similar to: samba reporting wrong space

hello everybody! i have a samba (3.0.24) running on a gentoo (alpha) box. i connect to a share using cifs and when i then run df -h, i get the following ahuemer@xeon distfiles % df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 34G 31G 3.3G 91% / udev 759M 2.8M 756M 1% /dev shm 759M 20K 759M

While exploring some btrfs maintenance with respect to defragmenting I ran the following commands: # filefrag /path/to/34G.file /path/to/5.7G.file /path/to/34G.file: 2406 extents found /path/to/5.7G.file: 572 extents found Thinking those mostly static files could be less fragmented I ran: # btrfs filesystem defragment -c /path/to/34G.file # btrfs filesystem defragment -c /path/to/5.7G.file and

I see very odd results from rsync 2.4.7pre1, the latest cvs version (sept 12, i think was the last modified file). We have a number of network-attached storage devices. 10/100 ethernet, nfs2 mounted (under nfs3, they buffer deletes, and recursive deletions fail). Usually, these are kept syncronized across a wan by a nightly cronjob, We have a few we keep in reserve, which we syncronize

Hello, today i typed "htop" for controlling my ressources. I could see that my swap is neraly 100%. This problem occurs since start of the server, about 3 year ago. Its not a critical issue for me, because the server is running fine. Several times i incereased the size of swap. Today 9,3GB of 10GB swap are allocated (33 day uptime). My system is still running and i have no

Hello group, I'm having a very hard time rsyncing efficiently a MySQL database which contains very large binary blobs. (Actually, it's the database of Mantis bug tracker [http://www.mantisbt.org/], with file attachments stored directly in the table rows. I know it's a bad idea from many other reasons, but let's say it was given to me as such.) First, I was dumping the

On 03/12/15 09:40, Bernard Lheureux wrote: > On 12/03/2015 10:29 AM, Duncan Brown wrote: > initramfs is missing... > check if /boot/initramfs-{kernelversion}.img is correctly there, if not > do a "yum reinstall kernel-{version}" and it should be ok ! You might want to also check there is enough diskspace for the initrd to be built and hosted in the right place.. --

Hello, i am creating my XEN VM with virt-install (see below). When I create new images i do first an "df -h" to see if there is still enough space left on the drive. Are the XEN images pre allocated or does XEN only use that space that really is used by the VM inside the image? I know have the Problem that an "du -h" inside my /VM folder gives me nearly a higher number that

Package: xen-utils-4.0 Version: 4.0.1-5.2 After clean upgrade from Lenny I got xend highly use CPU resources causing domU don't being created - due to timeouts for vifs and vbds (mostly CPU Steal Time was increasing - no iowaits). Tried Xen boot options acpi=noirq|ht without success. Option acpi=off solved that issue, but performance of the server was horrible. The final workaround was to

Hi! With 3.2-rc4 (probably earlier), Ext4 seems to remember what areas it trimmed: merkaba:~> fstrim -v /boot /boot: 224657408 bytes were trimmed merkaba:~> fstrim -v /boot /boot: 0 bytes were trimmed But BTRFS does not: merkaba:~> fstrim -v / /: 4431613952 bytes were trimmed merkaba:~> fstrim -v / /: 4341846016 bytes were trimmed Is it planned to add this feature to BTRFS

on solaris7/sparc this device doesn't exists i can use EGD but he very big (perl script!) - in memory it take about 4mb! apache use the same! why ssh1.27 doesn't requre /dev/urandom on solaris? what alternatives exists?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I browsed the mailinglist and saw the Wiki, disabled the management features using FreeDOS. I''m using the 1.9.1 firmware. ...still the bridge kills the interface. Is there a solution for the problem? Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -

When I try to umount btrfs filesystem I get always this error with kernel 3.11.4 and 3.11.3, but I can mount and umount without error on kernel 3.11.2. Exact error messages are: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 23s! [btrfs-transacti:680] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 23s! [umount:1575] I''m on Fedora 19 I have run scrub and there are no errors: # btrfs scrub status /home scrub

Hello people, I have been experiencing a weird problem with 4.8-STABLE for a long time. I was ignoring it, thinking that it was a problem with the SCSI disks or perhaps the contoller. I changed the disks from the original Intel box to a Compaq box and I still noticed the problem was there. What happened is that all of a sudden, the disk would 'fill' up with nothing! Yes, that's true.

Hi, I've got the same Problem. Not with WinMe but Win 98SE. But what I figured out is, that it doesn't realy apply to the Command.com rather to the Way the BootImage was created. It took me a long time to get my Hands on a Image with 2.8MB that's working. Since creating one my self, was allways failling. I downloaded the Bootutils 4.3 from 3com and used the Imageedit tools. With these

I am installing wine 1.1.26 on suse 9.2. I am installing it from source. I can't get it to install. Everything goes well until I get this far. This is the first error that I got: gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../../include -I../../../include -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -Wall-pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wwrite-strings -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -o package.o package.c gcc1: out of memory allocating 287975456

Greetings, I am acquiring a new computer in order to conduct data analysis. I currently have a 32-bit Vista OS with 3G of RAM and I consistently run into memory allocation problems. I will likely be required to run Windows 7 on the new system, but have flexibility as far as hardware goes. Can people recommend the best hardware to minimize memory allocation problems? I am leaning towards dual

Hi there. I have 2 servers with this number of disks in each side: pve01:~# df | grep disco /dev/sdd 1.0T 9.4G 1015G 1% /disco1TB-0 /dev/sdh 1.0T 9.3G 1015G 1% /disco1TB-3 /dev/sde 1.0T 9.5G 1015G 1% /disco1TB-1 /dev/sdf 1.0T 9.4G 1015G 1% /disco1TB-2 /dev/sdg 2.0T 19G 2.0T 1% /disco2TB-1 /dev/sdc 2.0T 19G 2.0T 1%

Hi.. Well i've tried each and every method to insert any winme command.com into any bootable image and its really giving me problems.... I even further tested the same image with reinserting the 98 command.com and the image worked just fine.. So acc to me the problem has to lie in me command.com as there is no real mode dos in ME.. Also try using umbpci.sys and lowdma.sys for managing

OK, so our old MDS had hardware issues so I configured a new MGS / MDS on a VM (this is a backup lustre filesystem and I wanted to separate the MGS / MDS from OSS of the previous), and then did this: For example: mount -t ldiskfs /dev/old /mnt/ost_old mount -t ldiskfs /dev/new /mnt/ost_new rsync -aSv /mnt/ost_old/ /mnt/ost_new # note trailing slash on ost_old/ If you are unable to connect both

If it's replica 2, you can loose up to 1 replica per distribution group.For example, if you have a volume TEST with such setup: server1:/brick1 server2:/brick1 server1:/brick2 server2:/brick2 You can loose any brick of the replica "/brick1" and any brick in the replica "/brick2". So if you loose server1:/brick1 and server2:/brick2 -> no data loss will be experienced.