similar to: close_low_fds

It seems that my smbd process got fuxed somehow. It appears to have take up all the file handles, and there were over 130 smbd processes running on the system. I'm not entirely sure what happened. My first thought is that something bad happened between the server and the Windows client that's running Kaza (with a couple hundred mid-download files) and it just spiraled out of control,

hello, using SuSE 7.3 with all Patches and SAMBA 2.2.7a-SuSE after a couple of days too many files are opend (bejond 16000) and samba hast to be totally stopped and restartet. the log tells us the following: [2003/03/13 09:21:44, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(919) create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID S-1-5-21-823518204-1202660629-842925246-2721 to uid or gid. [2003/03/13

I use Samba 3.0.23d at FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p25 as PDC and sometimes Microsoft Workgroup Add-On for MS-DOS and Mail as client. At FreeBSD box I have directory /common/install/postgreSQL and symlink to it: /usr/export/XP/i386/\$oem\$/install/postgreSQL -> /common/install/postgreSQL The path /usr/export/XP shared for MS Network as XP and mount via net use X: \\my_server\XP. So files and

hi all, I encountered some problem with lowercasing chars like an "?" with user_attrs like this: user_attrs = uid=home=/mail/%Lu, =myvar=%L{ldap:uid} the ? doesnt get lower cased in both cases # doveadm user BL?TULA field value user bl?tula uid vmail gid vmail home /mail/bl?tula mail maildir:~/Maildir:LAYOUT=fs:INBOX=~/Maildir/INBOX myvar bl?tula somebody knows if there a fix for

Hello, All! I found that Samba checks description fields encoding at various tdb files to late. Case 1. FreeBSD with UTF-8 support. At some cases FreeBSD's adduser script can save incorrect UTF-8 sequence to GECOS /etc/passwd field. (Here is example http://www.acc.tula.ru/~acc107_3/samba/miscoding/gecos.txt) When user is added to Samba, Samba reads GECOS field "as is" without

Hello, This is not a Samba question itself, but it's somewhat related to Samba. I am planning to replace the two Windows 2000 Server servers in a client company with two Samba PDCs with LDAP backend. Currently, those W2K servers hold the Active Directory and the the antivirus management console. And this is the only nuisance we are finding when moving from Windows Server to Samba PDC. If

I have Samba PDC and use tdbsam backend. I use the version 3.0.11, but recently I have exchanged it for the version 3.0.23c. Now I have a number of problem. Here is one of then. I wish to move one user "gad" from Domain Users (RID 513) to Domain Guests (RID 514). Now Primary group of user "gad" is "Domain Users": pdbedit -Lv gad -d0 Unix username: gad NT

Hello, All! Everytime when I ask my PDC about list of domain groups from XP SP3 workstation, I got empty list. Log is fixed this error: api_rpcTNP: samr: SAMR_QUERYDISPLAYINFO2 failed But "net groupmap list" shows group list: sudo net groupmap list 2-106 (S-1-5-21-3738234612-4042114426-1695072666-3013) -> 5-107 tst-users (S-1-5-21-3738234612-4042114426-1695072666-3193) ->

Hi, I spotted today following line at my FreeBSD 4.6.2-RELEASE IPFIREWALL log: Jul 1 13:34:35 fbsd /kernel: ipfw: 1400 Accept TCP xxxxxx:22 yyyyy:22 in via ed1 where xxxxxx is the attacker's IP and yyyyy is my box. But in sshd log, there are no traces left behind by this connection. Normally, there is "Did not receive identification string from xxx" etc, when somebody tries to

Just to get these things out of the way CentOS (2.6.9-42.0.10.ELsmp) # yum list installed | grep openssl openssl.i686 0.9.7a-43.14 installed openssl-devel.i586 0.9.7a-43.14 installed # yum list installed | grep samba samba.i386 3.0.10-1.4E.11 installed samba-client.i386

Hi, I''ve just installed 0.22.2 and believe I''ve discovered a bug (or oversight). I have an exec like this: exec { "change-to-local-mirror": command => "sed -i ''s#\(KERNEL_REPO.*=\).*#\1 $mirror#'' ${rulefile}", path => "/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin",

Hi, I need to change ownership of server files to user/group defined in active directory ( using rfc2307 and unix attributes). Chown returns no error, but 'ls -lia' shows that file ownership is unchanged. What am I doing wrong? archive-test:/archive/video # ls -lia ./test.mp4 17121 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2413096 ноя 2 19:50 ./test.mp4 archive-test:/archive/video # wbinfo -u

Any chance of this being implemented in fbsd? Could be usefull ;-) ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3514.txt -- :{ andyf@speednet.com.au Andy Farkas System Administrator Speednet Communications http://www.speednet.com.au/

On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com > wrote: > On 07/11/15 16:02, Krutskikh Ivan wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I need to change ownership of server files to user/group defined in active >> directory ( using rfc2307 and unix attributes). Chown returns no error, >> but >> 'ls -lia' shows that file ownership

Hello folks, I''ve blended/updated the Glossary of Terms (<http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/GlossaryOfTerms>). It seems the definition of "manifests" is a bit different amongst members. Some people consider a "manifest" to be a configuration file written in puppet, e.g. any .pp file. But at my organization, we''ve considered the totality

I have Samba 3.0.23d. My log level is 5. Every day in each user's log I see this records: [2006/12/18 16:39:39, 5] smbd/uid.c:change_to_root_user(275) change_to_root_user: now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) what does it mean?

What does mean this bizarre msgid? maillog: Mar 31 19:31:15 cu sm-mta[5352]: h2VFVEGS005352: from=<nb@sindbad.ru>, size=1737, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAfp4Fa2ShPE2u4pP/QpPDIMKAAAAQAAAAj+zb4Isbuk+tYEPVF9Vf, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=wg.pu.ru [193.124.85.219] -- Nikolaj I. Potanin, SA http://www.drweb.ru ID

May want to check out the new Fedora-Extras-based EPEL repo. There will be overlap with KBS repos (in fact they cite karan.org as an example of rebuilding Fedora Extras packages for EL4), RPMforge, etc. so be wary as of any other 3rd party repo. The Wiki page says "The EPEL repository is not yet publicly available -- we are in the process of creation and initial testing phase.";

What's the easiest path to having my Atheros wireless cards supported, particularly in C5? In the past, I've chosen to download source and build my own, but that's become a little tiresome. At one point, OpenSUSE was the easy option, but since 10.1 it's dropped madwifi. -- Cheers John -- spambait 1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Please do not

I'm experiencing some problems with Samba-LDAP and I wanna know a little more about the structure of SSID. Does anyone know where I can find information about this? -- Allysson Steve Mota Lacerda stevelacerda@stevelacerda.net http://www.stevelacerda.net