similar to: Share root directory appears in subdirectories. (Well, can't actually see it but can cd into it, even if its not there.) (Serious bug?)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Share root directory appears in subdirectories. (Well, can't actually see it but can cd into it, even if its not there.) (Serious bug?)"

2007 Oct 13
0
"CIFS VFS: server not responding" with some client/server combinations
I have the following, very strange problem, which I'll try to describe now: A Samba server running Debian Etch with latest updates. Different clients one running Etch with latest updates, too. The other one runs either Ubuntu (don't know which version because it's not my installation, but quite recent) or the older Debian 3 but with a recent vanilla kernel (either 2.6.20.1 or
2018 May 15
2
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Thank you Ravi for your fast answer. As requested you will find below the "stat" and "getfattr" of one of the files and its parent directory from all three nodes of my cluster. NODE 1: File: ?/data/myvolume-private/brick/dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/dir5/dir6/dir7/dir8/dir9/dir10/OC_DEFAULT_MODULE/filename.shareKey? Size: 0 Blocks: 38 IO Block: 131072 regular
2018 May 17
0
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Hi mabi, Some questions: -Did you by any chance change the cluster.quorum-type option from the default values? -Is filename.shareKey supposed to be any empty file? Looks like the file was fallocated with the keep-size option but never written to. (On the 2 data bricks, stat output shows Size =0, but non zero Blocks and yet a 'regular empty file'). -Do you have some sort of a
2018 May 17
2
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Hi Ravi, Please fine below the answers to your questions 1) I have never touched the cluster.quorum-type option. Currently it is set as following for this volume: Option Value ------ ----- cluster.quorum-type none 2) The .shareKey
2018 May 23
0
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Hello, I just wanted to ask if you had time to look into this bug I am encountering and if there is anything else I can do? For now in order to get rid of these 3 unsynched files shall I do the same method that was suggested to me in this thread? Thanks, Mabi ? ??????? Original Message ??????? On May 17, 2018 11:07 PM, mabi <mabi at protonmail.ch> wrote: > ?? > > Hi Ravi,
2018 May 15
0
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
On 05/15/2018 12:38 PM, mabi wrote: > Dear all, > > I have upgraded my replica 3 GlusterFS cluster (and clients) last Friday from 3.12.7 to 3.12.9 in order to fix this bug but unfortunately I notice that I still have exactly the same problem as initially posted in this thread. > > It looks like this bug is not resolved as I just got right now 3 unsynched files on my arbiter node
2018 May 23
1
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
On 05/23/2018 12:47 PM, mabi wrote: > Hello, > > I just wanted to ask if you had time to look into this bug I am encountering and if there is anything else I can do? > > For now in order to get rid of these 3 unsynched files shall I do the same method that was suggested to me in this thread? Sorry Mabi,? I haven't had a chance to dig deeper into this. The workaround of
2004 Jul 01
5
Inter-Tel Eclipse2 (IP PhonePlus)
Hello All, Just looking some comments from gurus about this proprietary systems and phones: Inter-Tel Eclipse2 Model name: IP PhonePlus I did not find anything useful or reasonable about their products on their website or even in Internet.... except sales. -- Thanks and regards, Vasyl Rublyov
2018 May 15
2
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Dear all, I have upgraded my replica 3 GlusterFS cluster (and clients) last Friday from 3.12.7 to 3.12.9 in order to fix this bug but unfortunately I notice that I still have exactly the same problem as initially posted in this thread. It looks like this bug is not resolved as I just got right now 3 unsynched files on my arbiter node like I used to do before upgrading. This problem started
2018 Apr 09
2
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Thanks Ravi for your answer. Stupid question but how do I delete the trusted.afr xattrs on this brick? And when you say "this brick", do you mean the brick on the arbitrer node (node 3 in my case)? ?? ??????? Original Message ??????? On April 9, 2018 1:24 PM, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> wrote: > ?? > > On 04/09/2018 04:36 PM, mabi wrote: > > >
2018 Apr 09
0
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
On 04/09/2018 05:09 PM, mabi wrote: > Thanks Ravi for your answer. > > Stupid question but how do I delete the trusted.afr xattrs on this brick? > > And when you say "this brick", do you mean the brick on the arbitrer node (node 3 in my case)? Sorry I should have been clearer. Yes the brick on the 3rd node. `setfattr -x trusted.afr.myvol-private-client-0
2018 Apr 09
2
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Again thanks that worked and I have now no more unsynched files. You mentioned that this bug has been fixed in 3.13, would it be possible to backport it to 3.12? I am asking because 3.13 is not a long-term release and as such I would not like to have to upgrade to 3.13. ??????? Original Message ??????? On April 9, 2018 1:46 PM, Ravishankar N <ravishankar at redhat.com> wrote: > ??
