similar to: Re: 3.0.23d UNIX vs. AD group permissions

We have what may be a very, very bad situation here and I'm hoping someone may be able to point out either where I'm misinterpreting this or where I missed the memo. We're testing 3.0.23d so we can upgrade from 3.0.14a. Our servers are all currently Solaris 9, and we build samba from source with MIT krb5 and openldap libraries. We have used security = ads since 3.0 after having

I'm testing SAMBA 3.0.2 on a Solaris 9 box with a UFS file system. The ACLs appear to be working well with the security tab, etc. However, once a permission setting has been made from a security tab on a directory, the mask and default mask parameters no longer appear in a getfacl. In addition, the #effective permission is incorrect. Has anyone seen this? I searched the archives and I

I think I've looked over every post that has acl or sid or winbind in it. I don't think this has been discussed quite this way. The symptom is similar to other posts but the environment is a bit different. We can do perms through samba, and we can see acls that have been set using setfacl, but we can't change the acls (e.g., add a user). We get: [2002/11/15 17:02:17, 0]

Hi, I get the error "Operation not permitted" when I try to delete a file as root, see some commands below. - there is no "i" attribute - it's a problem with the files and not the upper directories since I can delete a similar file in the same directory - fsck -f doesn't find any error on the partition - the partition is mounted rw If this is not the right place to

---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.1, Fedora 8 and PCI passthrough Date: Sunday 24 February 2008 From: jim burns <jim_burn@bellsouth.net> To: deshantm@gmail.com On Friday 22 February 2008 09:34:17 pm Todd Deshane wrote: > The configuration in both python and SXP format is covered in the xen user > manual [0]. > > Fedora still does make a

The mirror links point to openssh-3.1p1.tar.gz, but none of the sites have the file. The Linux RPM files are there though. Just thought you'd like to know, if you don't already. MB -- Mike Brown (mbrown at adacgeo.com) (Soon to be: Michael.L.Brown at Philips.com) ADAC, Madison, WI (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems) Desk: 608-288-6969 Fax: 608-298-2101 You design it, I'll build

Talking to myself again ;-) Samba-tool is working a little bit different then the silo/policy management on a Windows-DC. On a Windows-DC after assigning the user and host to the silo you have to assign the silo to the user and the host. When assigning the user and host to the silo with samba-tool, the assignment to the user and the host will be done at the same time. So now my policy looks

Hi Stefan, We had a long weekend in New Zealand, I'm catching up now to your emails. Some of the slight differences between Windows tools I've already picked up on and are in my PR Andrew Bartlett mentioned on Friday, but I'm always open to learning what things are missing or different etc. On 23/10/23 02:58, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: > Talking to myself again ;-) > >

Thanks Rob for chiming in. Stefan, I do want to be very clear, one of the big challanges that we as developers face building these kind of tools is that we don't run AD domains day-to-day. So we really value good feedback on the ergonomics. If you can test with our work in progress, we are keen to adapt the tooling where possible to be more in line with what is 'naturally expected, so

All, Since upgrading to 3.0.23d on several linux servers, I'm seeing the following error repeatedly in my logs: Jan 2 15:05:49 boothost smbd[27935]: [2007/01/02 15:05:49, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2332) Jan 2 15:05:49 boothost smbd[27935]: call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x90078): Currently not implemented. Aside from the obvious, what does this error mean? I've googled for

Hi I have problem with Mac OS X - when users trying save data from Mac's desktop or application (e.g. Quark) to share from Samba appear error "The Finder cannot complete the operation because some data in "file_name" could not be read or write (Error code -36)". When I copy data on Mac to Samba share from terminal everythink is OK. I found that resolution of this

I have a Samba-3.0.23d installed on a CentOS4.4 server that cannot be connected to from other machines in the same W2K3 ADS. The server was added to the ADS successfully via "kinit admin@REALM" and "net ads testjoin" works just fine. The clocks are NTP-synced and no clock slew errors are to be seen. If WinXP/Win2K3 clients connect using \\ip.address\ it works fine, but if they

Mrs.; I have a 16-bits Cobol program running at Novell 5.1. I'm migrating the whole network (around 150 terminais) to Linux + LTS processing DOSEMU into cluster and making a storage server just for data. My surprise last week was that the smbfs client for Linux doesn't support the file locking, after googling, found that a solution would be to use CIFS instead SMB and upgrading the

I'm new to Kerberos. I don't understand how Samba uses the system keytab (/etc/krb5.keytab) when "use kerberos keytab = true". Does Samba use service specific tickets? What tickets does Samba add? Do I need a cron job to keep them fresh or does Winbind take care of it? Sorry if these are elementary questions, but the Samba HOWTO didn't help me understand Samba's

Hi list, Im using Samba 3.0.23d on a Debian Etch box. Its configured as a ADS member. wbinfo -u returns correct domain users wbinfo -g returns correct domain groups getent passwd returns all users. I.e #KIC\kicass:*:10049:10002:kic ass:/home/KIC/kicass:/bin/false getent group returns correctly. .I.e KIC\xcello:x:10016:KIC\mats Executing chown KIC\\kicass test.txt works. Executing chgrp

Hi, Any one still having problems with "valid users" on 3.0.23d? I'm working in "security = USER" mode and with local users only. Share configuration : [private] path = /home/private valid users = papo force user = root force group = root read only = No create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 First test, anonymous

Greets again, samba-users, been offlist for quite a while now, Samba worked OK for me ... I am currently researching a problem on a server that hasn't been updated for years as it seems. Suse 9.1, Samba-rpm samba3-3.0.4-5 ... The problem is that files (that have been stored by Windows-clients via Samba) backed up by Amanda can't be restored correctly, as it seems this especially hits

Yesterday i installed then new SP1 RC for Microsoft Vista Enterprise, Since then I cant connect to our samba server any more. Samba is configured as ad member, with winbind and idmap backend = rid. Has anyone the same Problem ? Mit freundlichen Gr??en Michael M?ssler uhb consulting AG Chiemseering 1 84427 St. Wolfgang Tel.: 08085/939-131 Fax.: 08085/939-222 Web:

Good Morning I have not been able to find the binary file(s) for Solaris. I have downloaded the tarball for 3.0.23d, but when I go to run the "make all" command I get the following error: make: Fatal error: Command failed for target 'dynconfig.o' I have not been able to find a workaround for it. Do you have any suggestions? I am running this on a Solaris 10 (release 11/06)

Hi, i've installed Samba 3.0.23d on Solaris 10 (SPARC) with MIT Kerberos 1.5.1, openLDAP 2.3.30 and openSSL 0.9.8d. I have 2 Windows Server 2003 SP1 Domain Controller and about 20 Windows XP SP2 clients. My problem is that i can't get a kerberos ticket to join the domain. If i try to get a ticket with 'kinit Administrator@PONTOS.LOCAL' i get always the error kinit(v5): KDC