similar to: vfs_ChDir fails, even though the share is read-write for that user

Dear list, I'm trying to get a Thumper (Sun Fire X4500) to play nice with AD so that we can offer a nearline storage service. Since many of our users will have multiple group memberships, it's imperative that samba be able to recurse through the groups that a user is a member of to determine if they have access to a resource. What happens instead is that every user who authenticates is

Greetings Experts! Sorry for my poor english, but I?m inside of a terrible nightmare!!! I?m using Samba+LDAP has about 2 months ago without problems, but in the last 4 hours, the system is absolutelly unstable. I couldn?t upgrade or patched anything. The problem simply has appeared. Principally system characteristics: - Sun Fire V880 running Solaris 9 - openldap-2.2.23 - nss_ldap-232 -

I want to iterate ?nodes? and ?leafs? for a yaml document: thufir@ARRAKIS:~/projects/rss$ thufir@ARRAKIS:~/projects/rss$ ruby user.rb user.rb:6: undefined method `[]'' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError) from user.rb:5:in `each_key'' from user.rb:5 thufir@ARRAKIS:~/projects/rss$ thufir@ARRAKIS:~/projects/rss$ ruby user2.rb user2.rb:5: undefined method `[]'' for

Looking at: http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=10591 What are the steps to install this application? Yes, it's a garbage application, but I'd like to at least give it a go. Looks like msiexec apparently isn't the right approach. Should that be through wcmd instead? thufir at ARRAKIS:~/.wine/drive_c$ thufir at ARRAKIS:~/.wine/drive_c$ msiexec

When logs (e.g. /var/log/maillog) are rotated (e.g. to /var/log/maillog-YYYYMDD) is there a way via systemd or whatever to assign read permission to a specific group? Right now, for example - ls -l maillog* -rw------- 1 root root 3105240 Mar 13 22:04 maillog -rw------- 1 root root 1079031 Feb 24 04:39 maillog-20190224 -rw------- 1 root root 7237640 Mar 1 12:59 maillog-20190228 -rw------- 1

Folks-- I'm working with an old system I set up to copy files from one local directory to another. I was using rdist for this, but I would prefer to shift it over to rsync. The one thing I'm missing is the trivial ability to force the group owernship of the destination files to a specific group. A read through the manpage and various searches on the web do not turn up any helpful hints

Thank you Kees. On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 09:37, Kees van Vloten via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I am currently running at 4.19.2 but I have run 4.18.6 and 4.18.5. I did > not experience any issues with nested group lookups, which many of the > filters rely on. Interestingly, I've now found that (on my current DCs, running 4.18.5), ldbsearch *does* seem to return the

> Normally a group cannot 'own' files etc, Unix uses ugo permissions and > when you chown a file you would use something like this: > > chown foo:somegroup somefile > > this would make 'foo' the owner of the file and possibly allow > 'somegroup' access to it, this would depend on whatever permissions you > set with 'chmod' > > So,

Hi, I've a question about the syntax of the valid users option. Any help is greatly appreciated! Here is the Background: samba 3.0.4 Linux as Domain Member Active Directory, not in Native Mode Compiler opions: --with-winbind --with-pam --with-smbmount The goal is to authenticate via the Windows Domain and allow access via Windows groups. The syntax in my smb.conf looks like this:

I'm quite confused by this one, as I can't see how this would happen.. but after upgrading my DCs from 4.11.10 to 4.18.5, LDAP searches don't seem to work if they use the :1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941: modifier, aka LDAP_MATCHING_RULE_IN_CHAIN. (Yes, it was a fairly big version jump.. Yes, I should have upgraded much earlier.. Yes, I know 4.19.x is out now as well) Here's a search that

Op 05-11-2023 om 23:25 schreef Jonathan Hunter via samba: > I'm quite confused by this one, as I can't see how this would happen.. > but after upgrading my DCs from 4.11.10 to 4.18.5, LDAP searches don't > seem to work if they use the :1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941: modifier, aka > LDAP_MATCHING_RULE_IN_CHAIN. (Yes, it was a fairly big version jump.. > Yes, I should have

On Wed, 2023-11-22 at 17:33 +0000, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2023 at 01:03, Andrew Bartlett < > abartlet at samba.org > > wrote: > > Are you sure that the ACLs on all the items in the chain should > > allow reading? > > It's an excellent question, thank you - I'd like to just say "Yes" > but > I will certainly check, as

Hi! I have Samba 2.0.5a on HP/UX 11.00 (it compiled great!!). When I try "net time \\mysambaservermachine" it replies with one hour more than "date" on the unix shell. I have already checked timezone vars in my unix box but I cannot find anything wrong. Should I setup something in my samba server config? I have changed "time offset" and "nmbd as a time

Op 06-11-2023 om 14:58 schreef Jonathan Hunter: > Thank you Kees. > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 09:37, Kees van Vloten via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> I am currently running at 4.19.2 but I have run 4.18.6 and 4.18.5. I did >> not experience any issues with nested group lookups, which many of the >> filters rely on. > Interestingly, I've now

I have a fedora core 5 server running samba-3.0.23c-1.fc5 from fedora updates. Recently I changed smb.conf to use security=domain instead of security=user. The server that it authenticates against is running fedora core 4 with samba-3.0.14a-2. Anyway, this setup worked just fine for a couple of weeks, but today I yum updated many packages including pam, glibc and kernel on the fedora 5

We had to do a few changes in this area (due to security issues) over that large number of releases, it is entirely possible there was a regression. If you have time and patience, could you back up your DC, restore into a subdirectory (on your DC or on a test box) with 4.11.10 from git, and then do a git bisect between that and 4.18.5. You can run the query locally with bin/ldbsearch -H

On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 14:32, Kees van Vloten <keesvanvloten at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Op 06-11-2023 om 14:58 schreef Jonathan Hunter: > > Interestingly, I've now found that (on my current DCs, running > > 4.18.5), ldbsearch *does* seem to return the expected result, but the > > same query via ldapsearch does not. > > What if you try to use starttls

I''m trying to track down why I''m getting close to desired output, but not quite. It looks like the webpage sorta-kinda is grabbing the right data. For instance, there are three Login objects which should be showing and it looks like the show is grabbing three objects, so that fits, to a degree. However, it''s just grabbing the hexadecimal object id, and not

As an addendum to my original message (copied below), I have tried a couple of things and have found the following: Running a one line login script, eg net use * \\server\share with an echo command produces the following output: The syntax is incorrect. For help, type NET USE /? at the command prompt. Yet running the same script one the machine as soon after login as possible results in he