similar to: Microsoft programs overwrite default mask

On btrfs, do the following ------------------ # su user1 # cd btrfs-part/ # touch aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rw- group::rw- other::r-- # su user2 # cd btrfs-part/ # setfacl -m u::rwx aaa # getfacl aaa # file: aaa # owner: user1 # group: user1 user::rwx <- successed to setfacl group::rw- other::r-- ------------------ but we

Hi, I have a share (testshare) where different unix groups (testgroup1, testgroup2) should have access to. But I want that new files are only created with 660 permissions. Here are the ACL's of testshare: # file: testshare # owner: ralfgro # group: ve user::rwx group::rwx group:testgroup1:rwx group:testgroup2:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::---

Thank you, Rowland, for the reply. On 02/06/2017 10:44, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:07:18 +0200 > Alnis Morics via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I continue setting up my FreeBSD 11.0 machine with Samba 4.4.9 built >> from sources. (Actually, OS type and Samba version don't matter so >> much, as I

On 02/06/2017 11:48, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 11:11:09 +0200 > Alnis Morics via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Thank you, Rowland, for the reply. >> > >> And the nss tests as per Wiki seem to pass: >> > >> >> # getent passwd Administrator >>

We are having what appears to be two main issues in our attempt to setup Samba 3.0.0 compiled from src on Solaris 8. We are using Samba to provide Unix shares on W2K clients, and to authenticate against a W2K Active Directory server. OpenLDAP is used on the Samba side for the UID/GID to SID mappings. The first issue deals with the file sharing. Even if a file gives full permission to one of a

I have a great understanding problem about acls and share-definitions. I use Samba 3.0.1pre3, compiled with acl-support, everything works fine, ACL's can be set with Windows XP File-Manager and the getfacl shows that it is OK. My Problem ist that I dont know how to define a share for acls. For example, here is my share [user1] Path=/lanman/user1 Valid users=user1,@root Force user=user1 Read

Hi Guys! A simple question.. I never worked with ACL's and since my costumer want some access levels for some sub-foldes in shares, I am reading some manuals about that.. But.. Before apply some testings, I need some advices about this.. Here is my question... Parent folder (share): FOLDER Sub-folder1: PROJETC1 Sub-folder2: PROJECT2 User1: DIRECTOR Group: Director/Projects User2: Employee1

Hello, I have noticed some ALC issues with files and directories. I use samba server 3.0.33 on CentOS 4.8 joined to Windows 2003 domain. Everything works fine, all users are authenticated to domain controller. My aim is to give FULL ACCESS (open/read/write/rename/delete..) to directory "testdir" to two users, john and mark without using groups because I have no permissions on domain

Hi All. Greetings from South Africa. I have a Samba LDAP server (v 3.022) running on Ubuntu 6.10 Its serving about 200 users, with profiles, and domain logons. I want to start server MS Access Databases on it, with the best speed performance as possible. At the moment, the back ends for these databases, are about 200+ MB, and will grow over the next few years. Basically, the share should

Wonder if someone can point me in the right direction here - just built some new bricks running gluster 3.4 alpha 3 (from http://download.gluster.org) with the objective of testing them to replace some existing 3.2 systems in production. The main thing I was after was NFS ACL support, however on getting everything setup, I still don't seem to be able to see POSIX extended ACLs on the

I have an issue with samba+acl and Windows checkbox "Replace all Child object permissions" . I have a folder with defaults ACLs : /default:user:user1:rwx, default:user:user2:rwx owned by user1/ On Windows if I'm checking "Replace all Child object permissions with inheritable permissions from this object" on this folder, it losts the default ACL

I have a samba share (using Samba 3.6.3) running on an ext4 filesystem with the "acl" mount option. The samba share is configured as follows: [myshare] path = /srv/myshare browseable = no public = no guest ok = no writable = yes printable = no create mode = 0660 directory mode = 0770 level2 oplocks = no oplocks = no I have configured the following ACLs on

Dear All. I have a file server. I installed the samba on it to store the document. See below for the security : - group : + g1 : user1, user2,user3 + g2 : user4, user5,user6 + g3 : user1,user5 - folder : + folder A : set permission chmod 775 and group chown root:g3 The problem is when the user1 modified a file in folder A then that file add the group g1 automatically. So

woudln't work because all the users are in one group anyway. and i am not allowed to to give read rights do "any" (i.e. 755) but theres really no option in smb.conf like "read only users = " or something like that? Am 13.12.2011 17:56, schrieb Raffael Sahli: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:38:41 +0100, "skull"<skull17 at gmx.ch> wrote: >> I want to

On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 14:18:53 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jan 2018 14:10:40 +0100 > Micha Ballmann <ballmann at uni-landau.de> wrote: > > > To set share windows permissions and windows acl i login on a > > windows 7 computer with the administrator user.|Open ||Computer > > Management and connect to the

I'm having trouble with files being marked read-only in Windows because the Solaris file owner does not have write-permissions on the file; group-write is allowed: -r--rw---- 1 user group 32 Feb 13 14:19 testfile.txt I thought that setting "store dos attributes = yes" for this share would allow the "read only" setting to be stored in extended attributes, but it

I want to make a subfolder read only for certain users. for example: /data/pool is public rwx for all users. and now i would like to make a /data/pool/subfolder only rwx for user1 and grant read only permissions to user2 and user3 how do i do this? any links or direct tips on that? my suggestion would be something like this, but as you can imagine it didn't work: # The general datapool

Hello, I'm using samba 3.0.2(acl) and kernel 2.4.24+acl, libacl-2.2.23. Following problem: When I create a file in an directory with extended ACLs, samba applies the "create mask" in a wrong way (IMHO). The normal behaviour of tools like chmod is that the second (middle) permission field is mapped to the "mask" ACE if the file has an extended ACL, so that the change

On 19/12/14 01:33, Rich Webb wrote: > Please is there anyone who has an answer on why this might be happening? > Do I need some sort of sssd support or winbind or something? In the > wiki about setting up acl's it doesn't say anything about any other > requirements, only that you have to have acl support and xattr support > in your filesystem which I do. > > I'm

My File Server is a Unix Domain Member. And yes i ve done all this settings. First i got this Error: Enter SAMDOM\administrator's password: Could not connect to server 127.0.0.1 The username or password was not correct. Connection failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE But the troubleshooting guide (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_Member_Server_Troubleshooting) helped me to fix this