similar to: problems with groups, winbind authenticating a centOS 4 machine to AD

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "problems with groups, winbind authenticating a centOS 4 machine to AD"

2004 Sep 15
0
well-known groups and i18n
I'm confused with group mappings. I have a win2k pt_BR server in native mode. After joining the domain (samba-3.0.7) and configuring winbind, I have these standard groups: # getent group (...) MYDOMAIN\Computadores do dom?nio:x:16777216: MYDOMAIN\Controladores de dom?nio:x:16777217: MYDOMAIN\Administradores de esquemas:x:16777218:MYDOMAIN\Administrador MYDOMAIN\Administra??o de
2006 Oct 19
0
Unable to log on (authenticating) to a Samba NT Domain
I have 4 machines at home: 1 Linux Centos 4.4 running as a PDC 1 Linux Centos domain member running as my file server. Winbind works properly and I'm able to share files perfectly well 1 Windows XP sp2, member of my domain. No problem accessing files on Centos domain member 1 Linux Fedora Core 5, also a domain member. I'm unable to logon my Fedora 5 machine to my domain. I've joined
2005 May 06
3
Winbind issues with UID and GID mappings
I am having issues integrating a FC3 system with AD running on W2k3. I can not figure out why the user ID mappings and Group ID mappings are going stale. This is a generic FC3 install with all of the latest updates. login as: jgallagh Sent username "jgallagh" jgallagh@linman's password: Last login: Fri May 6 08:14:23 2005 from 192.168.168.2 id: cannot find name for group ID
2018 Nov 30
2
Fw: AD usres are not show in Domain Controller when apply setfacl command
Dear Rowland Penny  I follow your mentioned step still i am face the same problem I have 1 Domain Controller [sambadc] and 1 Domain member for Samba Share and backup [backupserver] 1.when try view the ACL rights is backup server i can able view the domain user name [root at backupserver Rishinox]# getfacl /ADHDD/Rishinox/ getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file:
2018 Nov 28
0
Fw: AD usres are not show in Domain Controller when apply setfacl command
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 08:36:47 +0000 (UTC) barani tharan via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Dear Team I show below my problem when try to apply setfacl to share > directory in domain controller > > > My Problem is: > I have one Samba AD [4.1] it work fine. I create common share folder Samba 4.1.x is EOL, you really should upgrade. > in domain
2018 Nov 28
2
Fw: AD usres are not show in Domain Controller when apply setfacl command
Dear Team I show below my problem when try to apply setfacl to share directory in domain controller My Problem is: I have one Samba AD [4.1] it work fine. I create common share folder in domain controller when try to apply ACL permission it show the following message [root at sambadc ~]# setfacl -m "u:RISHI\Administrator:rwx" /ADD_Drive/Samplesetfacl: Option -m: Invalid argument near
2005 Jun 08
2
Problems with Samba and Windows 2003 Active Domain Server
Can somebody with experience making a RedHat Fedora Core 3 server with Samba installed work in a Windows 2003 Active Domain please give me some pointers? I have a small installation with one Windows 2003 Server running as a domain controller for about 10 Windows XP machines. This is working just fine. I decided that I wanted to add a RedHat Fedora Core 3 server as a Mail server, running Cyrus IMAP
2007 Dec 01
0
ADS - Not recognizing Domain Admin group membership (from 1 workstation only)
I've been running a couple Centos5 and RHEL4/5 servers with samba for a while now and everything has been working great with our Windows 2003 AD. All of a sudden though I'm experience something really weird on one of the RHEL5 boxes. Whenever I try to connect as a Domain Admin from one particular Vista client, I get access denied and repeated prompts for a username/password - this has
2015 Aug 05
2
Linux Workstation x SMB4 DC
An example of how slow is... [root at CTA1PAPAN001645 ~]# time id teste uid=16777232(teste) gid=16777216(domain users) grupos=16777216(domain users),16777220(operacao),16777222(BUILTIN\users) real 1m15.981s user 0m0.005s sys 0m0.007s According this documentation, if I want use File Sharing without AD modifications only option is Winbind (idmap_rid).
2020 Feb 28
2
auto_private_groups analogue?
