similar to: unix network printing

I have a vague recollection of seeing reference, fairly recently, to a function that forms a single factor which ``codes'' the interaction between two (or more?) factors. Do I recollect correctly? It would be easy enough to roll one's own, but if there is an existing function it probably does a much cleverer job than I would do. cheers, Rolf Turner rolf at math.unb.ca

Dear All, I remenber that with R1.6.2 I was able to install from CRAN this package. But is OK the solution gave by Dr. Ripley. Thanks to everybody Cheers Antonio ----- Mensaje Original ----- Remitente: Robert Gentleman <rgentlem at jimmy.harvard.edu> Fecha: Viernes, Mayo 16, 2003 2:36 pm Asunto: Re: [R] unable to install dse package > Hi Antonio, > There is a bug in the

On Thu, November 2, 2017 11:18 am, hw wrote: > m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> hw wrote: >>> Richard Zimmerman wrote: >>>> DO NOT buy the newer HPE DL20 gen9 or ML10 gen9 servers then >>>> (especially >>>> if using CentOS 6.x) >>> >>> What would you suggest as alternative, something from Dell? >> >> Yep, Dell's

after upgrade to 2.x, sieve do not create folder, which do not exist. i remenber(maybe wrong) 1.2.x sieve plugin will create folder, if it do not exist. the sieve log like this failed to store into mailbox 'dovecot': Mailbox doesn't exist: dovecot can i config sieve automatic create the folder? please help, and thank you.

Hi, I'm finding a very strange error. For no good reason my R console (Rgui.exe, R 2.5.0, under win XP) stops producing anything meaningful, and just returns: Error: bad value to _whatever_ I enter. It starts doing this after a while, not immediately when launched. I have to restart R when this happens. No idea why. I didn't change anything in the R config that I remenber. Any

> On Nov 11, 2020, at 5:38 PM, Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com> wrote: > > On Nov 11, 2020, at 2:01 PM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: >> >> I have yet to see software RAID that doesn't kill the performance. > > When was the last time you tried it? > > Why would you expect that a modern 8-core Intel CPU would impede I/O in any measureable way as

I recollect that there used to be a fixed, finite limit to the number of call groups that could exist. Does anyone know if that limitation still exists in 1.2.1, or maybe where I could look in the code to find out if it's a fixed length array or not? Thanks. Doug.

> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:36:47PM -0700, Steve Edwards wrote: >> I want to capture all SIP messages. >> >> I have about 30 hosts in about 6 colos. >> >> My first thought was dumpcap, but the output file name format bugs me. >> >> What do you use for long term SIP capture? On Wed, 31 May 2017, Daniel Tryba wrote: > What bugs you about the output

Hi, I'm curious what chip Digium is using in the latest TDM400 cards. Specifically, to my recollection, they used to use the TigerJet 320G, however somewhat recently, Tigerjet was bought out, and now the 320G is no longer produced. Maybe a better question is: is there a way I can take the latest DAHDI source and get a list of supported chipsets from it? Thanks. MCH -------------- next part

Ron Blok wrote: > Could it be a file/directory permission issue ? I have a vague recollection that the file needs to be able to be opened for writing as well as reading, if that helps. Geoff.

Hi, I have ported LLC to a risc cpu. It can pass benchmark that I have at current. But I want do some optimization after register alloction by adjusting register using. I scan MachineBasicBlock to analyze operand's IsKill, IsDead , IsDef attribute to get a physical register's liverange. But I get a strange case at MBB.jpg. R4 is marked <kill> at MBB0. If I scan R4's

On 01/18/2015 03:23 PM, Sebastian Herbszt wrote: > > --- tftp-hpa-5.2/tftpd/tftpd.c.orig 2015-01-16 21:45:30.790798281 +0100 > +++ tftp-hpa-5.2/tftpd/tftpd.c 2015-01-18 23:44:28.031177383 +0100 > @@ -1504,6 +1504,8 @@ static int validate_access(char *filenam > return ENOSPACE; > case EEXIST: > return EEXISTS; > + case EACCES: >

On Jan 14, 2010, at 6:39 PM, 任坤 wrote: > But I want do some optimization after register alloction by adjusting > register using. I scan MachineBasicBlock to analyze operand's IsKill, IsDead , IsDef attribute to get a physical register's liverange. But I get a strange case at MBB.jpg. You can also look at RegisterScavenging.cpp and MachineVerifier.cpp. They are doing the same

On 01/20/2015 12:17 PM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > On 01/20/2015 09:13 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> I can't remember, but I have a vague recollection that someone >> specifically requested that EACCES be treated the same as ENOENT... > > If that is really necessary then please don't report that condition as > "file not found"; it's really

Hi all, I am currently building an application based on R 1.7.1 (+ compiled C/C++ code + MySql + VB). I am building this application to work on 2 different platforms (Windows XP Professional (500mb memory) and Windows NT 4.0 with service pack 6 (1gb memory)). This is a very memory intensive application performing sophisticated operations on "large" matrices (typically 5000x1500

Michael Smith wrote: > On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:10:50 +1000, Geoff Shang <geoff@hitsandpieces.net> wrote: > >>Ron Blok wrote: >> >> >>>Could it be a file/directory permission issue ? >> >>I have a vague recollection that the file needs to be able to be opened for >>writing as well as reading, if that helps. > > > Your recollection

I am having difficulties with customer-bound DTMF being very short & clipped off (and basically unusable, as systems on the customer side aren't recognizing the DTMF digits, and I can barely tell that DTMF is there when I listen on a handset). My system set up as follows: PSTN <--> Metaswitch <-SIP-> Asterisk <-SIP or IAX2-> CPE Asterisk is running Asterisk 10.4.0 on a

I've recently changed to Centos 7. My recollection from C6 is that a couple useful repositories need yum priorities to prevent some mixups. I do not remember what they are. My C6 is gone. Google has not told me what C6 repositories were. In the near future, I will be installing nux and epel. My understanding is that they do play well with each other and with base. Are there common useful C7

I think most function redirection patching schemes are going to be mutually incompatible, so I'm not sure it makes sense to make this attribute a comma-separated list. I think Eric's and Dean's use case may be better addressed by a separate attribute. My recollection is that they want to add nop slides to the prologue and epilogue that can be hotpatched to enable and disable

Hi, I installed RH 7.1/e2fsprogs 1.22 and util-linux 2.11f on a box with a 3ware 6200 and 2 20GB IDE drives and then installed 2.4.7 and ext3 0.9.5 I unmounted all the filesystems except / and did a tune2fs -i 0 -c 0 -j <device> on all the remaining filesystems This created a journal with a hidden file. >From what I recollect, doing a tune2fs on a mounted fs creates .journal file. I