similar to: full_audit on Samba 3.0.20 vs 3.0.25

Hey List, I was wondering if and how one would go about tracking file activity on a Samba server, for basic auditing purposes. I'd ideally like to see what files where edited, by whom and when. I've done some RTFM and a bit of searching around the 'net, but haven't found anything yet. Even pointers to documentation on the subject would be welcome. Thanks in advance for

Hi, I'm using full_audit vfs module and I'm seeing a lot of duplicated messages in log file. Why does it happens ? How can I configure de smb.conf not to log duplicated information ? Duplicated log: Jan 4 13:27:50 server smbd_audit: [2015/01/04 13:27:50|semirames|samba-admin|192.168.0.3|setores]|pread|ok|Atendimento/James.txt Jan 4 13:27:50 server smbd_audit: [2015/01/04

Folks, I tried using full_audit on Samba 3.0.28 by putting the following lines on smb.conf (global section): vfs objects = full_audit full_audit:facility = LOCAL2 full_audit:priority = WARN full_audit:prefix = %u|%m|%S full_audit:success = rename rmdir unlink write full_audit:failure = none My log says: Dec 29 13:57:07 lua smbd_audit: [2008/12/29 13:57:07, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(45) Dec

Hallo, I?m using samba 4.11 from sernet and the vfs object full_audit. After update samba to 4.12 from sernet full_audit is broken and the shares with full_audit are not accessible. Can anyone tell me please how to install python 3 on centos7 while the Centos system needs python 2 but samba sould use python3? Thanks in advance, Peter

Hi all, I had implemented on one of my shares vfs full_audit module. It was working with Samba 3.0.x without any problems. After migration to Samba 3.4.3 this function doesn't work anymore - when it's enabled then share isn't accessible from users (it's visible but getting error when trying to connect to it). Audit and extd_audit vfs's are working fine, but they

I'm trying to set up a samba server to audit only the file operations that I care about, which are create, modify, delete, and rename (for files and folders). I've got the full_audit vfs module working well, except that I haven't been able to figure out what to set it to log (in the "full_audit:success" setting) to include file creation and modification. If I log

I'm having issues enabling VFS full_audit & msdfs. It works great on my non-root DFS servers. On my DFS root server, enabled full_audit will break DFS links. If found some reports of this from searching, but the users appear to have resolved the issue from upgrading (to older versions that I am using). I'm running Samba 3.6.9-167 on CentOS 6. Here is an except from the samba server,

Hello alAl, after update of our test server to 4.12.1 from 4.11 it crashes. If the vfs module is removed from the config everthing works as before. Logs from the crash see here: .0.31:445] Apr 16 13:36:47 lx-sv-03 smbd_audit[6263]: [2020/04/16 13:36:47.546559, 0] ../../source3/lib/util.c:830(smb_panic_s3) Apr 16 13:36:47 lx-sv-03 smbd_audit[6263]: PANIC (pid 6263): vfs_full_audit.c: name table

When VFS full_audit is activated the server doesn't allow users to write changes in any file. The log vfs:10 shows: Jan 12 22:22:00 loginserver smbd_audit: aaaa.bbbb|192.168.23.10|get_real_filename|fail (Operation not supported)|/Novo Documento de Texto.txt->(null) Jan 12 22:22:00 loginserver smbd_audit: aaaa.bbbb|192.168.23.10|fchmod_acl|fail (No data available)|Novo Documento de

Hi all, I'm running debian 6, x64, stock samba 3.5.6, various clients. As soon as I enable the full_audit vfs object in smb.conf, my msdfs links stop working with: - INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 and - failed to get vfs_handle->data! in the samba logfiles. Is there a known problem with this combination? I'm guessing that this combination is supposed to work..? I have a level 10 log

Hi, I'm currently running Samba 3.0.22 (on an Ubuntu 6.06 [Dapper] server). I have VFS full_audit set up successfully to log user activity using the LOCAL6 facility. I also have syslog configured to redirect all messages from this facility to /var/log/samba/log.audit This is working fine. However, I've recently been getting lines in /var/log/syslog that look like they're coming

Running Samba 4.16.4 and having problems getting the vfs_full_audit module to send anything to syslog. I can get it to log to a file, but nothing happens when using syslog only. Configuration looks like: [global] ... log level = 4 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m logging = syslog at 4 ... [foobar] path = /foobar vfs objects = full_audit streams_xattr acl_xattr full_audit:priority = INFO

In case anyone is interested, I found the problem. I was running samba in a container that did not have any syslog service (rsyslogd or syslog-ng) running. By default, samba syslog only sends messages to the system's syslog socket and there was nothing listening on it so the messages just got dropped. I put rsyslogd in the container and configured it to listen on the syslog socket and am

Greetings, I am running audits on a restricted file share for smbd 4.9.5-Debian. Messages go to syslog via local5. I am mostly interested in file access and modification, plus the occasional failed connect. The only operations that yield any results appear to be 'opendir' and 'open'. Unfortunately, 'open' is chatty to an extend as to render logging useless. I am getting

Dear Samba people, I am going to upgrade a Samba domain member server, which is a member of an AD domain. Its Windows user-ids and group-ids are stored on 2 Open-LDAP servers. I have look in the mailinglists and in the docs, but have not found any good examples of how to change the old syntax into the new(in 3.0.25). Is there a place where I can find some examples ? Our old idmap config lines

ryan i see and review my configuration a lot of times searching a error but nothing... I thinking to reinstall all server in a linux box for test. the actual samba+ldap server is a Unix Solaris 10 X86 /usr/local/samba/bin/net getlocalsid SID for domain NEPTUNE is: S-1-5-21-1628075765-904855948-1163074499 smbldap.conf wthout "comments"

On Sun, 6 May 2018 20:05:20 +1000 Robin G <robinghere3 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > here is the smb.conf. All shares have the full_audit > > [global] > workgroup = RESOLVS > netbios name = DC1 > security = USER > obey pam restrictions = yes > local master = yes > domain master = yes > preferred

Hi Rowland, Thanks for taking the time to look at this. I will post the log 10 output a bit later. Btw, what logs with log level 10 are you interested in? Here’s my samba config with sensitive info replaced with placeholders: [global] access based share enum = yes browseable = yes comment = <COMMENT> create mask = 0660 directory mask =

On 06. aug. 2018 16:37, Oleg Cherkasov via samba wrote: > On 06. aug. 2018 15:15, Oleg Cherkasov via samba wrote: >> >> This morning three of our FreeBSD-11.1-p11 servers with Samba 4.7.7 >> installations started to ignore ACL settings and reject user access to >> shares.  All three servers are members of DC running on Windows Server >> 2008R2.  Everything has

On Sat, 5 May 2018 11:11:21 -0300 "Ethy H. Brito via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sat, 5 May 2018 23:40:47 +1000 > Robin G via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > ... > > > > full_audit:prefix = %u|%I|%S > > full_audit:failure = none > > full_audit:success = mkdir rmdir read pread write pwrite