similar to: RPMS and SRPM for RHEL-5/CentOS-5 available

Is there a yum repository which contains the package gtkterm for CentOS-5? -- Michael St. Laurent IT Department Hartwell Corporation -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Does anyone know of an ACL/extended attributes enabled version of the Red Hat 9 kernel exist in RPM form? -- Michael St. Laurent Hartwell Corporation

We had to power down all servers today for electrical maintenance in the building and for some reason I began having access problems related to the valid users lists when power was restored. The dialog from the 'Samba-3.0.23 broke my network' thread seemed as if it might be related even though I had not performed any software upgrade so I tried adding the group mappings as discussed in

I've gone further down the food chain in diagnosing the problem: A net rpc join command works but wbinfo -u or wbinfo -g fails: [root@hcnas samba]# net rpc join -U Administrator Password: Joined domain MERCURY. [root@hcnas samba]# net rpc info -U Administrator Password: Domain Name: MERCURY Domain SID: S-1-5-21-356471451-824197641-1237804090 Sequence number: 20543 Num users: 625 Num domain

What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the latest updates support it? -- This e-mail may contain technical information which is controlled by the United States Government, Department of State, International Traffic & Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR 120-130) which requires an export license prior to sharing with foreign persons. Lacking such license, ITAR technical

Why doesn't samba.org's source RPM for Fedora list cups-devel as a BuildRequires? Red Hat's/Fedora's version of the source RPM does require it. Not requiring it and leaving --enable-cups as auto means that the resulting RPM's features depend on which machine it's built on; that seems incorrect to me. I've noticed that some RPMs control which features are built

Hi, I've got a Word document on a Samba share that I can't rename, overwrite or open. Attempting to rename it gives: Cannot rename Filename: There has been a sharing violation. Attempting to open it gives: Filename.doc is locked for editing by 'another user'. This is on a NAS box so I can't say which Samba version it is. There are no temporary files in the share to show who

Is there not a separate SMP kernel for multi-processor systems in CentOS-5? I don't see one in the repository. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070801/c1d05b7f/attachment-0001.html>

On Dec 7, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:57:01PM +0100, Zdenek Sedlak wrote: > >> AFAIK, the 7(1503) format is used only on the websites, and internally >> CentOS uses 7.1.1503. Do you see this as an issue? > > Yes. It confuses humans. There have been a bunch of examples given of > how it confuses

On 7 Dec 2015 23:43, "J Martin Rushton" <martinrushton56 at btinternet.com> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/12/15 22:37, Warren Young wrote: > > On Dec 7, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:57:01PM +0100, Zdenek Sedlak wrote: > >>

Hi, I am deciding on what 'RHEL clone' to use and prefer to use one that has a quick release after RedHat releases an update. I checked the repositories, but have not encountered any of the latest errata. Am I looking at the wrong place ? Thanks, Taco

For folks who want samba-3.6.0 for RHEL 5 or 6, and would prefer to have RHEL compatible layouts rather than the somewhat different layouts of the packages at http://ftp.samba.org/pub/samba/Binary_Packages/, I've published some .spec files and patches at https://github.com/nkadel/samba-3.6.0-srpm I'm happy to walk through how to build these with "mock" to get very clean

Hello, For those on Red Hat boxes I've have made an SRPM of Asterisk from today's CVS at http://www.laimbock.com/dl/asterisk It is based on the specfile included in Asterisk from cvs. The RPMs have been built on a RH9 box. Actually, there are more than one: Asterisk - plain Asterisk - with samples Asterisk - with debugging on Asterisk - with samples and debugging on Due to space

Hello, For those on Red Hat boxes I've have started an SRPM of Zaptel from today's CVS at http://www.laimbock.com/dl/asterisk The SRPM has one problem in that I can't get the darn thing to update /etc/modules.conf so the proper modules get loaded. When you install the RPM (built on RH9) it will tell you what to do on the console. Anyone who has a clue to fix this is kindly invited to

When I use yum to install xen 3.2.0 and xen-libs it also pulls in then centos kernel-xen? I thought the srpm contained all that was needed besides obvious deps like bridge utils etc? To get this running, I change the grub stanza kernel-xen creates to have the kernel point to xen.gz-3.2 and one of the module lines to point to my custom initrd for pciback loading. That leaves the other module line

I am running RHEL 4.4 and CentOS 4.4, I dont run Apache only Lighttpd. How do I compile php from php.srpm without apache support? Well I have been compiling php from srpm like this forever rpmbuild -ba --target=i686 php.spec But today it somehow bugged me, I dont use apache on this server. But its asking me to install httpd and httpd-devel to compile. Isnt there a syntax to skip the apache

Hi List, I have been searching for the correct createrepo command to make a 6.4 respin. We have been doing this with previous versions using createrepo -u "media://$discinfo" -g ${DIR}/my_kickstart${VER}/comps.xml . Which had worked fine until now. Thanks, -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com

On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 08:26:54AM +0000, Fuad Tabba wrote: > Thanks for your comments Jason, and for clarifying my cover letter > David. I think David has covered everything, and I'll make sure to > clarify this in the cover letter when I respin. I don't want you to respin. I think this is a bad idea.

On 12.11.24 06:26, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 08:26:54AM +0000, Fuad Tabba wrote: >> Thanks for your comments Jason, and for clarifying my cover letter >> David. I think David has covered everything, and I'll make sure to >> clarify this in the cover letter when I respin. > > I don't want you to respin. I think this is a bad idea. I'm

Recent convert from WhiteBox, a few questions What is the difference between CentOS 4.2 and "4"? Is this like the Whitebox "respin"? Are updates/packages for 4.2 applicable across all the "4" series of releases? -Ben -- "The best way to predict the future is to invent it." - XEROX PARC slogan, circa 1978