similar to: FreeBSD 4.11 -> 6.2 Oplocks issue..

I am having problems upgrading samba 3.0.36 to 3.3.7. I have a working installation of Samba 3.0.36 on FreeBSD 7.2 amd64, configured as a domain member in a 2003 AD, running in native mode. Domain controllers have Services for Unix 3.5 installed and I am using idmap backend with SFU schema mode. I have enclosed my configuration files and compile options further down. When I upgrade to version

Hello All, I'm trying to figure out where the problem is, but I'm not having much luck as I seem to get conflicting information from the various logs on my FreeBSD 6.1 system. I'm getting this in the /var/log/samba/log.smbd: [2006/06/05 12:31:43, 0] smbd/oplock.c:release_level_2_oplocks_on_change(771) release_level_2_oplocks_on_change: failed to lock share mode entry for

Hello, I've managed to join four other samba servers to win2k3 domains in the past but I am stuck doing so with samba-3.0.23c_2,1. I've verified hosts / domain forward and reverse lookups succeed. Below are my configurations. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1-stable cvsupped as of Nov 17. I've built Samba with the following options... WITH_LDAP=true WITH_ADS=true WITHOUT_CUPS=true

Hi everyone; I noticed today while watching my syslog, a few entries like this: Nov 8 15:17:08 [machine] smbd[26137]: Attempt to create file (FILE.GHO) with volid set - please report this Nov 8 15:28:08 [machine] smbd[26137]: Attempt to create file (FILE0001.GHS) with volid set - please report this Nov 8 15:41:46 [machine] smbd[26137]: Attempt to create file (FILE0002.GHS) with volid

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Everyone, On January 31st, FreeBSD 4.11 and FreeBSD 6.0 will have reached their End of Life dates and will no longer be supported by the FreeBSD Security Team. Users of either of these FreeBSD releases are strongly encouraged to upgrade to FreeBSD 5.5, FreeBSD 6.1, or the upcoming FreeBSD 6.2 before that date. Discussion concerning FreeBSD

Ben, I think I'm being hit with this bug (I see EDID is invalid in dmesg), is there any workaround outside of recompiling without that commit and can I give any information to help? Max -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/attachments/20170608/de78457c/attachment.html>

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101368 Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QA Contact| |xorg-team at lists.x.org Product|DRI |xorg Assignee|dri-devel at

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101368 --- Comment #8 from Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> --- I investigated an issue a while back that I believe is likely the same as what you're experiencing. I'm, unfortunately, not able to reproduce properly (long story) on any hardware I own. I've identified a few issues that could result in what you're seeing, however,

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101368 --- Comment #9 from wilrikerDE+freedesktop at gmail.com --- I have the same issue on an Asus PL80Jt which has the same Nvidia Chip built in. Using modprobe.blacklist=nouveau let's me but just fine (except that PRIME won't be enabled and the card will not be disabled by vgaswitcheroo). Otherwise I experience what has been described here.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101368 --- Comment #10 from Ben Steel <bhs_suse at precisionforesight.com> --- Thank you Mr. Coenen. I agree. Kernel 4.12.0-rc6 does not exhibit the problem on a Lenovo T510 either. Between a fix already in the pipeline and a modeset workaround in the meantime, I'm happy. Does anyone still need the bisection completed? -- You are receiving

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101368 Ben Steel <bhs_suse at precisionforesight.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101368 --- Comment #11 from Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> --- (In reply to Ben Steel from comment #10) > Thank you Mr. Coenen. I agree. Kernel 4.12.0-rc6 does not exhibit the > problem on a Lenovo T510 either. > Between a fix already in the pipeline and a modeset workaround in the > meantime, I'm happy. Does anyone still need

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101368 --- Comment #12 from Ben Steel <bhs_suse at precisionforesight.com> --- Yikes. I only waited about 28 hours before completely restoring that machine from backup and putting it back in service. Food for thought: my greatest fear is that the problem may have been illuminated by the change to GCC 7, which doesn't like compiling 4.10

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101368 Daniel Otero <otero.o.daniel at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.freedesktop.or | |g/show_bug.cgi?id=101587 --

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko at kernel.org> wrote: > On Mon 14-08-17 15:27:20, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko at kernel.org> wrote: > [...] >> > nouveau 0000:03:00.0: fifo: channel 6 [mpv/vo[3535]] kick timeout >> > nouveau: mpv/vo[3535]:00000000:0000906f: detach gr failed, -110 >>

On Mon 14-08-17 15:27:20, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko at kernel.org> wrote: [...] > > nouveau 0000:03:00.0: fifo: channel 6 [mpv/vo[3535]] kick timeout > > nouveau: mpv/vo[3535]:00000000:0000906f: detach gr failed, -110 > > Are you using mpv in conjunction with the GL video output and > VDPAU-based acceleration? That

Hi is there a reason why xen 4.11 isnt released for centos7 (I cant find it on http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/)? -- ------ Greetz

Hello, I have to migrate 30GB from a Novell Netware 4.11 to Samba (ReiserFS/ACL). When I used robocopy.exe from the Windows XP Resource-Kit, it will only copy the Timestamp, but not the owner. Is there a way to copy the owner of a file or directory? matze

Can you please post your smb.conf? On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 12:45 PM Kacper via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > After upgrading to Samba 4.11 (from 4.10) I noticed that python > scripts using tempfile.mkstemp fail when run against samba cifs > mounts. Before I submit a bug report, could someone else try this out > so it's not just my setup? >

On 21/09/2019 17:43, Kacper via samba wrote: > Hello, > > After upgrading to Samba 4.11 (from 4.10) I noticed that python > scripts using tempfile.mkstemp fail when run against samba cifs > mounts. Before I submit a bug report, could someone else try this out > so it's not just my setup? > > How to reproduce: > 1. Mount a Samba 4.11 share using the mount command: