similar to: problem with kernel oplock

I need to temporarily disable a share for a few days, I remember there was an entry I could add to the share definition to temporarily disable the share (I think it was disabled=true or enabled=false) but I can't remember what it was for sure, nor can I find it in the manual. what is it ?

(Samba 3.0.21c / kernel 2.4.27 / Debian Sarge) Hello, One of my user open a file (located on a SAMBA server) in its application, and when he tries to save it, he gets a "share violation" error. (other people have this problem too). This error happens since I upgraded the SAMBA server from 3.0.14a to 3.0.21c. smbstatus for this file: 32613 DENY_WRITE 0x20089 RDONLY

I've a situation where file locking does not seem to functioning. I have the following entries in my smb.conf file: *** /etc/samba/smb.conf *** linux # testparm -v | grep lock Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf <snip> Warning: Service printers defines a print command, but print command parameter is ignored when using CUPS libraries. Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC Press enter

I am running two Fedora 13 servers, one as a Samba PDC and the other as a BDC. For the past week I have been tracing a series of issues which may or may not be related to Samba 3.5.4. Here is one problem that I am tracking and need help from the list with suggestions. >From a wireshark trace between my Samba server and an XP client I am seeing the following error status returned for up to a

I'm running Samba 3.4.7 on Ubuntu 10.04. This is a recent upgrade and we've starting experience a sporadic problem after this upgrade. When users are browsing through Windows Explorer they sometimes run across folders that appear as unassociated files. This requires the user to click the 'Refresh' button in Windows Explorer to properly see the folders. The files and folders are

I posted a problem with oplock previously, but am guessing it goto lost in an earlier thread with the same subject line, so here goes another shot: Using Samba 3.0.22 on a Gentoo box (kernel 2.6.15) I've a situation where file locking does not seem to be functioning as expected, in that more than one user can open and write to a file without any notifications being displayed about the file

I just upgraded my Member Server to 3.2.4 on Ubuntu. I have a permissions problem. Users can create files on the Samba shares but they cannot delete files. Here is a typical share definition. [Testing] comment = Test for Samba path = /files/test browseable = yes writeable = yes create mask = 0764 directory mask = 0775 On the Linux side I can do

I'm running Samba 2.2.8a on SuSE Linux 8.1 with kernel 2.4.19. I have a share defined by this on a web server to allow members of the jamigos group to edit web pages. [users] comment = User Web Pages path = /home valid users = @jamigos read only = No create mask = 0664 force create mode = 0664 directory mask = 0775

Since upgrading from 3.0.24 to 3.0.25a this past weekend, network drive connections are randomly being closed and immediately reopened. This creates "Delayed write failed" errors for Firefox and Thunderbird, various errors for Outlook with its PST files on network drives, and errors from programs like InDesign that "The network connection was lost for the file, or the file was

Hi List, Second attempt to get this issue diagnosed and solved. Samba Version 3.0.28el4 CentOS 4.7 The behavior is as follows when accessing Fox Pro dbf files. Users can access the files through the Fox Pro command interface without issues,when they choose a graphical environment (windows explore of the windows file open gui) the system returns an access denied message on the first

Hi Guys, I am trying samba 3.0.6 for the moment, but I found some issues sometime. When I try to create a new file, I get error 'Unable to create the file 'New Text Document'. The specified network name is no longer available", though I found actually that file is created on the server. Also I checked the process of forked smbd, it exited and a new connection is created. Please

I'm not sure if this is a known issue or not. # uname -a Linux XXXXXXXXXXXX 2.4.21-9.ELsmp #1 SMP Thu Jan 8 16:54:23 EST 2004 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux # cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS release 3 (Taroon Update 1) # vmstat 5 procs memory swap io system cpu r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us

Hi all I am fairly new to samba and XP. I have a client who we set up a samba server for, they are complaining about documents taking about 30 secs -2-3mins to open but only sometimes (it can be very frequent). I have seen this and captured a piece of the log file I wonder if any one can make any sense of it... I have been looking on the net and trying various things all day but to no avail...

Hi, O Wise Ones, I have a number of machines running samba on Fedora 3 as member servers of a windows domain. They authenticate with Active Directory on the Windows PDC (Windows Server 2003 as part of Small Business Server 2003) and provide file and print sharing services. All has been working perfectly for months. When I applied SP1 for Windows Server 2003, authentication stopped working.

Hello, In regards to this thread: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2005-September/111158.html I might be seeing a similar compatibility with this call is on Virtuozzo based system. > cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Linux release 9 (Shrike) > uname -a Linux hostname 2.6.8-022stab078.9-enterprise #1 SMP Thu Jun 8 12:38:51 MSD 2006 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux > mount /dev/vzfs on /

Hello, I have problem with Samba 4.4.3. I'd like to use SMB 3.02 file shares as shared storage for Hyper-V in Windows Server 2012 R2. I am able to create Virtual Machine on Samba share using guest access, but when I try to start VM I'm getting the following error: "An error occurred while attempting to start the selected virtual machine(s). 'New Virtual Machine' could not

Hi, What I wanted to do was to export an FUSE based filesystem mounted on linux to a windows box using samba. I can browse and navigate the fuse filesystem without problems on the linux box. With smbd running I can even navigate the filesystem using smbclient. Unfortunately when I try to access the exported file system from WinNT the mountpoint of the filesystem shows up as a zero size file

Hi, A day or so after starting samba, some daemons (diferent forks) begin to hang. Then, the WinXP clients hang too completely. When I try to figure out what is happen, I see that smbd daemons hangs always in a fcntl64() call: # strace -p 6414 Process 6414 attached - interrupt to quit fcntl64(14, F_SETLKW64, {type=F_WRLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=3684, len=1} <unfinished ...> Process 6414

Some times I have in log : [2004/02/04 12:00:06, 5] lib/gencache.c:gencache_init(59) Opening cache file at /var/lock/samba/gencache.tdb [2004/02/04 12:00:06, 5] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(724) tdb(unnamed): tdb_brlock failed (fd=12) at offset 4 rw_type=1 lck_type=13: Ressource temporairement non disponible [2004/02/04 12:00:06, 5] libsmb/namecache.c:namecache_enable(58) namecache_enable:

Hi we have samba 3.0.14a on FreeBSD 5.4. We tried with different kind of locking and oplocks (both enabled and disabled). If we try to copy from a Windows XP client a file larger than 3g, we get these error: Cannot copy XXX. The specified network name is no longer available. We traced this problem in the logs (log level 10) and we got this error ------------ [2006/09/19 10:29:41, 5]