similar to: samba 3.28 freebsd and locking not available

Hello, I'm running centos5 with the centosplus kernel v2.6.18-8.1.8.el5 and i'm trying to read a drive that has a ufs2 partition on it. It was originally in a FreeBSD machine and has some data i'd like to get at. Googling indicated this should work with the command: mount -r -t ufs -o ufstype=ufs2 <device> <mountpoint> device is /dev/hdb5 and mountpoint is /mnt.

We're having problems with FreeBSD 5.4, 6.0, and 6.1 and an ICP Vortex GDT8546RZ 4 port SATA RAID card in a Tyan S2460 system with dual AMD Athlon MP 1600+ CPUs. We do not have any problems with this configuration under FreeBSD 4.11, and we have the same ICP cards in Tyan based Opterion system (S2882 and S4882) run with out problems under FreeBSD 5.4 and 6.1. We can reproduce the problem on

I wouldn't report this if not for one coincidence (which is described below). I have too little facts, so this is more of a mystery problem tale than a real problem report. There are two systems: 1. old, slow, i386, UP, 7-STABLE 2. new, fast, amd64, MP, 6.3-RELEASE Systems are located at different physical locations. What is common between them: 1. they both have the same backup strategy

Hi, Currently streaming ogg isn't practical in this situation. That was one of the first things i checked into. WHen i looked i didn't see a streamer that did both ogg and mp3. Thanks. Dave. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Ballenger" <lpmusix@gmail.com> To: "Dave" <dmehler26@woh.rr.com> Cc: <icecast@xiph.org> Sent: Friday, December

Hi all, I am playing with a test box at the moment running a Samba 2.2.7a domain on FreeBSD 5.0. I wish to enable ACLs, but I am not exactly sure what I am supposed to expect once they are enabled. I have created a UFS2 partition and enabled ACL support using tunefs. Since doing that, I have been able to connect to the Samba shares and modify ACLs, but so far the only things I have been able to

One line summary: Too many files in a top-level UFS-2 filesystem directory will cause a panic on mount. Kern/Critical/High Priority/SW-Bug Which FreeBSD Release You Are Using: 6.3-STABLE Environment (output of "uname -a" on the problem machine): FreeBSD wahoo.sd67dfl.org 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #0: Sun Feb 10 21:13:39 CST 2008

One line summary: Too many files in a top-level UFS-2 filesystem directory will cause a panic on mount. Kern/Critical/High Priority/SW-Bug Which FreeBSD Release You Are Using: 6.3-STABLE Environment (output of "uname -a" on the problem machine): FreeBSD wahoo.sd67dfl.org 6.3-STABLE FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE #0: Sun Feb 10 21:13:39 CST 2008

Hello, Does anyone have a guide for setting up an nfs server for unattended deployment of centos5? Basically what i want to do is boot a system from CD media, pass a boot parameter nfs, and ks= options then walk away, the box goes out to the nfs server, finds the kickstart file, reads, and does it. I've got several machines and i'd rather not do manual installs. Thanks. Dave.

Thanks for the help on the missing '-p1' for the acl and xattr patches. Things are configuring and making properly now. However, I couldn't help noticing this during the configure: checking whether to support ACLs... ACLs requested -- running tests checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no checking for ACL support... yes checking ACL test results... Using posix ACLs checking for

Hello, I hope this is the right place to ask this one. I've got a FreeBSD 6.2 machine acting as an nfs server. It's exporting a home directory to several machines. On the server that home directory has a symlink in it to another directory on the filesystem. As long as users are on the server they can view the directory symlinked to, but if viewing through samba, they're

Hello, I'm trying to set up centos 5.1 to authenticate against an openldap server. I've got the authentication working, in that i can log in as a user contained within the ldap database but not in the system passwd/group files. The problem is instead of a prompt that for example looks like this: (username)@hostname:~/$ i'm getting this: (I have no name)@hostname:~/$

Hi Genec, On Sun, May 25, 2014 11:27 am, Gene Cumm wrote: > Raphael/Paulo: does UFS2 have a hard 64kiB limit? I know it's not > installed to the first sector where the first superblock is located. I have no much experience with UFS2 filesystem. I've just took a quick look at its internals and I can see that UFS2 places its superblock at either 64KiB or 256KiB (depending on the

Hello again, I sent in this error a couple weeks ago and one person (eric) kindly responded and tried to help, but to no avail. Any one else have any ideas on the following: A couple years ago I installed Samba 2.2.0 on our HP9000 running HPUX 10.20. I am now trying to install it on a customer's HP9000 (also using 10.20) and executing the configure command produces the "No locking

Hello, Getting during configure the infamous error: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe solaris I went into tests folder and tried summary.c. It fails with the above error. I tried to make the fcntl_lock manually like it tries and got the following: root@raven:/usr/local/samba/source/tests #gcc -m32 -o fcntl_lock fcntl_lock.c fcntl_lock.c: In function `main':

For archiving from source media (CD usually) to flac? I typically use EAC either from Windows or Wine as it allows for the most configuration. Off the top of my head I think Sound Juicer will do it for *nix, though there are probably others that work just as well. Chris Dave wrote: > Hi, > Thanks. As is usually the case circumstances kind of put this > project on a few days hold,

Hello Samba folks, A couple years ago I installed Samba 2.2.0 on our HP9000 running hpux 10.20. I am now trying to install it on a customer's HP9000 and am getting the error "No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe" while executing the configure command. I got that error a couple years ago and resolved it by linking /usr/bin/cc and /opt/ansic/bin/cc but that is not

It's needed to enumerate both UFS1/2 since they have different magic numbers and super block offsets. Besides, UFS2 can be installed in the 0-64k range like BTRFS, whereas UFS1 can't. UFS2 has no cow feature unlike BTRFS. Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> --- extlinux/main.c | 79 ++++++++++--- extlinux/ufs.h | 26 ++++

Hello, I've got a FreeBSD 6 machine running icecast2 and ices0streaming four different streams of mp3's. Now i have a need to stream the same content as either aac+ or ogg vorbis whichever would be easiest to set up and give the best quality. I want these new streams to handle both broadband and dialup users without sacrificing quality. My problem is i really really do not want to

On Fri, 12 Jul, at 08:31:27PM, Raphael S.Carvalho wrote: > @@ -575,7 +594,7 @@ bail: > return 1; > } > > -/* btrfs has to install the ldlinux.sys in the first 64K blank area, which > +/* btrfs/ufs2 has to install the ldlinux.sys in the first 64K blank area, which > is not managered by btrfs tree, so actually this is not installed as files. > since the cow

It's needed to enumerate both UFS1/2 since they have different magic numbers and super block offsets. Besides, UFS2 can be installed in the 0-64k range like BTRFS, whereas UFS1 can't. Signed-off-by: Raphael S.Carvalho <raphael.scarv at gmail.com> --- extlinux/main.c | 71 +++++++++--- extlinux/ufs.h | 26 ++++ extlinux/ufs_fs.h | 307