similar to: 3.0.24 and disappearing ACL entries

Hello, yesterday i posted this issue on snapshot-discuss at listsourceforge.net (subject: wondering why backup wont start), but after reading the FAQ and searching the bugzilla DB i thought it could help to post here as well. i have a problem. But let me first describe my setup. i followed this howto: http://dev.kprod.net/?q=linux-backup-rsnapshot-no-root Now there is a backup server rpi-home

Hello, I found in the forum two threads about point biserial correlation. One of them (1) mentioned "a point-biserial correlation is just a Pearson correlation where one of the variables is dichotomous. Thus, the command is just the normal cor function". The other (2) mentioned "Professor Fox's package polycor" as a way to calculate point biserial correlation?

Hello guys, sorry for cross-posting, but imho it could be an error in my rsnapshot setup as well as in my rsync setup. If there is a solution on one of these mailing-lists i will post it to the other one as well. ok? here is my question: when running rsnapshot, my exclude filter is being ignored, but i don't see why. grep -v "#" /etc/rsnapshot-debx40.conf | grep . gives

Everyone, I have finally resolved the new heartburn 3.0.24 on Ubuntu Feisty was giving me and have stumbled upon some information that might help others out there. I was seeing problems with ACL entries getting mangled and disappearing, Excel making files read only and extended attributes doing bizarre things. The solution revolved around what appears to be a change in how ACLs are managed.

Hi Ralph, Am 18.12.24 um 18:59 schrieb Ralph Boehme via samba: > Hi Stefan > > On 12/18/24 5:40 PM, Stefan Kania via samba wrote: >> skania at cluster01:~$ ls -ld /glusterfs/admin-share/daten1/.snaps >> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096? 1. Jan 1970 /glusterfs/admin-share/ >> daten1/.snaps > > what are the permissions of *each* path component > > # ls -ld /

Hello, I'm lost :-( I got a share: ------------------------ [global] workgroup = example netbios name = cluster security = ads realm = EXAMPLE.NET idmap config *:range = 10000-19999 idmap config example:backend = rid idmap config example:range = 1000000-1999999 map acl inherit = yes winbind use default domain =

Sorry hehehehe I mean, when access RSAT and add the "Home Folder" of the User, and give a Apply, the folder is automatically created with the permissions below, where the "Domain Users" is already linked: getfacl rs-01 / # File: rs-01 / # Owner: administrator # Group: domain \ 040users user :: rwx user: rs-01: rwx user: administrator: rwx group :: r-x group: domain \

Just a tip. If you create users with RSAT and you also uses unix id's ( UID/GID ) Used with AD backend. The first assign the UID/GID and then apply the home dir folders in RSAT. Only for user home dirs. This can help if you also use ssh to login and you cant enter your own home dir. Per example: Your ACL ( for the user ) > # File: rs-01 / > # Owner: administrator > # Group:

I've set up a profiles share according to the wiki article: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Implementing_roaming_profiles Users are able to create new roaming profiles and they cannot browse each others' profiles, so all that is working. The only issue is that the group "domain admins" does not have privileges to read or delete user profiles. The acls on the profiles directory

On 28/03/2023 15:08, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: > > On 3/28/23 01:33, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 28/03/2023 01:59, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: >>> I am having troubles with windows ACLs.? I have been following the >>> wiki >>> (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs) and must have messed

Hi Carlos, Your problem is userA can access home directory of userB? If your issue is only that, then you are right, this issue comes from the fact all AD users are, by default, in "Domain users" and your Home directories grant "Domain Users" "r-x" which means "read and enter" when applied to directory. Simply remove "Domain Users" from these

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:19:09 -0700 Mark Nienberg via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I've set up a profiles share according to the wiki article: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Implementing_roaming_profiles > > Users are able to create new roaming profiles and they cannot browse > each others' profiles, so all that is working. The only issue is that >

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Jonathan Hunter <jmhunter1 at gmail.com> wrote: > It sounds as though there are files on your servers owned by a UID or GID > (most probably a GID) that is not in /etc/group, and is being looked up and > "reverse resolved" to 'NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users', but this somehow > doesn't map back the other way, i.e. from a

On 2019-12-08 15:01, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 08/12/2019 18:18, Howard Fleming via samba wrote: >> I am building a Samba4 setup to replace a Samba3 server I built for >> small non profit school back in 2012. >> >> It is running CentOS 6.x, samba version 3.6.23-52.el6_10. ?Rather >> than attempt to upgrade this system to Samba4, it makes more sense

Hallo We are trying to migrate from an old Windows server to a Linux samba system. As we are also replacing the old AD, we exported the permissions as SDDLs from the old share and set them to the new system, using "samba-tool". In general it seems to work quite well, but there is a strange behavior. ----- ----- root at smb-01:/# samba-tool ntacl set

Hi Roland, Thanks for the reply. Memory usage on both machines seem fine. The server has 4GB's of RAM, of which about 3GB is used during the file list build and about 1.5GB is used during the actual transfer. The client has 16GB of RAM with a peak usage of 8.5GB. I just tried three transfers in a row and it consistently breaks at a certain point, after which I get the "ERROR: out of

Hello! I am following the how to https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/User_home_drives But even though there reported a process for User X does not access the home of Y User, this is happening root at fileserver:/srv/samba# getfacl home/ # file: home/ # owner: root # group: root user::rwx user:root:rwx user:administrator:rwx group::r-x group:root:r-x group:5007:r-x group:domain\040admins:rwx

> >>>> Run this : getfacl /home/users > >>> getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names > >>> # file: home/users > >>> # owner: root > >>> # group: A\\domain\040admins > >>> user::rwx > >>> user:root:rwx > >>> user:10512:rwx > >>> group::rwx > >>>

On 2017-04-24 01:44, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 20:53:39 +1000 > Henry via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> root at aphrodite:~# getfacl -d /srv/samba/data/Testing >> getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names >> # file: srv/samba/data/Testing >> # owner: root >> # group: domain\040admins >>

Yes, I removed "--no-inc-recursive", without success. -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 12:24 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Have you tried removing --no-inc-recursive yet? > > On 03/27/2015 07:19 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > > Hi Roland, > > >