similar to: Duplicate filename with Samba 3.0.28

Hello there, I am using nlme() to fit a logistic mixed effect model on our data. The outcome variable is binary. I got the error when I wanted to add a group factor to my model. My initial model is as below: model.a <- nlme(response~ 1/(1 + exp( -intercept- u0 - slope*TIME - u1*TIME)), + fixed=intercept+slope~1, random= u0+u1~1 |studentID,

I'm currently using rsync to backup home directories using this: rsync -avx --delete --backup --backup-dir=/u1/home.bak /u0/home/ /u1/home >> ${log} I'm trying to move to snapshot backups using this: rsync -avx --delete --backup --backup-dir=/u1/home.bak --link-dest=../home.current /u0/home/ /u1/home_${datetime} >> ${log} This works except I no longer get deleted source

data from multilevel units,first sample the class ,and then the student in calss.following is the 2-level model. and the level-1 model deals with the student,and the level-2 model deals with the class level the students belong to. Level-1 Model Y = B0 + B1*(ZLEAD) + B2*(ZBUL) + B3*(ZSHY) + R Level-2 Model B0 = G00 + U0 B1 = G10 + G11*(ZWARMT) + U1 B2 = G20 + G21*(ZWARMT) + G22*(ZABLET) +

Hello all, It seems that it is insufficient to rely on MemorySSA to correctly reorder load/stores. For example, we have this following code: v = load q store 10, p => store 10, p v = load q // This is incorrect if p and q may alias In the MemorySSA representation however, there's no syntactic dependency between load/store, because MemorySSA before transformation would look like this:

Everyone, Is there a way to manually assign usb drives to a specified device label. Is there a way to force two usb drives to be labeled as /dev/sdc and /dev/sdd? I decided to build an archive server for the purpose of backing up other fedora/centos desktops at the office. I built a machine and have installed Centos 7.3 on it with all updates current. I also purchased a 3.0 usb sata drive

[my original message to s-news & r-help is attached ] No one possessed or knew of any S/R code for the sequential t-test. Also it doesn't appear in the SAS index. One or two suggested obtaining the S+ seqtrial software which may (or may not) cover this, but this seemed to be a bit of a "hammer to crack a nut". I have written a function based on the treatment in Wetheril

On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:44 AM Juneyoung Lee <juneyoung.lee at sf.snu.ac.kr> wrote: > > Hello Daniel, > > Thank you for the reply. > My impression was that embedding such information into MemorySSA > would be helpful for shorter compilation time > as well as people who needs this kind of information for writing optimizations, > but building time of MemorySSA also

Hi all, I want to fit data called "metal" with a polynominal function as dP ~ a.0 + a.1 * U0 + a.2 * U0^2 + a.3 * U0^3 + a.4 * U0^4 The data set includes, the independant variable U0 and the dependant variable dP. I've seen that the combination of lm() and poly() can do that instead of using the nls() function. But I don't get how to interpret the results from the linear

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:08:25PM +0800, illiminable wrote: > Why not just make it OggRawFOURCC, do we really need one stream format for > rgb, and one for yuv ? [snip] > I just meant oggRaw, not fourcc. Oh, thank god you corrected this. :-) I was contemplating an "OggVid" format, and here is why I'm steering against it (though, yes, this has been a topic of

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:08:25PM +0800, illiminable wrote: > Why not just make it OggRawFOURCC, do we really need one stream format for > rgb, and one for yuv ? [snip] > I just meant oggRaw, not fourcc. Oh, thank god you corrected this. :-) I was contemplating an "OggVid" format, and here is why I'm steering against it (though, yes, this has been a topic of

> But chroma subsampling? no. And this is where much of the complexity > comes. > > If we were to combine them, we would be, essentially, doing it something > like > this: > Value Meaning > 0 RGB > 1 YUV444 > 2 YUV422 > 3 YUV420 > 4 YUV411 > ..... Yes. > And then spend an additional field on bits/channel, whereas both chroma

> But chroma subsampling? no. And this is where much of the complexity > comes. > > If we were to combine them, we would be, essentially, doing it something > like > this: > Value Meaning > 0 RGB > 1 YUV444 > 2 YUV422 > 3 YUV420 > 4 YUV411 > ..... Yes. > And then spend an additional field on bits/channel, whereas both chroma

On 2016-11-02, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> wrote: > If the standard way works, I am happy to include the original patch I > sent, amended so that it checks for presence of LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER. > If they keep this promise, then we should have no worries about things > breaking up. Diff below is what I've added to OpenBSD ports. The libressl API is not cast in

I use sieve-filter for postprocessing misclassified mail. For false positives I use the following script: require [ "variables", "include", "fileinto" ]; global [ "FORCENOSPAM", "ext", "ext1" ]; set "FORCENOSPAM" "YES"; fileinto "JUNK-PRENOUCE"; if header :matches "Delivered-To"

Hello, Does anyone have experience using a 3ware 9650SE series raid controller on CentOS 6.0? I am getting very sporadic throughput with moderately sized files (0.5-2GB) on ext3. I have tried most of the mount time tuning options: * noatime * trying different journal types * setting commit=120 - helped a little Even after these optimizations it doesn't seem like the raid array is working

If the standard way works, I am happy to include the original patch I sent, amended so that it checks for presence of LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER. If they keep this promise, then we should have no worries about things breaking up. Aki On 02.11.2016 14:24, Michael A. Peters wrote: > Indeed, which is why I use it. > > But it also is in the minority which is why I find it acceptable for

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 09:36:52PM +0800, illiminable wrote: > > Then there's YUY2 which is interleaved Y0 U0 Y1 V0 Y2 U1 Y3 V1, and YVYU > (Y0 V0 Y1 U0 Y2 V1 Y3 U1), and UYVY (U0 Y0 V0 Y1 U0 Y2 V0 Y3)... and then > there's AYUV, which has a 4th alpha channel. We will only be doing [A]YUV ordered planar encoding, no other order, not packed using one of several methods.

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 09:36:52PM +0800, illiminable wrote: > > Then there's YUY2 which is interleaved Y0 U0 Y1 V0 Y2 U1 Y3 V1, and YVYU > (Y0 V0 Y1 U0 Y2 V1 Y3 U1), and UYVY (U0 Y0 V0 Y1 U0 Y2 V0 Y3)... and then > there's AYUV, which has a 4th alpha channel. We will only be doing [A]YUV ordered planar encoding, no other order, not packed using one of several methods.

Hi, in the code below, I am drawing 1000 samples from two beta distributions, each time using the same random number seed. Using set.seed(80) produces results I expect, in that the differences between the distributions are very small. Using set.seed(20) produces results I can't make sense of. Around half of the time, it behaves as with set.seed(80), but around half of the time, it behaves

Some interesting results: copy of 500MB file 'time cp file file.new' ext3, -d1 -c1 -m16 -u1 -W1 real 1m42.435s user 0m0.220s sys 0m17.740s ext3, -d1 -c1 -m16 -u0 -W0 real 2m24.970s user 0m0.210s sys 0m18.780s ext3, -d1 -c1 -m16 -u0 -W1 real 1m52.677s user 0m0.290s sys 0m17.950s So basically my question is; do I loose all benefits of ext3 if I turn on the hard disk