similar to: [Fwd: Help with permissions]

Hi Folks. I'm trying to setup Samba and having a bit of a problem... However, I'm not sure if it's a Samba issue, or NFS issue. The setup is as follows: Server 1 --> exports /storage/ftpusers In that folder, there are numerous user folders that are owned by each specific user. Server 2 --> nfs mounts server1:/storage/ftpusers as /mnt/ftpusers At the

Hi folks, After some more trial and error, I was able to get a bit further in the game with the permission issues I had (previous message was titled 'Samba permissions...) Now I'm able to get onto the system, browse and read/copy/delete files off of the shares. What I can't do is put stuff on because I get a locking error. The setup is as follows: Server 1 -->

Nope, it doesn't add it to the kernel boot parameters. That was the first thing I checked. As for the bootproto ... DUH. I didn't check that. :) That being solved, yeah it's not bringing up the add-in card now when it boots up. On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Jason Warr <jason at warr.net> wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:42:57 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner

On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:42:57 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner <ashley at pcraft.com> wrote: > And after picking this back up this morning .... still no dice. I have > now > blacklisted the one module that would enumerate the add-in ethernet port > so > that is no longer an issue during the kickstart process, however the > following is now happening: > > - kickstart

Scenario: Internet | | | (subnet 1.2.3.4) Router (subnet 5.6.7.8) / \ / \ Public WWW server Firewall Server |

On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:45:04 -0600, Ashley M. Kirchner <ashley at pcraft.com> wrote: > Out of order meaning, it puts the additional ethernet card as eth0, with > the built-in ports as eth1 and eth2 respectively. WITHOUT the additional > card >installed, it puts the built-in ports as eth0 and eth1, which is > what I want it to do. The additional card should be eth2, at

another identical machine will have the same bus ids. that's why this works. Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289 Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382 DealMax Pty Ltd GitHub: @tartansandal Suite 1416 401 Docklands Drive Docklands VIC 3008 Australia "All parts should go together without forcing. You must

Hi Ashley, yes, try the newhidups driver. It should work. If there are problems, we can improve the driver. -- Peter P.S. please keep the mailing list cc'd. Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: > > Eric S. Johansson wrote: > > >> The software that Belkin includes is the "Bulldog" software. They do > >> offer a Linux version, but it is not included on the CD that

And after picking this back up this morning .... still no dice. I have now blacklisted the one module that would enumerate the add-in ethernet port so that is no longer an issue during the kickstart process, however the following is now happening: - kickstart completes successfully using the machine's physical port 2 (or eth1) which is on a subnet with DHCP - when the system reboots, it

Hi Ashley, I don't think I have an answer for you, but I had a similar experience. We had a 2000 server set up that was sharing files to macs. I decided to rsync back it up to a more normal environment(*nix). I had all kinds of problems. I tried mounting the share via smb as you are trying. I tried cygwin/rsync on the 2000 machine, still had problems, though I think they were fewer,

Out of order meaning, it puts the additional ethernet card as eth0, with the built-in ports as eth1 and eth2 respectively. WITHOUT the additional card installed, it puts the built-in ports as eth0 and eth1, which is what I want it to do. The additional card should be eth2, at least that's what I want it to do. Looking at persistent-net.rules, it always puts the additional card first, both

I just installed CentOS 4 on a new server and now I'm looking for updates that have been released. I like to keep a local mirror of all the updates so I can apply them to other machines easier/faster (this of course assuming I end up installing CentOS on more servers.) So, where are those updates mirrored? With RH/FC, I can hit any mirror and rsync the updates folders. Is there an

Hello folks, I'm about to install Centos on a new server and this will be my first "exposure" if you will to Centos. I come from an RH/Fedora background. Anyway, is there a list somewhere that will tell me what UPS batteries are compatible with Centos 4 (brand/model)? I figured before I go out and buy something I better check to see what's supported. Thanks.

Hi folks, I have a production server that's currently running 5.0 with all updates. What's the easiest, or perhaps best way to upgrade it to 5.1, with minimal down time? The downtime is critical, so I need to have it be a short as possible. I can live with an hour or two, but larger is going to be a pain. Suggestions? -- W | It's not a bug - it's an undocumented

Dear Ashley, I have no personal experience with the Tower-Rack series, but someone reported on the Nut-upsuser mailing list on 29 Nov 2005 that these models work with the "belkin" driver of the NUT software (http://www.networkupstools.org/). This is for the serial port. For USB, the NUT "newhidups" driver should work (or if it does not, we can fix it). The software that

I installed CentOS 5 on a server today (wiping clean the drive which had 4.4 on it). During installation I picked the correct timezone, location and all. Yet, upon booting the machine, it seems to think that it's 6 hours earlier than it really is. The BIOS has the correct time and date on it. /etc/locatime was originally what /usr/share/zoneinfo/America/Denver would've

Anyone know where I can get a 'netmask' rpm for CentOS? I have it on my Fedora systems (it's in extras) but can't find it in CentOS' extras. Ideas? -- W | It's not a bug - it's an undocumented feature. +-------------------------------------------------------------------- Ashley M. Kirchner <mailto:ashley at pcraft.com> . 303.442.6410 x130 IT

So a 70-persistent-net.rules like # onboard port 1 -> eth0 ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", BUS=="pci", ID=="0000:00:19.0", NAME="eth0" # PCIe card -> eth2 ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", BUS=="pci", ID=="0000:03:00.0", NAME="eth2" # onboard port 2 -> eth1 ACTION=="add",

Ok, when I run that, it creates a now "custom" 70-persistent-net.rules, but the interfaces are still out of order, with the added one listed first, and the built-ins 2nd and 3rd. On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Jason Warr <jason at warr.net> wrote: > Here is my script for post install if you want to try it. > > In order for the shuffling to not occur you do need to

Care to explain those two. direct versus indirect mapping? On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Ashley M. Kirchner <ashley at pcraft.com> > wrote: > > Nope, that completely takes over '/mnt' and everything else that's in > there > > becomes invisible. However, I do believe