similar to: First time linux and samba user having 100% cpu usage by smbd.

hi, i've a problem with samba 3.0.2. there is one windows ME client which used to work with out any problems. now, as soon as the user connects (sharelevel: user, or share - i've tried both) on smbd is forked which causes 90 to 100% cpu load. when i stop samba (smbd/nmbd) this proces does not die i can only get rid of it whit a kill -9. with this no data can be transfered from or to

hi, i've a problem with a windos 98 client. there is one linux samba server an one single windows 98 client. as soon as the clinet logs on to samba a dmbd is forked which causes 100% cpu load. as the level 10 logs are quite large and the ml does not allow mails of that size i've put them on a webserver: http://www.mhcsoftware.de/smb/log.smbd http://www.mhcsoftware.de/smb/log.nmbd

hi, i've a problem with samba 3.0.2. there is one windows ME client which used to work with out any problems. now, as soon as the user connects (sharelevel: user, or share - i've tried both) on smbd is forked which causes 90 to 100% cpu load. when i stop samba (smbd/nmbd) this proces does not die i can only get rid of it whit a kill -9. with this no data can be transfered from or to

I would like to run FreeBSD 7 on a HP ML110 G5. I understand from past posts to this list that the ML110 series is FreeBSD friendly, but what about RAID 1 using the on-board SATA controller? Will this work and how do you set this up? Regards Tom Munro Glass

Icecast uses 99.9% cpu usage with one listener and thats me locally! Samba,apache,mysql,proftpd,ssh, and every other application i can possibly run and try to cause load on my server , it wont get this high, how do i fix this? <p>I compiled the latest 1.3.12 icecast source. 17769 root 15 0 2256 2192 1084 R 99.9 0.5 2720m icecast <p>--- >8 ---- List archives:

We are seeing the SMBD process sitting at 99.9% Are there any step-by-step troubleshooting guides to track the source of the problem? -Jeremy

I have the same problem and am running 1.3.12 as well. Any response on this? --- lazybrain <lazybrain@rcn.com> wrote: > Icecast uses 99.9% cpu usage with one listener and thats me > locally! > > Samba,apache,mysql,proftpd,ssh, and every other application i can > possibly > run and try to cause load on my server > , it wont get this high, how do i fix this? > >

Hi, I am running * on centos5 using 4core cpu. When it is busy, * uses 99.9% of cpu max. How can I make * to use more cpu power? Thanks.

Hello I recently deployed a Samba 4.0.21 running as classic pdc on freebsd 10 version RELEASE-p9, most of shares are in a ZFS volume with vfs_zfsacl module, some smbd processes stays constantly with around 70% cpu usage sometimes 90% and dies with signal 11 according the log message , i also tried enable debug level 10 but didn't show anything helpful or maybe i wasn't able to

Thanks. In my rc.icecast script, I put a >/tmp/icecast.out and a 2>/tmp/icecast.err to try and follow your advice. When I turned it on, I got alot of "You can run, but you can't hide" lines over and over in the icecast.out file. I tracked it down in the code and found src/admin.c was printing the message. The function handle_admin function has a while loop that prints the

Hello all, I've been using Samba for a few years now and have finally come across a problem that I can't seem to sort out myself so I thought I'd use your intelligence instead... Heres the situation. I've got a Linux box (2.4.17) acting as a PDC for some dual boot Linux/NT boxen. Currently users have a single home directory (over NIS to Linux and Samba to Windows) with separate

Do you know what can cause the smbd process to steal out the cpu usage (99%) and keep running like that for days? I have a Samba PDC 3.0.1pre3 running on top of RH9 2.4.20 kernel. Below is the current top report. Strangely, the PDC still responds in reasonable good response times to heavy network duty.traced the log.%machine name% and didn't find anything . I haven't tried to restart smb

Hello all, I am facing as serious problem when running asterisk in HP server.We are developing application to make the outbound calls in PRI lines .We normally uses IBM machine as our servers ,and it was working fine for all installation.For the cost reduction we this time tried with HP server. Model(HP proliant ml110). When we make the calls the there is a lots of disturbance in the sound even

I think the problem is that your icecast is wrong configured. If it has an configuratrion error that dows not shut it down at startup, it takes 99,9% cpu usage (thats my problem with, for example, a wrong path to configuration file at startup, or something like this). Greets, Stefan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Hart" <heytph@yahoo.com> To: <icecast@xiph.org>

I made a post a few weeks ago regarding this but was unable to find a solution. This is the situation: + I'm attempting to upgrade from samba 3.0.23a (Fedora core package 3.0.23a-1.fc4.1) to the latest version compiled from Samba source. + When using the latest version (or 3.0.25b), Win clients can authenticate & access shares fine, but attempting to open any kind of MS Office doc (not

Hi! I have install Centos 5.5 on HP ProLiant ML110 G6 with RAID-1 hardware active. (00:1f.2 RAID bus controller: Intel Corporation 5 Series/3400 Series Chipset SATA RAID Controller (rev 05)) I have follow this suggest:

Hi again, puppetd started to hang with 100% CPU usage all of the sudden. Strace just keeps repeating these 2 lines: --- SIGVTALRM (Virtual timer expired) @ 0 (0) --- sigreturn() = ? (mask now []) In logs it hangs with this message: debug: Calling fileserver.describe But lots of these fileserver.describe calls prior to hang are successful. If I run it with puppetd

I'm using Ubuntu server 8.10 amd64 with the 3.2.3 samba they provide. I'm using winbind for authentication. Samba is the ONLY service this box is providing for a small office (maybe 15-18 users max). I am using Backup Exec 12.5 ralus but always at night, no active users. My hardware is very overkill for my application (file server for small office, 8gb ram, Intel quad core cpu, raid 10

Hi All, Using Debian stable 2.4.27 with Samba 3.0.24 Currently experiencing a problem where I am trying to back up a mailstore, which is in Maildir format. This has been working fine up until about 2 weeks ago. The mailstore is 88GB in total, which is 150,000+ individual mail files. The drive is 97% full. The server is also running exim-4 and dovecot, which appear to run fine. Below is an

CPU 99.3%: 2170 root 25 0 11656 3228 10m R 99.3 0.5 0:07.42 smbd We're having the same problems as many others with print queues, client lock-ups, etc. I think maybe this CPU problem is related as we have two servers in two locations with the same versions, and both had the problem immediately after upgrading to 3.0.10. We use the YUM facility to upgrade Samba. To react to these