similar to: Windows Vista file copying over openvpn

While I have concentrated on support for 2.6 native IPSEC in release 2.2.0, I am still of the opinion that unless you absolutely need IPSEC compatibility that OpenVPN is a much easier (and in the case of roadwarriors, a much better) solution. Having already generated all of the required X.509 certificates, it took me less than 1/2 hr to replace my IPSEC testbed with an OpenVPN one using the new

Hello All, I would like to use OpenVPN with Samba 4 AD using the LDAP Auth plugin. However, my tests come up with the following errors in the OpenVPN... LDAP bind failed: Strong(er) authentication required (BindSimple: Transport encryption required.) Unable to bind as CN=VPN Connect,CN=Users,DC=MYDOMAIN,DC=COM LDAP connect failed. PLUGIN_CALL: POST

Hi all, first time that i tried to use xen. My goal is to reach in ssh all the domUs after i manage to get a connection through openvpn. Like they were real servers. I installed the openvpn server on my dom0 (ubuntu 9.04 + default package + latest debian-xen-amd64 kernel) After connecting to the openvpn server I''m able to do direct ssh just to the dom0. For reaching domU i had do it with

Hi, I have some problems with my OpenVPN server in a Xen DomU. OpenVPN works fantastic but theres a problem connecting other DomUs on this server. I have the following iptable rule to forward the requests to the internet. iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.8.0.0/24 -j MASQUERADE This works fine. I can connect to other DomUs on the same server but they can''t answer the

Hi, I had some performance problems with TINC running on Windows XP. I had a VPN tunnel running over a wireless network to a Linux VPN server. Web browsing through the tunnel was a pain. Big web pages with lots of pictures loaded very slow compared to a plain network connection. When the VPN client was running on a Linux computer, and a Windows computer was browsing the web through the VPN

It's just come to my attention that newer phones from both Snom and Grandstream support OpenVPN. Is this a new trend or something? Since OpenVPN, in one swell foop, deals with both NAT issues and securing communications, I'd be very interested in hearing if other phone vendors were embracing OpenVPN as well. (Other VPN solutions are all well and good, but I really like the flexibility

I am trying to make the following connection: WindowsXP(OpenVPN-Client)->shorewall->Internet->LinksysWRTG->OpenVPN-Server ...of course the reverse path too. The OpenVPN server is running in bridge mode. When the openVPN client is launched it looks like a successful connection is made. The openVPN client gets assigned an address from the openVPN server pool. The OpenVPN

Apologies for the cross-posting to CentOS list (already mailed to OpenVPNlist).. am using OpenVPN [ http://openvpn.sf.net ] on CentOS 3.4 and having some issues.. it may possibly be an OpenVPN issue, but thought if anyone on this list is using or had any similar issues or have any thoughts.. TIA ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:26:22 -0700 Subject: resend with

Hi all. I have an OpenVPN server: 2.2.1-1 x86_64 Server config: port 11223 dev tap proto udp tls-server ca keys/ca.crt cert keys/server.crt key keys/server.key dh keys/dh1024.pem server 1.2.3.3 255.255.255.0 push "route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 1.2.3.4" keepalive 10 60 client-to-client duplicate-cn inactive 600 log /var/log/openvpn.log syslog status /var/log/openvpn-status.log user

Shorewall can run without openvpn, but you need it if you want to establish private networks through public structures. -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: info@kws-netzwerke.de [mailto:info@kws-netzwerke.de] Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Juni 2006 12:52 An: 'Shorewall Users' Betreff: AW: [Shorewall-users] OpenVPN question Shorewall is able to work with openvpn but it isn´t a bundle of a

Hi, I'm running Centos 5 32bit and installed openvpn-2.0.9-1.el5.rf from Dag Wieers Repo. When OpenVPN is started during boot-up it just shows an SElinux related error message. When I start OpenVPN manually after the system has come up completely it works fine. Here are all the messages from /var/log/messages that are SElinux related: May 28 21:39:15 srsblnfw01 kernel:

Hi all, I''m trying to use OpenVPN as a VPN solution on a firewall running Shorewall. The IPSEC VPN I tried first has shown a little bit unstable under several conditions, especially with Windows clients. As OpenVPN is best run in ''bridged'' mode (see http://fedoranews.org/contributors/florin_andrei/openvpn/), I became interested in the bridge capabilities of

I have a workgroup server with samba operating well and have configured openvpn on it. That also seems to be working well. I also have other servers at different locations with samba/openvpn working. To access the openvpn server I use Windows and manually map a drive to a drive letter using U: as \\servername\sharename The shares work but I am mapping _through_ the samba server - that is I have

Greetings, I want to setup bandwidth restrictions for a few clients that use openvpn to connect to my server. I''m using iptables to mark the packets in the mangle table (PRE/POSTROUTING) on eth0 before they get sent via the tunnel. Will the mark survive even if the packets then get routed via an openvpn tunnel (tunX) out the box or does openvpn change it removing the mark ? damnit,

Hi Rowland/Jon, When I am trying to upload/download the files without OpenVPN the speed is coming as around 10 MB/s. With OpenVPN it gets reduced to less than 1 MB/s. Below is my smb.conf details [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP server string = Samba Server dns proxy = no max log size = 1000 panic action = /usr/share/samba/panic-action %d netbios

Hello, I have the need to connect 2 remote site with vpn, the windows pc of the 2 site it can share the HD and printer. This is my configuration : LOCAL NETWORK A : ip from 192.168.10.2 to 192.168.10.99 | | | | eth0: 192.168.10.1 FIREWALL A : ( with debian ; openvpn ver. 2.0.beta15 ; shorewall ver 2.0.11 ) eth1 : xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ( pubblic ip address ) | | | | INTERNET | | | eth1 :

Hello, I want to create a VPN between two Asterisk servers using OpenVPN. How to configure Asterisk and OpenVPN to do that. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070809/ddaed76b/attachment.htm

Good day, First off, I''m a complete puppet newbie, this openvpn recipe is pretty much the first puppet work I''ve done so be gentle :-) Secondly, the openvpn setup for Debian (and systems based on Debian) allows each openvpn network (tunnel) to be specified using a separate config file for each: /etc/openvpn/<vpn>.conf Each tunnel can be then stopped/started/restarted

I have previously set up an openvpn LAN to LAN bridging VPN so I know a little about what has to happen. The gateways on either ends were running older version of shorewall that did not support openvpn directly so I just basically opened ports for it and used bridging with tap interfaces. I am no longer using that vpn link to the other house but now that i''ve upgraded I would like

> I don't think it's an endpoint issue. I think the SIP packet headers get > over-written by the tunnel (openvpn) protocol. I'd be rather astonished if OpenVPN itself were responsible for this. As far as I know, OpenVPN doesn't do higher-level-protocol rewriting of any sort. It just provides the "bit pipe" through the tunnel. I'd suggest several other