similar to: Making a public drive where admin has write access

Hello I am trying to configure samba with Fedora Directory Server 1.0.4 on a Fedora 8 machine. I am following this guide: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:Samba. Everything has "seemed" to work out fine until I got to the part of Populating FDS with PDC Entry. My end result is hopefully that user can log in on Windows XP Pro with pGina and have their home drive automounted

Hello I am trying to configure samba with Fedora Directory Server 1.0.4 on a Fedora 8 machine. I am following this guide: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:Samba. Everything has "seemed" to work out fine until I got to the part of Populating FDS with PDC Entry. My end result is hopefully that user can log in on Windows XP Pro with pGina and have their home drive automounted

Hello I am trying to configure samba with Fedora Directory Server 1.0.4 on a Fedora 8 machine. I am following this guide: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Howto:Samba#PAM_Configuration. Everything has "seemed" to work out fine until I got to the part of Populating FDS with PDC Entry. My end result is hopefully that user can log in on Windows XP Pro with pGina and have their home

Hi I want to create a nice picture about my result of k -the nearest neighbours algorithm. Here is my easy code: ################################# library(klaR) library(ipred) library(mlbench) data(PimaIndiansDiabetes2) dane=na.omit(PimaIndiansDiabetes2)[,c(2,5,9)] dane[,2]=log(dane[,2]) dane[,1:2]=scale(dane[,1:2]) zbior.uczacy=sample(1:nrow(dane),nrow(dane)/2,F)

Hi everybody! I want to find a closer neighbourins observation. This is my code: ########################## library(klaR) library(ipred) library(mlbench) data(PimaIndiansDiabetes2) dane=na.omit(PimaIndiansDiabetes2)[,c(2,5,9)] dane[,2]=log(dane[,2]) dane[,1:2]=scale(dane[,1:2]) zbior.uczacy=sample(1:nrow(dane),nrow(dane)/2,F)

Hello list, I'm contemplating running my own CA to implement the new proposed ISP for validation of S/MIME certificates via DANE. I already use self-signed for my MX servers (with 3 1 1 dane records on TCP port 25) but I don't want to use self-signed for S/MIME for user specific x.509 certs because A) That's potentially a lot of DNS records B) That requires a hash of the e-mail

Hello! I'd like to set up dovecot to keep namespaces in database, keep more than one namespace per user. I try to create the simplest rule (even without tuple in db table) to get new namespace, unfortunately it doesn't work. My user_query is: SELECT '/dane/domeny/%d/mail/%n/' as home, dovecot_typ_skrzynki ||':'|| '/dane/domeny/%d/mail/%n/' ||'.'||

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I would undo that, it appears to be wrong. OK, i've undo also i. > I have tested this on a Ubuntu 22.04 computer and it works, so I have > updated the wiki page: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/PAM_Offline_Authentication Apparently works as expected: root at dane:~# wbinfo -K gaio Enter gaio's password:

On 04/14/2017 10:41 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > https://www.openca.org/ might fit my needs. their Centos repo does not exist, it seems? > > On 04/14/2017 06:29 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> Hello list, >> >> I'm contemplating running my own CA to implement the new proposed ISP >> for validation of S/MIME certificates via DANE. >> >> I already use

I'm sory for my weak english. I need to analyze this subject : x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 x9 x10 y 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 czarne 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 rude 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 braz 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 blond 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 rude 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 blond 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 czarne 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 blond 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 blond 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 czarne 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 czarne 1 0 1 0 0 0

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: > Not with a smtp that enforces DANE. I'm aware of how DANE works. The only problem is no MTA outside of Postfix implements it. You can thank the hatred of DNSSEC for that. Brandon Vincent

What about the pki package that comes with Centos? pki-server and pki-ca? On 04/16/2017 11:54 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > Oh I don't know, their github works. > > However it seems that it isn't able to deal with more than one ocsp > signing key. > > On 04/16/2017 08:40 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> >> >> On 04/14/2017 10:41 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:

Is it possible to trigger a service restart without always forcing that service to be running? We shutdown mysql for about 30min every day to do backups, and I don''t want puppet to start mysql during this window. So I''ve removed ensure => "running" from the mysql service. But now notify => Service[mysql] doesn''t restart mysql. Is it possible to tell

On 22/05/2023 10:14, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > >> I would undo that, it appears to be wrong. > > OK, i've undo also i. > > >> I have tested this on a Ubuntu 22.04 computer and it works, so I have >> updated the wiki page: >>

On 02/19/2017 05:39 AM, KT Walrus wrote: >> That's one of the reasons I don't like Let's Encrypt, with one year certs it is easier to look at the certs and see what is going to expire in the coming month needing a new private key. > > I use dehydrated (with Cloudflare DNS challenges) and as far as I know, it seems to generate a new private key every time. Yeah that would

On 04/27/2016 07:50 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 04/27/2016 12:41 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> On 04/27/2016 12:30 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >> *snip* >>> >>> Unless you have a very specific requirement for a very bleeding edge >>> feature it's fundamentally a terrible idea to move away from the >>> distribution packages in something as exposed

yacinechaouche at yahoo.com writes: > Interesting. Is there any particular benefit in having only one file > for both certificate and private key ? I find that putting private key > in a separate file feels more secure. It's convenient to have key and cert in one place if you don't need the certificate to be publically readable. Keeping it in separate files would add slightly

Hi! I'm not sure is it the same as described by Andrew Lewis, this is whay i'm posting. Log is: 2011-03-31T17:40:08.369598+02:00 hermes dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<marcin at mejor.pl>, method=PLAIN, rip=62.121.127.119, lip=193.238.12.139, mpid=19221, TLS 2011-03-31T17:40:08.684562+02:00 hermes dovecot: imap(marcin at mejor.pl): Error: Corrupted dbox file

On Thu, June 16, 2016 13:53, Walter H. wrote: > On 15.06.2016 16:17, Warren Young wrote: >> but it also affects the other public CAs: you can???t get a >> publicly-trusted cert for a machine without a publicly-recognized >> and -visible domain name. For that, you still need to use >> self-signed certs or certs signed by a private CA. >> > A private CA is the

On 19/08/15 17:50, Alice Wonder wrote: > > > On 08/19/2015 09:24 AM, Kai Bojens wrote: >> On 19-08-15 08:30:27, Alice Wonder wrote: >> >>> e-mail by its very design is not secure, SMTP creates "Man In The >>> Middle" at every server along the way. >> >> DANE exists and mail servers like postfix support this. My logfiles >> show