similar to: Resharing a Remotely Mounted CIFS share

Hi there, we have a customer with some old Windows 98 stuff. The network has been migrated to a 2008 domain and Windows 98 won't authenticate (and thus can not access shares, also all computer names (DC's / fileservers) are longer than 8 characters). Figured I would mount the shares on the fileservers on a linux box (ubuntu 10.04 LTS 64 bit server) and then export them again through

Hi all, I've recently run into a situation whereby I need samba to tackle a task. It is complicated by multi-vendor infrastructure. I am hoping that someone here has the knowledge and experience to say: "been there, done that...here is how..." To give some background to the architecture (slightly exotic)... 1. We run a large Sun SAM-FS/QFS installation (a high end

Hello Gordon, Thursday, December 11, 2014, 5:23:56 PM, you wrote: GM> The system will mount a GM> filesytem on top of an existing path, including one with another GM> filesystem at the same path. But the mounts are identical- \\\\10.0.0.253\\niamh on /NSA320-music type cifs (rw) \\\\10.0.0.253\\niamh on /NSA320-music type cifs (rw) \\\\10.0.0.253\\niamh on /NSA320-music type cifs

Hello, How can this happen? mount -l /dev/sda3/ on type ext4 (rw) proc on /proc type proc (rw) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw) /dev/sda1 on /boot type ext4 (rw) /dev/sdb1 on /music type ext3 (rw) /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 on /fedora type ext3 (rw) none on /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc type binfmt_misc (rw)

I've tried some internet and list searching, but I haven't been able to find anybody with the same issue. It's hard to search for "samba cifs force user problem" because it hits nearly every samba tech support question ever asked. The smbfs kernel module disappeared from the stock fedora kernels recently *crycry* Now my shares that were mounted via smbfs have to be mounted

Hai, What happens if you add to the mount the option -mSMB2 If that does not work, tell the exact running OS, RH (NR) , Centos (NR) And samba version. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Krishna G via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 13 februari 2019 15:41 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >

I'm currently struggeling with a cifs mount from a windows 2003 server. The share can be mounted with mount.cifs, but despite using the rw mount option, the mountpoint can only be accessed read-only. Trying to write on the share results in a permission denied error. This happens on a 2.4.21 kernel with the shipped CIFS kernel module. The mount command used is: mount.cifs

Hi everyone I have these shares in smb.conf: [home2] path = /home2 read only = No [home] path = /home2/home read only = No I mount [home] on a Linux client like this: mount -t cifs //hh1/home2 /home2 -osec=krb5,rw,multiuser Here is the output of the mount command: //hh1/home2 on /home2 type cifs

On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: > Hello, > > I have the problem that the ACLs are ignored when I mount a share via > cifs. I have an AD with Samba 4.1.6 Ubuntu 14.04 (but I also tried it > with Gentoo and samba 4.1.14). So I joined a member server like the > wiki describes. Everything works fine. I can manage the users and > permissions with the RSAT tools.

On 12/11/2014 09:02 AM, Niamh Holding wrote: > How can this happen? There's nothing really abnormal about that. The system will mount a filesytem on top of an existing path, including one with another filesystem at the same path. They stack, so that you'd need to unmount all four instances.

On 12/11/2014 10:24 AM, Niamh Holding wrote: > Thursday, December 11, 2014, 5:23:56 PM, you wrote: > > GM> The system will mount a > GM> filesytem on top of an existing path, including one with another > GM> filesystem at the same path. > > But the mounts are identical- Yeah, that's allowed. > GM> They stack, so that you'd need to unmount > GM>

>The smbfs kernel module disappeared from the stock fedora kernels >recently *crycry* Now my shares that were mounted via smbfs have to be >mounted via cifs. cifs is, apparantly, not a drop-in replacement for >smbfs however, as it behaves differnetly with the same configuration >options. Indeed, it does seem to be backwards in compatability as apposed to backwards compatable.

I have a Samba 3.0.23a-1.fc5.1 configured on a Fedora 5 server. It's joined to an Active Directory 2003 domain controller using Winbind, etc. I'm able to connect from various workstations using active directory user accounts/credentials just fine to shares on this server, permissions work, and all is well. I'm guessing this is set up correctly. However, from another Fedora 5 server,

Hello world; currently I am running into some strange problem with a setup that incorporates servers running Windows 2003 and Debian GNU stable (samba 3.0.14). Here's the situation: * There's a share on the windows box that the unix machines need to access. This is mounted using CIFS with uid= / oid= options to ensure the desired unix user account is able to access the data in the share.

Am 22.01.2015 um 13:14 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 22/01/15 11:52, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >> Am 22.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I have the problem that the ACLs are ignored when I mount a share >>>> via cifs. I have an AD with Samba 4.1.6 Ubuntu

On 22/01/15 12:57, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: > Am 22.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have the problem that the ACLs are ignored when I mount a share >>> via cifs. I have an AD with Samba 4.1.6 Ubuntu 14.04 (but I also >>> tried it with Gentoo and samba 4.1.14). So

Hey all, As most of you know, I've been having problems (hopefully solved by now, won't know until friend is able to reshare his box) with SAMBA over the internet. On my local area network, I am using SAMBA for a one way connection just fine. my question is as follows. Can I make an fstab entry so I can mount the XP share whenever I boot? The reason I ask is because currently Wine

Am 22.01.2015 um 13:37 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On 22/01/15 12:22, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >> Am 22.01.2015 um 13:14 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> On 22/01/15 11:52, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>>> Am 22.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>>>> On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>

On 23/01/15 07:34, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: > > Am 22.01.2015 um 17:17 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> On 22/01/15 12:57, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>> Am 22.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>>> On 22/01/15 10:53, Norbert Heinzelmann wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> I have the problem that the ACLs are ignored when I

Hi, We are facing difficulties writing to Alternate Data Streams (ADS) on a Windows CIFS mount on CentOS/RHEL Linux. Steps followed on both machine: -------------------------------------------- On RHEL(cifs.ko version: 1.68) 1. Created sample.txt file using vim with come content inside the Windows CIFS share mounted on linux. 2. Then wrote some content with “vim