similar to: Response too big for UDP, retry with TCP

Hello there I've got two samba servers srv1 and srv2 smb.conf for srv1: netbios aliases srv1-alias smb.conf for srv2: netbios aliases srv2-alias DNS is configured all right and resolves the names. Each name has got its own IP address. Both servers are AD members, run as expected and can be connected to via their netbios and netbios alias names. If, for example, srv1 fails I want to add

Hi My first post get no answer :=<, i post new with new elements. I have two Asterisk server, running on Asterisk 1.6: SRV1 = 192.168.0.5 on Asterisk 1.6.1.4 SRV2 = 192.168.0.20 on Asterisk 1.6.1.8 I want create a link for exchange call. on Srv1: iax.conf: [general] bindport=4569 bindaddr=0.0.0.0 language=fr bandwidth=low jitterbuffer=no forcejitterbuffer=no autokill=yes

Hi, I would like to share my experience with total server lock-up during CentOS5.1 installation using vnc installation method. My setup was as follows +--------------------------------------+ | my_PC, CentOS4.6 | | X, KDE, vncviewer | | 100Mbit/s eth0 | | Intel Corporation 82801BA/BAM/CA/CAM | +------eth0----------------------------+

Thanks Rowland. 2017-09-27 17:49 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 17:05:31 +0200 > Daniel Carrasco via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hello, thanks for your response. > > > > I'm using samba_internal as DNS because I don't want to add bind to > > only relay the internal DNS.

Hello, thanks for your response. I'm using samba_internal as DNS because I don't want to add bind to only relay the internal DNS. The hosts file is clean on srv2 DC (default localhost), and this is the srv1 hosts: 192.168.0.251 srv1.domain.com srv1 resolv.conf srv1: domain domain search domain.com nameserver 192.168.0.251 nameserver 8.8.8.8 resolv.conf srv2: nameserver

Hi! Having two hosts installed with libvirtd, kvm, qemu on (Ubuntu 10.10). Now I have one big problem and one less: I have set up kerberos for both hosts. Created the principal "libvirt/srv1.example.org at EXAMPLE.ORG" and "libvirt/srv2.example.org at EXAMPLE.ORG", Exported the krb5.keytab, Installed it and tested the servers: srv1.example.org: I can connect using kerberos

Hi, I am trying to establish TCP(s)-based replication between two FreeBSD 11.1 machines, both running Dovecot 2.2.35 (via pkg) with 10 virtual users and 1.2GB maildir. I followed the Wiki description (https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication), just skipped the SSH part. My resulting configurations are attached below. Problem: After reloading both Dovecot instances, a few seconds later they start to

This is driving me nuts... I have two LDAP servers working. One primary, one slave. Replication is working. I have my PDC authenticating against one LDAP server, or the other. I cannot get it to check the first, if that is unavailable, then check the second. It basically crashes. Here is the line I am currently using in smb.conf: ldap server = srv1.domain.com This works, as does:

I am building a Samba4 setup to replace a Samba3 server I built for small non profit school back in 2012. It is running CentOS 6.x, samba version 3.6.23-52.el6_10.? Rather than attempt to upgrade this system to Samba4, it makes more sense (to me at least) to build a new server and move the data. Currently I have 2 samba servers running as virtual machines under kvm.? One is the AD server,

Hi All, I am currently researching on doing high availability and load balancing with a couple of Linux servers, most specifically doing service takeover on top of Heartbeat. The scenario is: - 2 DSL lines from a single provider - 1 Broadband line from another provider Internet / | \ | | | /

Hello, I have a gluster volume set up using geo-replication on two slaves however I'm seeing inconsistent status output on the slave nodes. Here is the status shown by gluster volume geo-replication status on each node. [root at foo-gluster-srv3 ~]# gluster volume geo-replication status MASTER NODE MASTER VOL MASTER BRICK SLAVE USER SLAVE

Hi, We will put in production a DC and a file-server. DC will use samba-4 file-server will use samba4 too as a member server. DC will use internal DNS for AD domain And file-server will have a DNS server ("main dns server" for manage normal domain and slave domain. We have also 2 slave dns server for main DNS server. In schema :

Hi, I am trying to remove a brick, from a server which is no longer part of the gluster pool, but I keep running into errors for which I cannot find answers on google. [root at virt2 ~]# gluster peer status Number of Peers: 3 Hostname: srv1 Uuid: 2bed7e51-430f-49f5-afbc-06f8cec9baeb State: Peer in Cluster (Disconnected) Hostname: srv3 Uuid: 0e78793c-deca-4e3b-a36f-2333c8f91825 State: Peer in

Hi, FWIW this was also reported back in August[1] - experienced with 2.3.2.1 (not sure if earlier 2.3 releases were affected) and currently reproducible with latest 2.3.3 stable release. [1] https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2018-August/112548.html Cheers, Tony On 2018-10-12 04:26, Pascal wrote: > Hello, > > I use dovecot replication and the sieve scripts are not

I've rolled 2 virtual servers running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS and have installed the SerNet packages. SRV1 has the AD setup and SRV2 is a member server. I've followed the wiki for both servers to the letter, and winbind still refuses to grab info on the member server. I rolled the provision with --use-rfc2307, added a bunch of users with samba-tool. I then manually created a group and made sure

Hello all, When I try to add a user to my secrets.tdb file on my Samba 3.2.0 PDC, the users are always added under the local machine domain, not the global domain. That is, if my PDC machine name is srv1, and it is PDC for the domain DOM1, then whenever I add a user using "pdbedit -a -u username", then that user gets placed under the local domain SRV1, not the global domain DOM1. So my

I have the following system where I'm using Suse 7.1 on the servers: 172.22.2.0/24 172.22.3.0/24 172.22.4.0/24 Clients Clients Clients Internet Win95 Win95 Win95 | | | | +----------+ +----------+ +----------+ +----------+ | Srv1 | | Srv2

Hi, is it possible to share write locks amongst two samba servers? We are experiencing performance issues all the time, because one location (location A) is connected via VPN to the main location (location B) and needs to access files hosted there on some samba shares. Now loc A gets its own server, but still files hosted in B need to be read/write accessed from A and vice versa. It would be

Hello, I use dovecot replication and the sieve scripts are not replicated. Mail replication is working fine. Log when sieve script (with Rainloop webmail) is created: Oct 12 12:57:57 srv1 dovecot: managesieve-login: Login: user=<hativ at example.com>, method=PLAIN, rip=91.67.174.186, lip=195.201.251.57, mpid=5360, TLS, session=<OXvK9QV4fOBbQ666> Oct 12 12:57:57 srv1 dovecot:

I am setting up a linux system in my school, where I have designed the following system: 172.22.2.0/24 172.22.3.0/24 172.22.4.0/24 Clients Clients Clients Internet Win95 Win95 Win95 | | | | +----------+ +----------+ +----------+ +----------+ | Srv1