similar to: samba share problem

On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Gary Dale <garydale at torfree.net> wrote: They already have full rwx privileges. I'm not sure if that worked or not, > or if it was something else I've done since last night but currently the > profiles seem to being saved even without the share being connected. > getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file:

Hi Gary, My environment is FreeBSD 5.4 , Samba 3.0.12 and the users are = authenticated by AD server(that is the "password server" points to this = server) It seems no "groupmap" command on freebsd, How I can solve this issue? Thanks! Liu -----=D3=CA=BC=FE=D4=AD=BC=FE----- =B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: Gary Dale [mailto:garydale@torfree.net]=20 =B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4:

Could you try giving domain users rwx control of profile folder this way: setfacl -m g:users:rwx On Jul 4, 2015 1:53 PM, "Gary Dale" <garydale at torfree.net> wrote: > On 04/07/15 04:22 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > >> On 04/07/15 00:58, Gary Dale wrote: >> >>> On 03/07/15 01:21 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> >>>> On 03/07/15 17:45, Gary

I've been at this for hours now and am still not getting it to work. I've been through the lists trying to find an answer and so far as I can tell, everything is configured OK. Obviously it's not, but I'm stuck. I recently installed Squeeze on my home server, overwriting a Lenny installation. I've been able to add my NT (Windows XP/Pro) domain accounts back in and pdbedit

I am having problems getting my 64-bit Debian Squeeze (Xen version 4.0, Linux Kernel 2.6.32) dom0 to recognize a harddrive connected to a secondary sata controller. My motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 and has two sata controllers. The first is controlled by an Intel X79 chipset and the second is controlled by a Marvell 88SE9172 chip. During the initial install of Debian everything is fine and

I've set up NT domains from scratch and things work. However, in this case I vampired the old settings over to my new Samba PDC from a W2K server which I then removed from the network. Everything almost works, except ... The main thing is that I can't seem to change the domain passwords from the XP Pro workstations. Normally you do Ctrl-Alt-Del and select change password, then fill

On 2023-04-11 04:15, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 11/04/2023 00:19, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >> On 2023-04-05 09:56, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >>> On 2023-04-04 19:36, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >>>> On 2023-04-02 02:49, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 02/04/2023 04:54, Gary Dale via

On 2023-04-11 10:12, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 11/04/2023 13:36, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >> On 2023-04-11 04:15, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> What 'Debian distribution-specific' installation did you follow ? >> The one linked to in AD DC wiki. > > Where abouts is this link ? > I checked here: >

On 11/04/2023 13:36, Gary Dale via samba wrote: > On 2023-04-11 04:15, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> What 'Debian distribution-specific' installation did you follow ? > The one linked to in AD DC wiki. Where abouts is this link ? I checked here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_an_Active_Directory_Domain_Controller But couldn't

I am having problems getting my 64-bit Debian Squeeze (Xen version 4.0, Linux Kernel 2.6.32) dom0 to pass a Gigabyte HD 5450 graphics card to an HVM 64-bit Arch Linux domU. I have two Gigabyte HD 5450 graphics cards connected to my Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 motherboard. I can pass the secondary card (the one the bios doesn’t show up on) to an HVM 32-bit Windows XP domU (I thought that would be the hard

Back to square 1! I stripped out my unsuccessful attempts to get Samba working with LDAP on my Debian Sarge server and am back with a tdbsam backend. I actually tried to purge as much of the old Samba & LDAP as I could then reinstalled fresh. This included removing the Windows groups and users and even the old tdbsam data. Unfortunately, I'm back where I started - users can't

I'm trying to set up a new server to replace my previous domain controller/file&print server on my home network. My old server was running Debian/Etch on a 32bit sempron system with two HDs. The new one is running an old 64bit single-core processor and 3 HDs configured into multiple RAID 1 and 5 arrays (/boot as RAID 1 and /, /home, swap and a /backup directory as RAID 5). The new server

On 2023-04-12 15:11, Christian Naumer via samba wrote: > Hi, > I have been looking at this thread a while now. > First I think what Rowland and myself misunderstood is that you are not using a DC as a Fileserver ( in the beginning I thought you did. That you have a sysvol share on a domain member confused me) so I think so e of the comments from Rowland do not apply here. > >

Hi, I have been looking at this thread a while now. First I think what Rowland and myself misunderstood is that you are not using a DC as a Fileserver ( in the beginning I thought you did. That you have a sysvol share on a domain member confused me) so I think so e of the comments from Rowland do not apply here. Second, if I reread the thread and look at the description of your problem I think

On 2023-04-12 02:48, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 11/04/2023 21:19, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >> On 2023-04-11 15:09, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 11/04/2023 19:05, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >>> >>>>> I will say it again, you are using a Samba AD DC as a fileserver, >>>>> this means that

Hi, I am having trouble using constrOptim. My target is to do a portfolio optimization and there some constraints have to be fulfilled. 1) The weight of each share of the portfolio has to be greater than 0 2) The sum of these weights has to be 1 I am able to fulfill either the first or the second constraint but not both. One simple way would be to fulfill the first constraint by using optim as

Hi all, The C++11 (& C11) compare_exchange functions with explicit memory order allow you to specify two sets of semantics, one for when the exchange actually happens and one for when it fails. Unfortunately, at the moment the LLVM IR "cmpxchg" instruction only has one ordering, which means we get sub-optimal codegen. This probably affects all architectures which use

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking

Hello everyone! I am currently running Samba 2.0.7 on a RedHat Linux 6.1 box. My user home directories on this box are NFS mounted from another server. Quotas have been enabled on this server and rpc.rquotad is running. On Linux, I can see the user's quotas via a quota -v <username> :- testing:~# quota -v try Disk quotas for user try (uid 1006): Filesystem blocks quota

Hello! I was using samba-2.2.0-alpha3 (and just about earlier versions as well) and had no problems with getting W2K users to login to my domain using their username/password. However, after upgrading to samba-2.2.0, when W2K users tried to login using their username/password, W2K pops up a small dialog box in the middle of the screen that says - Your account has been disabled, please