2018 Apr 09
2
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
As I was suggested in the past by this mailing list a now ran a stat and getfattr on one of the problematic files on all nodes and at the end a stat on the fuse mount directly. The output is below: NODE1: STAT: File: ?/data/myvol-private/brick/dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/dir5/dir6/dir7/dir8/dir9/dir10/dir11/dir12_Archiv/azipfiledir.zip/OC_DEFAULT_MODULE/problematicfile? Size: 0 Blocks: 38
2004 Aug 13
1
Interop RTP "Extension headers" for QOS?
We're setting up a connection with Level3's voip system and when we use Asterisk or make or recv calls we get an initial pulsing noise. Level3's Interop team explains that's their RTP extension headers and Asterisk apparently doesn't know what to do with it. He said we need to either ignore or of course let the traffic pass. Has anyone heard of this before? I understand the
2018 Apr 09
0
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
On 04/09/2018 04:36 PM, mabi wrote: > As I was suggested in the past by this mailing list a now ran a stat and getfattr on one of the problematic files on all nodes and at the end a stat on the fuse mount directly. The output is below: > > NODE1: > > STAT: > File:
2018 Apr 09
0
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
On 04/09/2018 05:40 PM, mabi wrote: > Again thanks that worked and I have now no more unsynched files. > > You mentioned that this bug has been fixed in 3.13, would it be possible to backport it to 3.12? I am asking because 3.13 is not a long-term release and as such I would not like to have to upgrade to 3.13. I don't think there will be another 3.12 release. Adding Karthik to see
2018 Apr 09
0
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Here would be also the corresponding log entries on a gluster node brick log file: [2018-04-09 06:58:47.363536] W [MSGID: 113093] [posix-gfid-path.c:84:posix_remove_gfid2path_xattr] 0-myvol-private-posix: removing gfid2path xattr failed on /data/myvol-private/brick/.glusterfs/12/67/126759f6-8364-453c-9a9c-d9ed39198b7a: key = trusted.gfid2path.2529bb66b56be110 [No data available] [2018-04-09
2018 Apr 09
2
New 3.12.7 possible split-brain on replica 3
Hello, Last Friday I upgraded my GlusterFS 3.10.7 3-way replica (with arbitrer) cluster to 3.12.7 and this morning I got a warning that 9 files on one of my volumes are not synced. Ineeded checking that volume with a "volume heal info" shows that the third node (the arbitrer node) has 9 files to be healed but are not being healed automatically. All nodes were always online and there
2009 Apr 22
2
purge-empty-dirs and max-file-size confusion
I want to use --min-size to copy just large files (and their necessary parent directories), but everything I've tried copies *all* the source directories, and creates them empty on the destination even if they don't have any big files in them. I only want the minimal directory hierarchies that contain the big files. This doesn't work: $ rm -rf /tmp/foo $ rsync -ai --min-size
2005 Feb 11
3
Lossless audio codecs for video editing
Hi, this email is sent to flac-dev AT xiph DOT org, copied to matroska-devel AT lists DOT matroska DOT org, and David Bryant, the author of Wavpack4. We are about to implement the DV ( Digital Video ) video compression standard into matroska, to be able to offer an intelligent alternative to AVI for DV handling in editor tools. DV is using a high quality, high bitrate lossy video compression