Manually.? Direct edit of passwd and group.Sent from my Sprint Phone.------ Original message------From: Rowland penny via sambaDate: Fri, Feb 28, 2020 2:04 AMTo: samba at lists.samba.org;Cc: Subject:Re: [Samba] auto_private_groups analogue?On 28/02/2020 00:00, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: > Maybe a workaround?? We use winbind and default domain.? Therefore > there are two records from
2013 Mar 02
0
estrange behavior with some users
Hello list We have migrated from our samba 3 domain to samba 4 and we are still trying to figure somethings I have two servers, one is my domain pdc named dominio, my other one is a fileserver with samba 3.6.6 named srvfs So, i've joined srvfs to my domain using net ads and everything is ok, i can see the users and validate them But i have a particular case with a few users, this is the
2020 Feb 28
0
auto_private_groups analogue?
On 28/02/2020 13:24, chriscox--- via samba wrote: > Manually.? Direct edit of passwd and group.Sent from my Sprint Phone.------ Original message------From: Rowland penny via sambaDate: Fri, Feb 28, 2020 2:04 AMTo: samba at lists.samba.org;Cc: Subject:Re: [Samba] auto_private_groups analogue?On 28/02/2020 00:00, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: >> Maybe a workaround?? We use winbind and
2015 Aug 05
0
Linux Workstation x SMB4 DC
On 05/08/15 15:36, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: > An example of how slow is... > > [root at CTA1PAPAN001645 ~]# time id teste > uid=16777232(teste) gid=16777216(domain users) grupos=16777216(domain > users),16777220(operacao),16777222(BUILTIN\users) > > real 1m15.981s > user 0m0.005s > sys 0m0.007s > > According this documentation, if I want use File
2020 Feb 28
2
auto_private_groups analogue?
What I'm offering is a solution. Again, what I proposed is a functional workaround. It's actually pretty natural and obvious when you get right down to it. On 2/28/20 8:00 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 28/02/2020 13:24, chriscox--- via samba wrote: >> Manually.? Direct edit of passwd and group.Sent from my Sprint Phone.------ >> Original message------From:
2015 Aug 05
0
Linux Workstation x SMB4 DC
On 05/08/15 17:18, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: > Em 2015-08-05 11:45, Rowland Penny escreveu: >> On 05/08/15 15:36, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: >>> An example of how slow is... >>> >>> [root at CTA1PAPAN001645 ~]# time id teste >>> uid=16777232(teste) gid=16777216(domain users) >>> grupos=16777216(domain >>>
2004 Aug 31
0
Overloaded winbind
I'm running Samba 3.0.4 on Red Hat Enterprise ES v3 (Update 2), utilizing ACLs on ext3. Yesterday I discovered that my backup application (Galaxy 5.0) doesn't back up ACLs and won't until the next release (sometime this fall). I figured that I'd do a "poor man's backup" of the ACLs by running "getfacl -R --absolute-names /shares > /root/acls" on a daily
2015 Aug 05
2
Linux Workstation x SMB4 DC
Em 2015-08-05 11:45, Rowland Penny escreveu: > On 05/08/15 15:36, Jefferson B. Limeira wrote: >> An example of how slow is... >> >> [root at CTA1PAPAN001645 ~]# time id teste >> uid=16777232(teste) gid=16777216(domain users) grupos=16777216(domain >> users),16777220(operacao),16777222(BUILTIN\users) >> >> real 1m15.981s >> user 0m0.005s
2023 Jul 28
1
check_account: Failed to find local account with UID" issue / The university of Chicago
Hi Experts, We encountered a weird issue after restarting the server. Seems everything working fine on the configuration side but the user?s not able to authenticate with the Samba server. Can you please help to investigate the issue? Our setup details and configuration file + error logs + service status. Samba:- 4.18.3-0 CentOS Linux release 8.4.2105 Authentication mechanism is SSSD [root at
2004 Apr 13
0
sid to uid/gid conversion problem
Hi there! I'm experiencing the following weird problem: pokeball:# wbinfo -n VTB+jimenezju S-1-5-21-776561741-1450060922-1644491937-1249 1 pokeball:# wbinfo -Y S-1-5-21-776561741-1450060922-1644491937-1249 1 11771 pokeball:# wbinfo -Y S-1-5-21-776561741-1450060922-1644491937-1249 1 11772 pokeball:# wbinfo -S S-1-5-21-776561741-1450060922-1644491937-1249 1 10140 pokeball:# wbinfo -S
2012 Jan 01
1
Compiling 64-bit libFLAC/libFLAC++ on OS X Lion, anyone successful?
I have also asked this question on stackoverflow (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8694676/compiling-64-bit-flac-libflac-in-os-x-lion), which you can answer if you're interested in reputation points. I am very unfamiliar with compiling C/C++ source of this size, and I'm having trouble debugging the issue. Basically, in the root folder of the FLAC bundle, even if I use the flags