similar to: problem with SAMBA as PDC

Hi, I've been trying to build a password forwarding proxy to Gmail without success... The SSL connection to Dovecot is happening no problem (as far as I can tell), but for some reason the conversation between Dovecot and Gmail is getting timed out. I know this is supposed to be simple... :-( But could somebody please give me some help by pointing what I'm not doing right? No matter

Test both the TLS enabled and fallback paths. nbd-server doesn't appear to support TLS at all, and qemu-nbd is known not to allow fallback to unencrypted, and therefore it only makes sense to test nbdkit at the moment. --- .gitignore | 4 ++++ TODO | 3 --- interop/Makefile.am | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ interop/interop.c | 30

This neutral refactoring adds -DTLS_MODE. We can in future change the requested TLS mode, but not in this commit. It also checks that nbd_get_tls_negotiated returns true after connecting, when the requested mode was set to LIBNBD_TLS_REQUIRE. --- interop/Makefile.am | 4 ++++ interop/interop.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git

This borrows from a trick in libvirt - by defining $(NULL) to expand to an empty string, we can more consistently write multi-line macros where all useful lines terminate with \, making it easier to add/remove lines without worrying about whether \ needs to be touched up on neighboring lines. --- Looks big, but is fairly mechanical. I'm also doing a similar patch for nbdkit, where it would

On 9/17/19 5:35 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Test both the TLS enabled and fallback paths. > > nbd-server doesn't appear to support TLS at all, and qemu-nbd is known > not to allow fallback to unencrypted, and therefore it only makes > sense to test nbdkit at the moment. > --- > .gitignore | 4 ++++ > +interop_nbdkit_tls_certs_allow_enabled_SOURCES =

I don't really need logging of successful local deliveries since the MTA provides enough data. I can't get rid of LDA delivery logs by setting deliver_log_format = All this does is produce an empty log message e.g. Apr 16 01:22:05 dserver dovecot: lda(user): Timo, would you consider inclusion of this patch which will skip logging deliveries if deliver_log_format is empty: ---

This adds new APIs for running a local NBD server and connecting to it using systemd socket activation (instead of stdin/stdout). This includes interop tests against nbdkit and qemu-nbd which I believe are the only NBD servers supporting socket activation. (If we find others then we can add more interop tests in future.) The upstream spec for systemd socket activation is here:

Hi, I want my Samba 2.2.4 Machine to join my nt-domain. When I try this I recognize that samba seems to use a wrong IP-Adress! I have no Idea where this wrong adress comes from!? Any Ideas? --- cut --- # /usr/local/samba/bin/smbpasswd -D 10 -j CAD -r bsadpp01 -Uadministrator ... a lot of text ... Adding chars 0xe7 0xe8 (l->u = True) (u->l = True) Adding chars 0x9c 0x0 (l->u = False)

This adds new APIs for running a local NBD server and connecting to it using systemd socket activation (instead of stdin/stdout). This includes interop tests against nbdkit and qemu-nbd which I believe are the only NBD servers supporting socket activation. (If we find others then we can add more interop tests in future.) The upstream spec for systemd socket activation is here:

I was a little surprised to find that LIBNBD_TLS_ALLOW worked out of the box, so I had to examine the logs whereupon I saw the magic message ... libnbd: debug: nbd1: nbd_connect_command: server refused TLS (policy), continuing with unencrypted connection I don't believe this path has ever been tested before. It's possible the tests could be improved if they actually checked for this

Now that we have implemented systemd socket activation, we can use this to run qemu-nbd in tests. The first patch leaves some dead code around (the -DSERVE_OVER_TCP=1 path). It's possible we might want to use this to test against a putative future NBD server that only supports TCP, but on the other hand maybe we should just remove it. Tests & valgrind still pass for me. Rich.

An incremental improvement on top of listing exports. I still think it's worth experimenting with revisiting how our API for list mode should actually work [1] (so that we can reuse a single connection for both grabbing the list and finally using NBD_OPT_GO), but this change was easier to whip together while still thinking about that. [1]

This commit adds a simple test of qemu-storage-daemon (QSD). On the basis that QSD is just qemu-nbd in new clothes this is only a simple test, not complete coverage. Nor does it test the unique features of QSD like being able to use QMP to create new server instances. Unfortunately QSD is not yet stable upstream. This version works with qemu 5.1.0 but at least two of the command line

If the user calls nbd_kill_subprocess, we shouldn't kill the process again when we close the handle (since the process has likely gone and we might be killing a different process). --- lib/handle.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/handle.c b/lib/handle.c index 2af25fe..5ad818e 100644 --- a/lib/handle.c +++ b/lib/handle.c @@ -315,6 +315,8 @@

Hello With the legacy pass manager, we could invoke a Function Pass within the runOnModule() of a Module Pass by simply passing the Function reference to the getAnalysis<>() method. Can the same be achieved using the new Pass Manager? I am writing a Module Pass which requires to access analyses for the different functions, and I need the new pass manager because I need different copies of

v1 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-September/thread.html#00337 v2: - Drop the first patch. - Hopefully fix the multiple issues with fork-safety and general behaviour on error paths. Note this requires execvpe for which there seems to be no equivalent on FreeBSD, except some kind of tedious path parsing (but can we assign to environ?) Rich.

[top.jpg] [left_image.jpg] * Combination of retail and residential units making this ideal to live, work and play * Only 4km from Cape Town CBD * Delayed transfer: end of 2009 * Mix of bachelor,1 and 2 bedrooms * Large sun-deck and braai area * Enclosed sun-lounge * Small gym area * High rental demand and rental return

Hi All I have installed Samba 3 under RHEL v4, with LDAP support for the authentication and as a PDC Domain, it seems everything works fine, but the only problem was the network browser list. We have a different subnet 192.168.X., 192.168.Y., 192.168.Z., etc..., Samba local browser works fine, but the remote subnet and workgroup are inaccessible, I double check the nmbd logs, there an error which

Hi all, I am trying to use the dependence analyzer in a pass that I am writing and I was surprised to see an incorrect behavior when I try to query DependenceInfo for dependences between instructions. Specifically, if the two instructions are loads/stores accessing an array in a loop, the depend() method would return a dependence regardless of the order of instructions specified. (i.e. if the two

Hello All I am looking for an LLVM pass that is able to detect branches whose condition is known if they are reached. To illustrate what I mean, I attached a screenshot showing a partial CFG of a function. The branch in basic block for.cond.cleanup3 tests the same condition as the branch in the entry block, and has the same target BB if the condition is false. Also, if you inspect the graph