similar to: secrets.tbd and ldap - migrating from one samba domain to another

Hello, I don't know if this is the correct channel to ask questions about samba configuration errors so I apologize if it is not. I recently installed samba 2.2.2 on an IRIX 5.3 machine and everytime I run the command smbpasswd -j <DOMAIN> I receive the error: tdb(/usr/local/samba/private/secrets.tdb): tdb_oob len 1111638618 beyond eof at 8192 Unable to write the machine account

Hello, I'm reposting a previous problem that got off the mailing list. I'm now using samba-2.2.4 but still on an IRIX 5.3 machine. When I preform: smbpasswd -j <DOMAIN> I receive the error: tdb(/usr/local/samba/private/secrets.tdb): tdb_oob len 1111638618 beyond eof at 8192 Unable to write the machine account password for machine <Server NetBIOS name> in domain

I am trying to integrate a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 server into our Windows 2003 domain. I was able to successfully join it to our domain, but the WBINFO commands keep failing when I start SMB and WINBIND. I looked at the log files and found this interesting entry in the /var/log/samba/winbindd.log file: [2006/11/29 21:49:11, 1] nsswitch/winbindd.c:main(864) winbindd version 3.0.10-1.4E.9

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We're power failing a unit before it goes into production, and we've noticed that every time we fail it during a data transfer, smbd loses the domain connection. I've traced it down to the secrets.tdb file. After a power failure, tdbdump secrets.tdb says: { key = "SECRETS/SID/IN28C29E" data =

We have two solaris 9 boxes with Samba 3.0.20, which authenticate against a solaris 8 box with Samba 2.2.8a. My question is about the /usr/local/samba/private files secret.tbd and smbpasswd. We initially copied the smbpasswd from the 2.2.8a to the newer ones, but it is not often kept up to date. I was getting ready to work on setting up CFENGINE to keep the files in sync when I was just told

Hey guys, For some reason, when I enable smb and nmb to start at boot time... I get error messages in my log.smbd. [2008/02/01 18:47:00, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(1153) Connection to LDAP server failed for the 1 try! [2008/02/01 18:47:04, 1] lib/smbldap.c:another_ldap_try(1153) Connection to LDAP server failed for the 2 try! From this you'd think that either I hadn't

Hi, We're running dovecot 2.2.13, virtual users, with postfix. We have an olddomain and a new domainname. To 'translate' *@olddomain into *@newdomain, I have configured: > cat /etc/postfix/canonical > @olddomain.com @newdomain.com While this seems to work, lately we have noticed that dovecot occasionally creates mailboxes for non-existent users, like: >

Thanks again Rowland for getting back to me.  Here's my comments below: >> /etc/hosts: >> 127.0.0.1       localhost >> 192.168.0.17    ad.domain.intranet ad >> 192.168.0.21    domain-ad.domain.intranet     domain-ad > > Remove the line above, this is the old AD domain and shouldn't have > anything pointing to the new one. Have deleted this line. 

On 8/23/2017 2:53 PM, mj wrote: > > On 08/23/2017 06:03 PM, Noel wrote: >> Don't use wildcard aliases.? They break recipient validation and >> cause postfix to accept all addresses. >> >> Instead use 1-1 aliases, such as >> user1 at olddomaon? user1 at newdomain >> user2 at olddomaon? user2 at newdomain > > But we have 500+ addresses in ldap,

Hello friends, I am trying to test NAS I/O performance over a network and trying to see the numbers for write and read speed. I have successfully configured and ran a lot of tests. However the numbers have not increased, I have reached a bottleneck. I tried playing around with the smb.conf file including all possible variations like, socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=(tried values like

Here's the situation. We've got an old NT4 domain (not a Samba domain in NT 4 mode) which we'll call CRUSTY. There is of course an NT4 PDC and several NT4 BDCs. We have some Linux/Samba file servers (Samba 3.0.1) that are member servers (security = domain) of the NT4 domain. We also have several NT4 BDCs and about 200 workstations of varying vintage (2000, XP) in several

while in firefox if i use arrow keys in text fields, it acts very oddly. starting at the beginning of the line it works fine for a few characters and then jumps to the end of the line. backarrow jumps backwards from the end of line to within a few chars of the beginning. anyone else seeing this?

On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 19:16:51 +0200 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! Havany via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > >> It sounds like you are still using the old, deprecated (by Windows) > >> roaming profiles, instead of Folder redirection. > > ?! Some more clue, Rowland? I use roaming profiles *AND* folder >

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-176.html refers: This update has been rated as having critical security impact by the CentOS Security Response Team. The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: firefox-1.0.1-1.4.3.centos4.1.i386.rpm You may update you CentOS-4 i386 installations by running the command: yum upgrade Thanks Johnny Hughes

Hi all, I wonder if using a per-user sieve_before setting (ie: a relative path to user home, as ~/filter.sieve) is expected to work corretly. Full disclaimer: I am migrating an old CentOS 6.10 box with dovecot 2.0.9 and an old pigenhole version. I now want to redirect emails from old account to new account (I have a csv with old->new address pairs). My first approach using a single, big

Hi, When installing Samba, I made it a PDC in a new domain. Now I would like the old NT4 PDC in the old domain to become a plain host in my Samba domain. Is this possible? I need to keep the old NT4 machine because it's running the Symantec Corporate Edition NAV. In other words, I have NEWDOMAIN with Samba PDC and all clients OLDDOMAIN with NT4 PDC alone, no client Can my NT4 PDC become

On 8/23/2017 4:30 AM, lists wrote: > Hi, > > Not sure what the lack of replies means... As postfix is also > involved, should I better ask there? > > It seems a little bit in between postfix and dovecot... > > Just to clearify one thing I wrote: > > On 22-8-2017 16:23, lists wrote: >> We're running dovecot 2.2.13, virtual users, with postfix. We >>

Hi, On one of my servers (old one, version 1.2.5) user reported that vacation message for basic address works fine, but not for the aliases. I know that this is an old version, but we can't simply switch them to the most current dovecot release without preparing and testing everything... So I'm rather asking for help with debugging the case :) This person has email my.name at

have a strange isue. [ this is my 2nd day with centos4] nice instalatin BTW ok, i activated cupsd sharing and open the port 631 in the security level when i lpq from withing a network interface i get thi error ~$ lpq lpq: error - no default destination available. and in centos the log shows D [19/Mar/2006:08:37:17 -0500] AcceptClient: 8 from 192.168.1.100:631. D [19/Mar/2006:08:37:17 -0500]

Hello everyone, I got a question, I'm not new in the linux scene or even a geek, but I am confused about certain stuff regarding Bind, DNS stuff, or whatsoever, maybe it's a silly question. Anyway. About 3 years ago I hired a dedicated server in certain company, for hosting my site and some other sites, didn't work at all the plan I had, nevertheless I was using Redhat 9 or something