similar to: Windows XP truncating last share name?

Hi folks, I have successfuly migrated a WinNT 4.0 Domain to a Debian server with Samba3+Ldap following the Samba-3 by Example guide from John H. Terpstra (an impressive good guide) and The Linux Samba-OpenLADP Howto from Jerome Tournier & Olivier Lemaire. The domain holds about 800 accounts. There are WinNT servers, WinXP and Win95 clients belonging to it. WinNT servers and WinXP clients

Hi folks, I have been able to migrate a WinNT4 domain to a Samba3 PDC domain using openldap as a backend and smbldap-tools to vampire the WinNT4 domain (pretty much following Samba3 by Example and documentation in smbldap project by IDEALX). Nevertheless, all 600 users migraged from the WinNT4 domain have attributes like these on the ldap database: userPassword: {crypt}x

Hi folks, I am trying to deploy an LDAP based Samba3 PDC, migrated from an old WinNT4 Domain to support roaming profile for new WinXP clients. But I do not want a full roaming profile. AFAIK WinXP profiles tends to grow. If possible, I would like to roam only the desktop settings, and maybe the navigator (IE or Firefox) configuration. Another important (I believe) information is that our WinXP

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5162 Summary: using iconv with pre7 chops last special character in filenames Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

hello all, i hope someone can help me out with this little nasty. i have openssh 2.3.0p1 installed on some hp-ux 11.00 boxes and a single linux box. i'm trying desperately to replace trusted hosts on these machines with something a little more secure. running some remote commands between the hp boxes, i'm getting different results with ssh than with remsh. root at hp1# remsh hp2 cat

I''ve got a fairly basic problem here that I''m hoping there is an easy solution for. I have a chunk of html code that I want to truncate to a given length... say 20 characters or so. If I use the ''truncate'' helper function I end up with unbalanced tags. For example. <a href=www.someplace.com>A really long string of words</a> becomes <a

Lista dos aprovados em vestibular Junqueiro: Vale de S?o Domingos: ANA L?CIA MENDES DOS SANTOS, LUANA FELIX BIE, FRANCISCO PAULO DE OLIVEIRA MESQUITA, POLLIANA BRASILIANA DE SIQUEIRA, JO?O CARLOS MOREIRA DE CARVALHO, DANIELE SILVA OLIVEIRA, MARIA JOS? BATISTA LEITE, J?SSICA MAYARA P. PAULINO. SOLANGE FERREIRA ANDRADE, BRENA RODRIGUES MACIEL, LUIS FABRICIO DE FREITAS SOUZA, H?LIO BARROS FERREIRA,

Hi, In PromoteIntOp_STORE, why can we not promote a value and generate a truncating store if the incoming store is a truncating store? Naively, I can't see why we can promote the incoming value to a legal type and then generate a truncating store. For example, one has incoming code that produces an i16 via some operation and does a truncating store the result of that value in i8.

I am trying to convert a string to a double using "as.numeric" However, R is truncating the results! Options(digits) is set to 7. Can anyone shed some light on this? Thanks! > b[1] [1] "116.28125" > summary(b[1]) Length Class Mode 1 character character > c <- as.numeric(b[1]) > c [1] 116.2812 -- View this message in context:

For example, truncating store of an i32 to i6. My assumption was that this should write the low six bits of the i32 to somewhere in memory. Should the top 24 bits of a corresponding 32 bit region of memory be unchanged, zero, undefined? Should the two bits that would round the i6 up to a byte be preserved, zero, undefined? I can't write six bits directly so am trying to determine what set

Hi Mon Ping, > In PromoteIntOp_STORE, why can we not promote a value and generate a > truncating store if the incoming store is a truncating store? as far as I can see you can just remove the assertion. Ciao, Duncan.

Hi Akira, On 01/06/12 02:27, Hatanaka, Akira wrote: > In LegalizeDAG.cpp, truncating stores are custom-lowered in line 1314-1317: > > 1314 case TargetLowering::Custom: > 1315 ReplaceNode(SDValue(Node, 0), > 1316 TLI.LowerOperation(SDValue(Node, 0), DAG)); > 1317 break; > > Is there a reason it doesn't check whether the

Hi, there was discussion on "truncating aggregation output only" (http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=19008) on DTrace forum. From what was discussed the aggregation options like aggsortrev, aggsortkey, aggsortpos, aggsortkeypos are already available (Thanks Bryan!). I am wondering what are current plans for ''aggtop'' option (or

On 9/15/2017 5:49 AM, Jon Chesterfield via llvm-dev wrote: > For example, truncating store of an i32 to i6. My assumption was that > this should write the low six bits of the i32 to somewhere in memory. > > Should the top 24 bits of a corresponding 32 bit region of memory be > unchanged, zero,  undefined? Unchanged. > Should the two bits that would round the i6 up to a byte

On 09/15/2017 10:55 AM, Friedman, Eli via llvm-dev wrote: > On 9/15/2017 5:49 AM, Jon Chesterfield via llvm-dev wrote: >> For example, truncating store of an i32 to i6. My assumption was that this should write the low six bits of the i32 to somewhere in memory. >> >> Should the top 24 bits of a corresponding 32 bit region of memory be unchanged, zero, undefined? > >

In LegalizeDAG.cpp, truncating stores are custom-lowered in line 1314-1317: 1314 case TargetLowering::Custom: 1315 ReplaceNode(SDValue(Node, 0), 1316 TLI.LowerOperation(SDValue(Node, 0), DAG)); 1317 break; Is there a reason it doesn't check whether the SDValue returned from TargetLowering::LowerOperation is null before it replaces the

I'm in a situation where a rather lengthy /etc/issue file is used to state standard disclaimers of acceptable use. I noticed that OpenSSH 3.7 and above started truncating this to 1023 characters; the ssh client, that is. Is this is simple variable change that wouldn't break anything? I'll look through the code, but it might be wise to make this buffer a bit larger since many

On Sun, 13 Apr 2003, Guy Harris gharris-at-sonic.net |TCPdump Workers| wrote: > It is probably not impossible to add a "pcap_dump_open_append()" > function to libpcap that would do that, and, given that function, one > could probably add a new command-line flag to get tcpdump to append to > a capture file rather than truncating and overwriting it. That would be very handy,

Hello, I am relatively new to R and have a rudimentary question, I think. How does one truncate the number of digits displayed after the decimal when viewing the results of analyses? My apologies if this question has been answered previously, I was not able to find references very easily. Thank you in advance, Matt [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, Consider the following example. > a = c(1,2,3); b = c(4,5,6); c = cbind(a,b); c[(2 < c[,1]) & (c[,1] < 4),] a b 3 6 So, the idea is to select rows for which the value in the first column is between 2 and 4. This works, however, I don't like having to reference a explicitly in this fashion, and just wondered if there was a preferred way to accomplish the same thing.