Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "Will *not* be providing RedHat 9 packages for Samba 3.0.25"
2006 Oct 06
1
[Fwd: Interdomain Trust: winbind not working]
Anyone?
Could you write me the exact steps to have a working
configuration of Samba/winbind domain trusting Windows 2000 Dom?
I've followed the one proposed in the samba howtos but is not
working.
thanks
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Samba] Interdomain Trust: winbind not working
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:09:49 +0200
From: Matteo Calcagnini <calcagnini@publinet.it>
To:
2019 Mar 26
1
http error when updating 7.5 ==> 7.6
On 3/25/19 8:32 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> This is not the first time we have had issues with drpms in the update tree.
> Would anyone be opposed to taking away deltarpms from the repositories?
>
> They take up lots of space and they have cause multiple issues in the past.
>
> Thoughts?
Due to the disk churn deltarpms need and our own internal mirroring of centos packages, one
2005 Feb 16
3
rpc trust gives NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE with 3.0.11
When I try to establish a trust from SAMBA 3.0.11 to Windows 2003 I get the
error: NT_STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE. I have no problem the other way. I had no
problem either, when I ran SAMBA 3.0.9, and the problem disappeared when I
down-graded to 3.0.9.
Here is what happens ('CALYPSO' is the Windows-server and 'KONTOR' is its
domain-name):
[root@linux /root]# net rpc trustdom
2008 Jul 03
2
Error building Samba 3.2.0 with gcc 2.96
I have tried to build Samba 3.2 with an old compiler gcc 2.96.
It gave only one single error:
groupdb/mapping_tdb.c: In function `add_mapping_entry':
groupdb/mapping_tdb.c:130: incompatible types in return
The offending line says:
return NULL;
in a function of type 'bool'.
Is this a bug, or am I using a far too old compiler?
Thorkil Olesen.
2013 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] EE, JIT, MCJIT class structure
Yes, we've been planning to separate the execution engines for a while now, and we've made some small steps (such as breaking out the RTDyldMemoryManager interface) in preparation for doing so. There are some serious entanglements, not least of which there are MCJIT clients (LLDB, for instance) which are using memory managers derived from the JITMemoryManager. Eventually (and soon)
2008 Jan 25
7
Trusted domain user login
Greetings,
We are currently experiencing logon problems with a trusted domain user(s).
Example: We have DomainA and DomainB
DomainA and DomainB both have workstations joined on their respective
domain.
DomainA and DomainB both have trust relationships. DomainA trusts DomainB
and vise versa.
DomainA is where being served by a Samba PDC, while DomainB has a PDC using
Windows NT 4.0 Server
When
2021 Aug 02
0
Happy Sysadmins day!
Hello fellow NUT users and contributors!
A lot has happened during the past months, culminating with last Friday of
July (Sysadmins' Day) as a reasonable moment to mark a milestone. Sorry,
not yet NUT 2.7.5, but with CI make-over to help it happen.
As some may know, we were using the public Travis CI offering, and just as
that multi-platform setup was nearing perfection (ha-ha) with dozens
2021 Aug 02
0
Happy Sysadmins day!
Hello fellow NUT users and contributors!
A lot has happened during the past months, culminating with last Friday of
July (Sysadmins' Day) as a reasonable moment to mark a milestone. Sorry,
not yet NUT 2.7.5, but with CI make-over to help it happen.
As some may know, we were using the public Travis CI offering, and just as
that multi-platform setup was nearing perfection (ha-ha) with dozens
2016 Feb 08
3
Vectorization with fast-math on irregular ISA sub-sets
On 8 February 2016 at 16:33, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com> wrote:
> The loop vectorizer does indeed require -ffast-math, but the IEEE-nonconformant transforms it does are far greater than using an ISA which may FTZ. It needs -ffast-math because any FP reductions necessarily have their execution order shuffled, due to executing some of them in parallel and reducing to scalar at
2004 Aug 06
4
Patches - Was: Stream metadata settings
Here I go again.
This is the second patch, it adds the ability to override some YP settings
on the server.
<yp-override>1</yp-override>
If this is not set, we don't override the yp flag.
<yp-public>1</yp-public>
When this is set, the stream will be public or non public, according to
it's content. This only works when yp-override is set. It allows to
suppress
2007 Nov 28
2
Change in smbclient between 3.0.24 and 3.0.25c breaks third party app
Hello list,
A change in smbclient between 3.0.24 and 3.0.25c breaks [1] the gollem
filemanager [2] and maybe others.
In particular folder creation is broken unless the folder is a top level
folder on the share.
To create a subfolder "level2" in the folder /level1 of a share gollem
executes this command:
/usr/bin/smbclient "//1.2.3.4/sharename" "-p139"
2007 Sep 14
0
R: R: howwinbind cache time works
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
(CC'ing back on list)
Gianluca Culot wrote:
> When the users change their passwords on the AD domain server
> it takes one hour before winbind starts refusing the old
> password (as it is in cache, I suppose)
Nope. This is a Windows DC bug.
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2874
Unless you have enabled "winbind
2006 Jul 11
1
{bugzilla,news}.samba.org are temporaily down
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
Just a heads up for everyone. We are aware of the problem
and are continuing to work on resolving it.
cheers, jerry
=====================================================================
Samba ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com
"What man
2007 May 18
0
New snapshot of patched 3.0.24 posted
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I've posted an updated version of my 3.0.24-gc dev branch
to deal with the break in "force group" caused by the
CVE-2007-2444 patch and backported the Vista related bug
fixes from the Samba patches page.
The bzr branch is hosted at
http://people.samba.org/bzr/jerry/samba-3-0-24-gc.bzr/
The source tarball is available from
2007 Jun 04
0
mailq flushed from bugzilla.samba.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Just a note:
You might see a flood of bug report emails. I've fixed a
problem with the MTA on bugzilla.samba.org.
cheers, jerry
=====================================================================
Samba ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris ----------- http://www.centeris.com
2006 Feb 22
1
Does anyone use rhosts or hosts equiv autentication in Samba ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
I'm looking to remove some more old code. Does anyone use
either of these features currently?
cheers, jerry
=====================================================================
I live in a Reply-to-All world -----------------------
Samba ------- http://www.samba.org
Centeris
2006 Mar 02
1
New Samba wiki on-line
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
We've brought a new wiki online at http://wiki.samba.org/ for
Samba users and developers alike. The intent is to allow
the community to fill the gap in dynamic or temporary
documentation and other relevant information. Our thanks
to Craig White who has volunteered to act as standing editor
(at least at first). But in general, the wiki
2006 Jun 04
0
Enabling a user w/ more than 14 char passwd prompts for a password.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Warren Beldad wrote:
> I have created a user with a password of 15 characters...
> then disable:
> -bash-3.00# smbpasswd -d user1
> Disabled user user1.
>
> Enable:
> -bash-3.00# smbpasswd -e user1
> New SMB password:
>
> Why is this happening? Is there any limitation for
> the number of password characters?
>
2006 Jul 13
0
Fedora packages or Enterprise packages of Samba on RH EL4?
CentOS4 RPMS for x86-64 would be awesome.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Hoover, Network Administrator
KSU - Salina, College of Technology and Aviation
(785) 826-2660
"Don't Blend in..."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From:
2006 Nov 14
0
Does Samba cache it's initial netbios name?
I just found out that when doing a new installation in works. But as
soon as I change the netbios name in the smb.conf the trouble begins...
Everything can connect, but then suddenly the error does appear. Does
Samba cache it's initial netbios name somewhere?
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Sander van Harmelen
Verzonden: dinsdag 14 november 2006 13:59
Aan: Sander van Harmelen;