similar to: safe_strcpy errors from winbindd (Samba 3.0.25b)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "safe_strcpy errors from winbindd (Samba 3.0.25b)"

2005 May 02
1
Problems with ipsec roadwarrior
Hello, i have got a problem with the configuration of an roadwarrior ipsec VPN tunnel with shorewall 2.2.3. I read the Shorewall Kernel 2.6 IPSEC and folowed the instructions to that point where to modify the hosts with the folowing parameters: vpn eth0:0.0.0.0/0 ipsec But i have got an entry like net eth0:0.0.0.0/0 even in the same file: If i
2008 Aug 06
2
software runs in a loop [mathe coach]
I wants to start a win Prog called "Mathe Coach" with wine. And yes I know that there are ohter and better Progs for linux, but it has to be that one....not my decision :-) The occuring problem is that wine hangs in a loop and i can't make neither head nor tail of the debug messages (the file is over 10 MB large, and i abborted wine after a few seconds to avoid larger files) here a
2013 Mar 27
0
OCFS2 issues reports, any ideads or patches, Thanks
Mar 27 10:54:08 cvk-7 kernel: [ 361.374376] INFO: task kworker/u:1:73 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Mar 27 10:54:08 cvk-7 kernel: [ 361.374383] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. Mar 27 10:54:08 cvk-7 kernel: [ 361.374389] kworker/u:1 D ffffffff81806240 0 73 2 0x00000000 Mar 27 10:54:08 cvk-7 kernel: [ 361.374395]
2013 Sep 03
3
Is virsh blockcommit supported? Thanks a lot
I had test the command virsh blockcommit, but it failed, with the libvirt version 1.1.0, and qemu version 1.6.0. Is this feature being developing? Thanks root at cvk-31:/vms/images# virsh -v 1.1.0 root at cvk-31:/vms/images# qemu-img -V qemu-img version 1.6.0, Copyright (c) 2004-2008 Fabrice Bellard usage: qemu-img command [command options] root at cvk-31:/vms/images# virsh blockcommit Vmtest
2013 Sep 04
2
Is virsh blockcommit supported? Thanks a lot
Hi, I have another question, when I do the blockcommit command and get the result " Top image as the active layer is currently unsupported ", is it being developed? root@cvk-31:/vms/images# virsh blockcommit Vmtest /vms/images/Vmtest1;echo $? error: internal error unable to execute QEMU command 'block-commit': Top image as the active layer is currently unsupported 1 But as I
2013 Sep 03
0
Re: Is virsh blockcommit supported? Thanks a lot
[dropping libvir-list - this is a usage question, not a development question] On 09/02/2013 11:29 PM, Guozhonghua wrote: > I had test the command virsh blockcommit, but it failed, with the libvirt version 1.1.0, and qemu version 1.6.0. > Is this feature being developing? Thanks The feature is supported, but you have to use it correctly. In particular, your backing chain MUST label the
2006 Jun 07
1
knn - 10 fold cross validation
Hi, I was trying to get the optimal 'k' for the knn. To do this I was using the following function : knn.cvk <- function(datmat, cl, k = 2:9) { datmatT <- (datmat) cv.err <- cl.pred <- c() for (i in k) { newpre <- as.vector(knn.cv(datmatT, cl, k = i)) cl.pred <- cbind(cl.pred, newpre) cv.err <- c(cv.err, sum(cl != newpre)) }
2013 Sep 04
0
Re: Is virsh blockcommit supported? Thanks a lot
On 09/03/2013 06:56 PM, Guozhonghua wrote: > Hi, > > I have another question, when I do the blockcommit command and get the result " Top image as the active layer is currently unsupported ", is it being developed? > root@cvk-31:/vms/images# virsh blockcommit Vmtest /vms/images/Vmtest1;echo $? > error: internal error unable to execute QEMU command 'block-commit':
2005 Jul 02
6
Loadbalancing how to ? ? ? ?
