similar to: Samba priting problem, might be windows printer defintion

Dear R helpers I am having recovery rates as given below and I am trying to estimate the Loss Given Default (LGD) and for this I am using Kernel Density estimation method. recovery_rates = c(0.61,0.12,0.10,0.68,0.87,0.19,0.84,0.81,0.87,0.54,0.08,0.65,0.91, 0.56,0.52,0.30,0.41,0.24,0.66,0.35,0.36,0.64,0.55,0.43,0.36,0.28,0.89,0.11,0.23,0.07,

Hi, I have a virtual user defined in class users Class A inherits users and uses override to add another group to the user with User[''user''} {group +> ''group''} class B inherits users and does the same for another group. in rare cases, class A and class B are on the same machine. I know that if class B inherits class A which inherits users works, but I

From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> Fix the definition of struct statfs64, required for run-init to work on alpha. verified to have no regressions on amd64. Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <janitor@sternwelten.at> Signed-off-by: Frederik Sch?ler <fschueler-guest@costa.debian.org> --- klibc-1.1.1.orig/include/sys/vfs.h +++ klibc-1.1.1/include/sys/vfs.h @@ -32,17 +32,17

You can compile an empty C source code with clang -S -emit-llvm and copy the data layout from there. 2011/10/27 Seb <babslachem at gmail.com> > Hi all, > > Can someone give me advice on what should be a good definition of target > datalayout for an ARM cortex-A9 + neon target and x86 32-bit ? > Shall I use a different definition for a cortex-A9 without neon ? > Thanks for

I don't really know exactly why you're getting this, but it seems like you forgot the last line in your Builtins<Target>.def. Namely, the line: #undef BUILTIN On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:29 AM, Rail Shafigulin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I've introduced intrinsics for my target however when I compile llvm+clang > I get a a redefinition warning:

Hi all, Can someone give me advice on what should be a good definition of target datalayout for an ARM cortex-A9 + neon target and x86 32-bit ? Shall I use a different definition for a cortex-A9 without neon ? Thanks for your advices Best Regards Seb -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I tried bu clang seems to support only target on which it has been compiled. If I use: with clang -S -emit-llvm t.c -o t.ll I've got following file for t.ll ; ModuleID = 't.c' target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple =

I've introduced intrinsics for my target however when I compile llvm+clang I get a a redefinition warning: llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic/Targets.cpp:904:0: warning: "BUILTIN" redefined [enabled by default] #define BUILTIN(ID, TYPE, ATTRS) { #ID, TYPE, ATTRS, 0, ALL_LANGUAGES }, ^ In file included from llvm/tools/clang/lib/Basic/Targets.cpp:26:0:

We use rsync in a Linux installation script. First, the root filesystem of another machine on the network is cloned with "rsync -axzH", and then a few files are updated to give the clone its own identity. This works fine, but last week, the Postfix mailer daemon on a new machine refused to start because some lock files had a link count of 2. It turned out that rsync had created two

Dear R-help-list, I started using R coming from the former use of SPSS, mainly writing my own syntax. I do classical experimental cognitive psychology and am interested in the cognitive control of task sequences (i.e. classification task). Especially I am interested in the performance of the actual depending on the tasks before. Thus, in SPSS I create variables like this one: Compute cond =

Hm. I may misunderstand, but I'm not sure that's an improvement over the problem you're trying to solve. How about something like this? (Please forgive any accent; I don't speak snake fluently.) class Pet(object): @staticmethod def new(): # Create a 'free' pet. It can later become owned, but not to more than one owner. return

gledaj online filmove potpuno besplatno... http://pet.prevodim.com/interspire/link.php?M=181705&N=11&L=8&F=T ** ?ta je potrebno za gledanje filmova preko interneta (http://pet.prevodim.com/interspire/link.php?M=181705&N=11&L=8&F=T) ------------------------------------------------------------ Da biste gledali filmi?e preko weba trebate imati dobar internet

Hola: Si codificas "col1" como un factor, lo puedes cambiar todo de una vez renombrando los niveles correspondientes: > df$col1<-as.factor(df$col1) > df$col1  [1] uno   dos   3     4     cinco 6     siete 8     9     diez Levels: 3 4 6 8 9 cinco diez dos siete uno > levels(df$col1)[1:5] <-

Hello! I am merging two datasets and I have encountered a problem with sort. Can someone please point me to my error. Here is the example. ## I have dataframes, first one with factor and second one with factor ## and integer > tmp1 <- data.frame(col1 = factor(c("A", "A", "C", "C", "0", "0"))) > tmp2 <- data.frame(col1 =

Patrick, ## Run the following script an notice the different values of the dataframe "data" in each instance. # I understand you have done something like the following: data <- data.frame(COL1 = c("6/1/14", "7/1/14"), COL2 = c("5/1/15", "5/1/15"), stringsAsFactors = FALSE) data$Date_Flag <- ifelse(data$COL2 >

Hello guys: I'm running two Zentyal servers with Samba 4.1.17 on each one. We're experiencing some problems such as: - When a user changes his password, it is not replicated the change on secondary DC. - Some Windows machines have reported trust relationship broken. On DC1 I run this: params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/shares.conf" ldb_wrap open

Dear all, I have a dataframe which looks like this (dummy): date<-c("jan", "feb", "mar", "apr", "may", "june", "july", "aug","sep","oct","nov","dec") col1<-c(8.2,5.4,4.3,4.1,3.1,2.5,1.1,4.5,3.2,1.9,7.8,6.5) col2<-c(3.1,2.3,4.7,6.9,7.5,1.1,3.6,8.5,7.5,2.5,4.1,2.3)

Is there a way to set the base class to abstract? or otherwise enforce that no one can create a "Pet"? Pet < ActiveRecord Dog < Pet Pig < Pet I''ve tried: class Pet < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :type end but I get an error about ../vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/validations.rb:74: warning: Object#type is deprecated; use Object#class

On May 13, 2008, at 07:31, Mahadevan R wrote: > Um. Unfortunately in this case, Python will not collect an instance > of Pet which owned by an Owner, because both objects in the > reference cycle have finalizers (__del__). Python will just add both > objects to a garbage list (and will not call any of the finalizers). Actually, there's no reference cycle, which is what I

Dear very helpful friends, It is Sunday, there is no air traffic in Europe, what better to do than try and learn me some more R. I have the following example: owner <- c(1:4) animal <- c("cat", "dog", "cat", "dog") char.1 <- c("fluffy", "playful", "mean", "stupid") food <- c("cat food",