similar to: Standalone Server with Wins -- Password Not Required on Win/XP

I tried adding "guest ok = no" in the [homes] section below and got the same results. On first access from a WinXP Client, the system requests a userid and password. If you provide a userid and password, the system will Not allow you to view the shares. The only way (that I've found) to get passed this is to provide the userid Only -- this allows access to a window that contains

Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> writes: > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola < > rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Martin Richtarsky <s at martinien.de> writes: >> >> > Output looks as follows [1] Seems sh_offset is missing? >> >> That is what readelf prints as Off >> >> > [17] .rela.text

---------------------------------------- > Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:15:02 -0700 > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] question about alignment of structures on the stack (arm 32) > From: t.p.northover at gmail.com > To: alexey.perevalov at hotmail.com > CC: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > >> I'm using MachO loader (https://github.com/LubosD/darling/). I'm trying to make it work on

---------------------------------------- > Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 07:09:47 -0700 > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] question about alignment of structures on the stack (arm 32) > From: t.p.northover at gmail.com > To: alexey.perevalov at hotmail.com > CC: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; lubos at dolezel.info > >>> By default almost all ELF platforms use an ABI called AAPCS (either

Dear community, I faced with code which was generated by llvm, assembly instructions of that code is relying on 8-bytes alignment for structures on the stack. The part of Objective C code is following: -(void)getCharacters:(unichar *)unicode {     NSRange range;     range.location = 0;     range.length = [self length];     printf("%p, %p\n", &range.location, &range.length); And

Hello Tim, thanks for response ---------------------------------------- > Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 11:45:03 -0700 > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] question about alignment of structures on the stack (arm 32) > From: t.p.northover at gmail.com > To: alexey.perevalov at hotmail.com > CC: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > > On 20 April 2015 at 11:09, Alexey Perevalov > <alexey.perevalov at

Hello R-listers, I'm having trouble accessing "sub" objects ("attributes"?), e.g., "x$silinfo$avg.width" using the /get() /command; I'm using/ get()/ in a loop as illustrated in the following code: #FIRST MAKE CLUSTERS of VARYING k /for (i in 1:300){ assign(paste("x.",i,sep=""),pam(x,i)) #WORKS FINE }/ #NEXT, TAKE LOOK AT AVE.

Hello, I'm somewhat new to R. I've searched the archive for the last year and tried to consult the manual pages for the following problem, but did not find an answer. I want to sort an array by the index values. Here is the array >acc.gp.bl.wtmn Gp17 Gp4 1 0.5703125 0.6406250 10 0.7812500 0.7109375 11 0.8046875 0.7343750 12 0.8359375 0.7890625 13 0.8515625 0.7109375

Hello R-community: Much of the time I want to use loops to look at graphs, etc. For example, I have 25 plots, for which the names are m.1$medoids, m.2$medoids, ..., m.25$medoids. I want to index the object number (1:25) as below (just to show concept). for (i in 1:25){ plot(m.i$medoids) } I've tried the following, with negative results for ...

---------------------------------------- > Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 09:33:58 -0700 > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] question about alignment of structures on the stack (arm 32) > From: t.p.northover at gmail.com > To: alexey.perevalov at hotmail.com > CC: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; lubos at dolezel.info > >>> void func(int x, long long y) >>> >>> iOS will pass y in

Hello, I have a simple problem (checked the archives and the appropriate help pages, to no avail). I want to creat a vector that is length(2000). The vector is to consist of two strings( "std" and "dev") with 1760 "std"s and 240 "dev"s. Furthermore, for each element of the vector, i want the selection of one of the strings to be approx. random. The

Several different PAM modules relating to Samba exist. The ones I could find were as follows: pam_smb http://www.csn.ul.ie/~airlied/pam_smb/ Authenticates against an NT domain controller, without joining the domain. (Doesn't work with Active Directory.) pam_ntdom http://www.cb1.com/~lkcl/pam-ntdom/ Based on the above, authenticates against an NT domain. Requires the client to be added to

The ARM has some very powerful and complex addressing modes. For example, the data processing instructions (and, orr, add, ..) have an addressing mode that has 11 options (imm, reg, and 9 reg + some shift). I am considering 3 ways to implement this: 1) define one instruction that has an ARM specific addressing mode that covers all 11 possibilities. 2) define 11 instructions. 3) a mix of the two

Sorry, I pasted the wrong file in earlier... this is the correct one: pValCalculator(b, n=20, m=20) { ind <- 1:min(c(n,m)) prob <- (1-pnorm(b,sd=std*sqrt(ind))) prob1 <- sum((n-ind+1)*(m-ind+1)*prob) prob1 } inputData <- scan("/users/lvssso/projects/LAMA/output/pValLamaScore.tmp", list(block1 = "",block2 = "",width1 = 0,width2 = 0,alignment = 0,score

Preamble -------- While working on an IR-level optimisation completely unrelated to register allocation I happened to trigger some really strange register allocator behaviour causing a large regression in bzip2 in spec2006. I've been trying to fix that regression before getting the optimisation patch committed, because I don't want to regress spec2006, but I'm basically fumbling in

Hello everyone, I've added the "S" suffixed versions of ARM and Thumb2 instructions to tablegen. Those are, for example, "movs" or "muls". Of course, some instructions have already had their twins, such as add/adds, and I leaved them untouched. Besides, I propose the codegen optimization based on them, which removes the redundant comparison in patterns like orr

Hi R community, I have a question concerning passing arguments between apply and lapply? Or maybe, once my problem is explained, the question is really about how to best transform my nested for loops into list/matrix operations; I am just beginning this transformation away from nested for loops, so I beg of you to have some lenience regarding my ignorance. Part I: I used a set of nested for

Hi Rafael, > I am trying to add support for select_cc. In ARM it can be implemented > with: > > mov $dst, $falseVal > cmp $a, $b > moveq $dst, $trueVal The more normal ARM code, as produced by assembly writers and compilers that I've seen, is cmp $a, $b moveq $dst, $trueVal movne $dst, $falseVal e.g. at the end of a function returning r0 orr r0, r0, #0x40

On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, [UTF-8] Rafael Esp?ndola wrote: > The ARM has some very powerful and complex addressing modes. For > example, the data processing instructions (and, orr, add, ..) have an > addressing mode that has 11 options (imm, reg, and 9 reg + some > shift). > > I am considering 3 ways to implement this: > > 1) define one instruction that has an ARM specific

enableAdvancedRASplitCost() does the same thing as ConsiderLocalIntervalCost, but as a subtarget option instead of a command-line option, and as I’ve said it doesn’t help because it’s a non-local interval causing the eviction chain (RAGreedy::splitCanCauseEvictionChain only considers the local interval for a single block, and it’s unclear to me how to make it handle a non-local interval). John