I have 2 ADSL ad1 and ad2 , one PC for my firewall and some deamon on it with 3 ethernet : eth0 connect to my LAN ( 192.168.60.0/24 ) and 2 other connect to ad1 and ad2 |eth1 (10.0.1.2)--------------------ad1 ( ADSL 1 ) | My LAN(192.168.60.0/24) |---------eth0( 192.168.60.2)--> PC | |eth2 (10.0.2.2)---------------------ad2 (ADSL 2 ) All computer in LAN has default router =
2000 Jan 19
0
safe_strcpy is unsafe
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 08:27:05AM +1100, Michael Stockman wrote: > safe_strcpy is not very safe. It seems that it writes 1 char longer > than maxlen, which is bad if the buffer isn't that long. Example of > bad but common usage: > > pstring str; > safe_strcpy( str, "Hello world", sizeof(str) ); > > This may cause a SIGSEGV! Unfortunately safe_strcpy was
2007 Nov 14
2
lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy ERROR: string overflow by 1
Hi, I've seeing the following error messages recorded in logwatch against samba in two FC6 XA-64 systems with samba 3.0.24-7. lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(603) ERROR: string overflow by 1 (24 - 23) in safe_strcpy The main share in use on the first machine is via the guest account with Vista and XP clients, the other has more conventional shares with the Vista PC's as domain members
2007 Nov 30
0
ERROR: string overflow in safe_strcpy
Hello All, Our samba server rarely shows up follwing message in syslog. When this message appears, CPU average will be pretty high. winbindd[9585]: [2007/11/28 15:55:02, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(659) winbindd[9585]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (256 - 255) in safe_strcpy [01092-6821 winbindd[9585]: S-1-5] Hardware: Dell PowerEdge 2950 OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES4 Update 4
2003 Oct 20
1
"NULL dest in safe_strcpy"
I'm running Samba 3.0.0 and seeing a lot of Oct 20 10:02:25 littleboy smbd[2062]: [2003/10/20 10:02:25, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(577) Oct 20 10:02:25 littleboy smbd[2062]: ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy messages. Most things (except the problem I posted earlier) seem to work perfectly.
2003 Nov 17
1
printer permissions <-> ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy (samba 3.0.0)
Hi Jerry et al, I'm using SAMBA 3.0.0 on Solaris 9, it looks very cute, unfortunately I can not set the permissions on the printers (I can as an admin add a user etc. but all changes are lost after applying):-( Is this somehow related to the error entries in the log file: [2003/11/17 14:45:31, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(577) ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy If so will it be fixed in
2006 Feb 21
0
safe_strcpy problem in Samba 3.0.10
Hi! We have a lot of logfiles showing "zfl04.log.3: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (24 - 23) in safe_strcpy [organisation#rektorat#vrlehre#qe-eval]" I found a reported bug producing this output within older Samba versions than 3.0.4 . But we use version 3.0.10 and no mangling method set within smb.conf . Therefore it should be the defaultvalue hash2 which doesn't have this flaw.
2004 Sep 21
0
3.0.7; "string overflow by 1 (32 - 31) in safe_strcpy"
Hello, I'm using samba 3.0.4 (on RHL9) as a W2k3 domain member in an ADS realm. For printing I'm using CUPS of RHL9. The XP clients get the CUPS printers (CUPS redirects the printjob to the JetDirect card of the printer) and the appropriate PCL drivers installed via the "Point 'n Print" mechanism. The clients get their printers installed via de AD login script and the there
2004 Jan 23
1
Samba Print "ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy"
I'm new to SAMBA and to Linux. Am trying to replace windows file and print servers with RedHat9. I set up the server and installed Samba 3.0.0. I had everything running fine for two weeks(file and print sharing). Yesterday I must have tweaked something, because now I cannot print! I can connect to the printer via Network Neighborhood, but print jobs do not make it to the printer. I still
2004 Jul 14
4
String overflow in safe_strcpy .
Just Installed 3.0.5rc1 and the problem persists unfortunately, heres a sample of my log : wins[15212]: [2004/07/12 12:31:03, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600) Jul 12 12:31:03 mandrake1 nss_wins[15212]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (9 - 8) in safe_strcpy [TAENO~EI.PDF] Jul 12 12:31:03 mandrake1 nss_wins[15212]: [2004/07/12 12:31:03, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(600) Jul 12 12:31:03
2004 Jun 24
2
string overflow in safe_strcpy
I recently upgraded both of my samba servers (mirrors of each other) to 3.0.4, my log files now fill with the following messages (hundred lines per day): Jun 24 13:55:33 Clyde smbd[8597]: [2004/06/24 13:55:33, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(602) Jun 24 13:55:33 Clyde smbd[8597]: ERROR: string overflow by 1 (9 - 8) in safe_strcpy [LIBRA~V$.DOC] Jun 24 14:20:34 Clyde smbd[8597]: [2004/06/24
2007 Jul 04
1
Cannot seem to get printer driver delivery working from Vista 64 bit systems - Samba 3.0.25b
Version: Samba 3.0.25b OS: CentOS 5 x86_64 I've had printer driver delivery working OK to 32 bit clients for a while. I used cupsaddsmb to set that up originally. We recently added some 64 bit Vista client machines (yay). I created an x64 directory on the print$ share and followed the Samba HowTo instructions for finding and uploading a printer driver. The files are from a Vista 64 bit