similar to: create mask vs security mask

open("/usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd", O_WRONLY|O_APPEND|O_CREAT|O_LARGEFILE, 0666) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) umask(0) = 022 brk(0x81e6000) = 0x81e6000 stat64("", 0xbfffed80) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) umask(022) = 0 That "No such file or directory"

I can join a domain, but wbinfo -t does not work. I used Mandrake's .src.rpm. I tried the same .src.rpm on a x86 machine and it works. strace's are attached. Any ideas? ...Jeff -------------- next part -------------- execve("/usr/bin/wbinfo", ["wbinfo", "-t"], [/* 38 vars */]) = 0 uname({sys="Linux", node="balsa", ...}) = 0

Hello, I have noticed that the -u parameter to the sftp-server or internal-sftp subsystem is not working correctly. For openssh-5.6p1 I believe that the problem lies in this code, starting at line 1414 in sftp-server.c: ---------------------------------------------------------- case 'u': mask = (mode_t)strtonum(optarg, 0, 0777, &errmsg); if (errmsg != NULL)

Hello. I have set up a new samba server here at work, and for most things it is working great -- but there is yet one major issue. It works fine for Windows and Dave clients, but the problem arises when I use smbmount. It is set up as a domain member of an ADS domain. For example, I have a public share that everyone in the office should be able to access, regardless of platform or even

Hello, I'm facing a rights issue on with Asterisk 11.3.0 running on CentOS release 5.8. Asterisk process is running with asterisk since it is define in asterisk.conf as following: runuser = asterisk rungroup = asterisk You can see asterisk proccess here: ps aux |egrep 'python|asterisk' root 11581 0.0 0.1 65940 600 ? S Apr17 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk

If the rsyncd.conf has a line such as: log file = /var/log/rsync/log and /var/log/rsync doesn't exist or isn't a directory (or the log file can't be opened for any other reason), then there's no warning whatsoever, as rsync forks itself into the background before checking the config, opening the log file, etc. Worse still, it gets a SIGSEGV, and dumps core. Here's a strace

Hello Sorry for disturbing again. It looks like I must pass lot of compilation issues to force pam_smbpass working. And I don't believe, that nobody faced same problems as I do, because I am using quite trivial configuration without success, so maybes somebody can share experience with pam_smbpass under Solaris or help me identify what's wrong with it ? So finally I wrote my own pam

Hey folks-- When ssh creates a known_hosts file for a user, it disregards the currently-set umask, and can actually turn on mode bits that the user has explicitly masked. While i'm happy to have ssh make files *more* secure than my umask (in situations where that's reasonable, like the creation of new ssh keys, etc), i'm not sure that i see the point in ssh making the files more open

Hi all, It looks like Dovecot 1.0rc7 reports the wrong content-type for messages with only a text/html body. An example of such a message is: --- From: mathijs at izecom.com Subject: test To: foobar at example.com Content-Type: text/html; test --- When I talk IMAP to Dovecot directly using telnet and fetch the bodystructure of this message, Dovecot replies: * 1 FETCH (BODYSTRUCTURE

Hi, I've already discussed this issue in SSHSCI's SSH 2.2 context on ssh at clinet.fi list. My standpoint is that it's wrong and meaningless to perform chown in sftp-server as the file is most likely copied between systems with distinct accounting system where user is not necessarily (and even unlikely) has same numeric user id. The original bug report was that user couldn't

So any files that are uploaded through my form are getting the following mode: -rw------- I need them to have: -rw-r--r-- I''ve tried setting the umask in a script file called set_umask.rb as follows: File.umask(022) and then starting mongrel using: mongrel_rails start -m config/mime.types -S set_umask.rb but it doesn''t seem to change the mode that the files are created

> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest that >> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make >> a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the

Hi there, I have a problem when I try to create a new user with swat. I use binaries of Samba 2.2.2 coming from www.samba.org, or from www.sunfreeware.com on Solaris 2.6 and on 8. I compiled the sources and the result is the same. When I click on "Add New User" (Server Password Management), I receive a nearly blank page: I can only see the samba gif on top and the user is not

Hello. I've tried to implement dovecot's deliver LDA to my home mailserver. I've run into troubles :) dovecot-deliver.conf: -- snip -- mail = maildir:%h/Maildir:INBOX=maildir:%h/Maildir mbox_read_locks = flock mbox_write_locks = flock -- snip -- when i run: deliver -d bfg < email.txt dovecot delivers message to ~/Maildir/maildir/new It acctually creates "maildir"

> On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >>>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >>>> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest >>>> that >>>> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but

I'm running OpenSSH 5.1p1 on openSUSE 10.3 (i586) and I want to setup chroot jails for certain SFTP-only users. I use the following lines in my sshd_config file: Match Group sftponly ChrootDirectory /home/chroot-%u ForceCommand internal-sftp It works great. The problem is that some of my users need umask 002 for their uploads. I tried a few ways to achieve this: * set umask in sshrc,

On 7/21/20 9:59 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>>> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >>>>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >>>>> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest >>>>> that

On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've >>> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest that >>> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make

We have a problem whereby Nautilus is not using the umask setting defined by the user (e.g. when creating directories via the the 'Places' menu). The umask used by Nautilus is 022, but the shell umask (in our case) is set to 002 A quick search seems to suggest that this a common problem, and various methods are suggested to 'fix' this - the only way that appears to work on

On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: > I need to set the umask for apache to 002.? I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.? Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference.? Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script for systemd.? And that