similar to: sam-fs and samba (copy while staging / timeout)

we have setup a two level proxy configuration for our zimbra server: [ dovecot 2.2.12 (imap proxy mode) ] V [ nginx (imap proxy mode) ] V [ zimbra imap server] and it does not work ... after tying a login, the connection just hangs and ends after 30 seconds with a timeout. - if I try again rightaway in the same dovecot connection, the login goes though without trouble.

Hi List, I have updated my rsync fadvise patch which stops rsync from ousting all your other data from cache when running large jobs. I have also written an article about the whole issue. http://insights.oetiker.ch/linux/fadvise.html cheers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten http://it.oetiker.ch tobi@oetiker.ch ++41 62 213 9902

Hi List, I am using rsync for hard-link backup. I found that there is a major problem with frequent backup filling up the file system cache with all the data from the files being backed up. The effect is that all the other 'sensible' data in the cache gets thrown out in the process. This is rather unfortunate as the performance of the system becomes very bad after running rsync. Some

Hi Net, How can I enable debug messages in the imap-proxy client? Trying to figure why the imap-proxy mode does not work towards ngnix. specifically, how can i set conn->client->set.debug in ./src/lib-imap-client/imapc-connection.c cheers tobi -- Tobi Oetiker, OETIKER+PARTNER AG, Aarweg 15 CH-4600 Olten, Switzerland www.oetiker.ch tobi at oetiker.ch +41 62 775 9902 *** We are hiring

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:30:49PM -0400, Justin Holewinski wrote: > On 07/27/2012 01:01 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I would like to try to keep the staging area discussion going. There > >seems to be a general consensus that a staging area for backends and also > >new features would be acceptable for the LLVM project. What actions > >are required

On Jul 27, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > >> We also need to come up with a plan regarding cutting releases. When >> 3.2 is branched, will all "staged" back-ends be removed? Or will >> they be left in the distribution so interested parties can build >> them? >> > > I can't really think of any disadvantages to keeping staged backends

On Jul 27, 2012, at 7:05 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Jul 27, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: >> >>> We also need to come up with a plan regarding cutting releases. When >>> 3.2 is branched, will all "staged" back-ends be removed? Or will >>> they be left in the distribution so interested parties can build

I have been testing the SNAP-2000082900 on solaris ... earlier I wrote that the 'connection dies on exit of x11 forwarded motif application' bug was solved with this release ... unfortunately further testing showed that it just did not occur on the machine I tested. All our other machines still show it ... cheers tobi -- ______ __ _ /_ __/_ / / (_) Oetiker, Timelord &

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:54:21PM -0400, Justin Holewinski wrote: > On Jul 27, 2012, at 7:05 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 27, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > >> > >>> We also need to come up with a plan regarding cutting releases. When > >>> 3.2 is branched, will all "staged" back-ends be

On 07/27/2012 01:01 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to try to keep the staging area discussion going. There > seems to be a general consensus that a staging area for backends and also > new features would be acceptable for the LLVM project. What actions > are required to make the staging area a reality? Is more discussion > needed? Is anyone willing to

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7004 Summary: Use posix_fadvise to free cached file contents when done Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: ted at

Dear OpenSSH gurus! ;-) I recently upgraded from "OpenSSH 2.1.1p4" to "OpenSSH 2.3.0p1" on my Linux 2.2.17 box with OpenSSL 0.9.5a (RedHat 7.0). According to the "ChangeLog", there was a change in SIGPIPE handling: | 20000930 | [...] | - (djm) Ignore SIGPIPEs from serverloop to child. Fixes crashes with | very short lived X connections. Bug report from

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9560 Summary: drop-cache option Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: colundrum at gmail.com QAContact: rsync-qa at

Hello, i have found, that major distros (especially opensuse) ship their rsync packages with a lot of patches which i don`t find in the official rsync-patches git. Maybe there is a reason for that or i missed something or looked wrong, but for convenience/transparency i have compiled a list of those and ask if it would make sense to put them into the official rsync patches git, as most of them

Hi, I would like to try to keep the staging area discussion going. There seems to be a general consensus that a staging area for backends and also new features would be acceptable for the LLVM project. What actions are required to make the staging area a reality? Is more discussion needed? Is anyone willing to volunteer to be the "Code Owner" for the staging area, to help move the

On Jul 20, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Tom Stellard wrote: > The goals of the staging area will be: > 1. Facilitate communication between the LLVM project and backend > developers > 2. Ensure that new backends meet LLVM standards > 3. Give the backend more exposure to users and prospective developers FWIW, I really like this idea or concept, but we have to be careful for it to be done

-----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Lattner Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 1:18 PM To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Staged LLVM emulator On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Patrick Meredith wrote: > Were there ever any plans to make a staged emulator that only JIT's hot > functions

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:21:57AM -0400, Justin Holewinski wrote: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 20, 2012, at 8:51 AM, Tom Stellard wrote: > > > The goals of the staging area will be: > > > 1. Facilitate communication between the LLVM project and backend > > > developers > > >

On 4/25/19 3:11 AM, Pages, Herve wrote: > Hi, > > I was playing around with inotifywait (great tool!) to see the new > staged installation of source packages in action. In one terminal I'm > monitoring the create/delete/move events of the installation library with: > > ? inotifywait -m --timefmt '%F %T' --format '%T -- %w %e %f' -e create > -e delete

Dear Michael, my package has setOldClass("inla") and the NAMESPACE contains exportClasses(inla) and importFrom(INLA, inla.posterior.sample) the old version of INLA uses the S3 class "inla" but does not export it. the new version of INLA has setOldClass("inla") and the NAMESPACE contains exportClasses(inla) installing my package in combination with an older INLA