, apart from the fact that every time it fails adding an entry, the

How can I check if a client has used the pdc or one of the bdc's for domain logon? regards martin

Hi Bob, On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 06:55:31 -0400, Robert Buck <robert.buck at som.com> wrote: > And so we've been rereading the doc on the public addresses file. So it may > be we have gravely misunderstood the *public_addresses* file, we never read > that part of the documentation carefully. The *nodes* file made perfect > sense, and the point we missed is that CTDB is using