similar to: altered ACLs do not apply on existing subdirectories

we're using samba 3.0.11 (updated from 2.2.19) after the update, the windows 98 machines all showing only the short filenames on the server. (on other servers there are long filenames still available). can anybody give me an idea? thx in advance kurt smb.conf: ====================================================================== [global] # 2005-01-05 einbau wixp # vfs object =

sorry if i repost this question, but it's urgent. has somebody an idea? if i broke any rules with this mail, please tell me, what's wrong with it. thx in adv, gk -------- Urspr?ngliche Nachricht -------- Betreff: [Samba] problems with win98 and samba 3 Datum: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:24:29 +0200 Von: kurt weiss <maillists@kwnet.at> An: 'samba@lists.samba.org'

The setup: - Samba 2.2.6 with winbind on Solaris 9. - PDC on NT 4.0 SP6 - fresh install in test lab Solaris host correctly authenticates users. wbinfo -u returns all users wbinfo -g returns all groups getent passwd returns all users getent group returns all groups except Domain Users! wbinfo -n 'Domain Users' returns <SID-of-Domain-Users> wbinfo -G 10000 returns

Thank you! Does it possible to convert this git diffs - https://attachments.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=11162 to common patch? I would like to apply it to Sernet packages sources and rebuild it for test. On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 6:05 PM, mourik jan heupink <heupink at merit.unu.edu> wrote: > Perhaps this: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11061 > > > On

Hello all! We have Windows-base AD with 2012R2 level. I would like to provide authentication and GPO in our new remote branch office. Basically, there are two ways: 1. Samba-only domain + trust relationship main AD. 2. Remote Samba DC as members of existing AD maintainig same set of users. FAQ says that 'trust' is useless due to group membership restrictions. But what about second

Here you go, Ian...... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: G3RIR <g3rir@yahoo.com> Date: 05-Apr-2006 20:54 Subject: [dmuars] Eh up - March 144 results altered To: dmuars@yahoogroups.com What's going on here. The results of the MArch 144 UKAC have been re-published and we have lost out considerably. Either I don't understand the rules or we have been robbed We scored

Hi, I did an centos update from 7.4 to 7.5 and the krb5 package altered the existing and used config file! That should be a no go from my pov, as in my setup it broke some services which had a problem with the includedir line which was added. Shouldn*t there be a rpmnew config file be created instead with the new/optional/added settings? Regards . G?tz

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 3:54 PM G?tz Reinicke <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > I did an centos update from 7.4 to 7.5 and the krb5 package altered the existing and used config file! That should be a no go from my pov, as in my setup it broke some services which had a problem with the includedir line which was added. Which config file?

> Am 13.06.2018 um 17:55 schrieb Richard Grainger <grainger at gmail.com>: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 3:54 PM G?tz Reinicke > <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I did an centos update from 7.4 to 7.5 and the krb5 package altered the existing and used config file! That should be a no go from my pov, as in my setup it broke

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 6:56 PM G?tz Reinicke <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de> wrote: > /etc/krb5.conf > I looked at the spec file in the source RPM for the krb5-libs package and it it has the correct %config(noreplace) directive next to that file in the %files section, so this is mysterious.

On 06/14/2018 09:30 AM, me at tdiehl.org wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Richard Grainger wrote: > >> I looked at the spec file in the source RPM for the krb5-libs package >> and it it has the correct %config(noreplace) directive next to that >> file in the %files section, so this is mysterious. > > I too can confirm this behavior. # rpm -qa krb\* --triggers triggerun

On Mon, 18 Jun 2018, G?tz Reinicke wrote: > > >> Am 15.06.2018 um 01:04 schrieb Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>: >> >> On 06/14/2018 09:30 AM, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >>> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Richard Grainger wrote: >>> >>>> I looked at the spec file in the source RPM for the krb5-libs package >>>> and it it has

By mistake or by design membership in a Windows Primary Group seems to be mandatory! We are using printservers configured as member servers of Samba domains. with the following configuration security = DOMAIN password server = PDC encrypt passwords = yes map to guest = Bad Password The Samba PDCs use plain smbpasswd files. Since upgrading to 3.0.25 and

On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Richard Grainger wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 6:56 PM G?tz Reinicke > <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de> wrote: > >> /etc/krb5.conf >> > I looked at the spec file in the source RPM for the krb5-libs package > and it it has the correct %config(noreplace) directive next to that > file in the %files section, so this is mysterious. I too

From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> elf_rel_set_symbol() fails if the symbol is in the .bss section. Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> --- purgatory/arch/i386/console-x86.c | 6 +++--- purgatory/arch/i386/crashdump_backup.c | 8 +++++--- purgatory/arch/x86_64/purgatory-x86_64.c | 6 +++--- purgatory/include/purgatory.h | 4

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:34:12PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > In the next patch, we want to get rid of the requirement for the user > to supply LD_LIBRARY_PATH pointing to vddk libs, if we can derive it > ourselves from libdir. However, VDDK itself requires LD_LIBRARY_PATH > to be set (because it tries to load libraries that in turn depend on a > bare library name, which no manner

Hi Step 1: I create a data.frame called iolm. Step 2: I create a conditional subset i_wtr. Step 3: In this subset I add 0.3 to all values in the IOLM_AST column. Step 4: Now I am looking for the best way to Œmerge¹ the altered subset back into the original iolm data.frame ## STEP 1 >iolm ID IOLM_AST IOLM_AXIS 1 1 1.15 165.33 2 2 1.20 79.00 3 3 0.40

Hi, Today I downloaded and compiled the last R-devel snapshot. The SVN-REVISION in the tarball contains the following: Revision: 36792 Last Changed Date: 2005-12-18 But after compiling on Unix (I compiled out of tree), I ended up with an SVN-REVSION file containing: Revision: unknown Last Changed Date: Today in the build tree. Then when I start R, I get: R : Copyright Today, The

> Am 15.06.2018 um 01:04 schrieb Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>: > > On 06/14/2018 09:30 AM, me at tdiehl.org wrote: >> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Richard Grainger wrote: >> >>> I looked at the spec file in the source RPM for the krb5-libs package >>> and it it has the correct %config(noreplace) directive next to that >>> file in the

Squid, a proxy, is by its nature, storing large amounts of relatively small files in it's cache. As config optins it's offering: # 'Level-1' is the number of first-level subdirectories which # will be created under the 'Directory'. The default is 16. # # 'Level-2' is the number of second-level subdirectories which # will be created under