similar to: Concerns about Samba4

Hi, (sorry for my english I'm a telecomunications student from spain) I'm building a PDC with samba from a ldapbackend which was created without samba attributes...it's a very big database...does someone know how can I add the samba attributes to all users..? and what attributes I have to add so that the pdc have the next characteristics: - backend openldap(replica-server,it's

Hello. I'm trying to implement a single-sign-on system with MIT-Kerberos and OpenLDAP. These two are currently working pretty well, but now I'm trying to add samba to this system. I've found a lot of tutorials about samba PDC with LDAP backend, but this is of course not quite what I want. My passwords are stored in the kerberos database and userdata is stored in LDAP. Is there a way to

Hello, I'd like to see if I can get some clarification on what is the preferred method of starting the Samba daemons (note that we are using Solaris, not Linux). This is something that I'm not able to find any explanation of in any of the Samba 3 documentation that I've looked at so far. In Samba 2 I would have the Samba daemons started up by the following in my /etc/inetd.conf:

I was told recently that Kerberos authentication won't work against a non-windows KDC. Is that accurate? So for instance, it is not possible for Samba running on say RHEL, to authenticate against a Linux server running MIT Kerberos? Additionally, many people said that setting this up was well-documented. Any suggestions of particularly good docs / how-to's?' And lastly, is

Hi all, I'm new to Linux and Samba. I have two seperate hard drives, one has w2k and the other Red Hat Linux 7.3. Yessterday I struggeled to make the SWAT work. Then I realized that now I need to learn how to use SWAT. Before I invest time in learning how to use SWAT, my question is if I using w2k, can I access the hard drive that Linux is on and vice versa. Theis question came to my

Hi list, as a result of horrible error logs and no sleep I would be able to throw my smb2.2.4 out of the window and take a phone call to dell for a nt box ... but I'll try once again. I know, this is the wrong list, but maybe here I get more Developers. My simple question is: If my PDC (WinS -> named, system is SuSE 7.3 but newest versions of all relevant software) won't run as smooth

I am trying, after login that samba will go directly to thei users home directory. But it doesn't happen. Please help. Here is my setup: logon home = \\%N\%U [homes] comment = %U's Home Directory valid users = %S read only = Yes browseable = no ## path = %H create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 guest ok = no printable = no

My apologies, I'm terribly sorry to belabor these PDC issues to the point where everyone is undoubtedly tired of hearing about them, but I have become absolutely obsessed with trying to solve this PDC problem. Here is what is happening now. I'm trying to connect to the Samba server which is set up as the PDC (domain PLAB) from windows client "venus". Windows prompts me to

The subject's a little misleading really, but I was looking for some clarification of my thoughts... In Windows, one can use both share permissions and NTFS permissions to control access to files. I would normally use share permissions to control a connection (allow/deny), and use NTFS to control access. I would never use share permissions to control access whilst NTFS was capable of

Dear List, We have just bought: * Dual AMD CPU, 8TB NAS, 4GB RAM (DNUK.COM) - SUSE 9.3 * Two Dell 2850, 3GB RAM, Dual Xeon 3.2GHz, 300GB Raid 5 - Fedora Core 4 Now obviously we want to use the Storage ;-) How would you guys recommend we proceed? Samba PDC on one 2850, LDAP Directory on second, and somehow mount the storage for the shares? Or run the PDC on the NAS, and keep the LDAP

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On Tuesday 02 July 2013 18:22:01 Dave Airlie wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Release because I want the cursor ioctls released, >> also haswell and radeon ids. > > Any chance to get the "[PATCH v6

Hi Thomas, Thank you for the patch. On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:59:57PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > The xlnx driver uses CMA helpers with default callback functions. > Initialize the driver structure with the rsp CMA helper macro. The > driver is being converted to use GEM object functions as part of > this change. > > Two callbacks, .dumb_destroy and .gem_prime_import,

On 21.11.2018 19:19, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Ville, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 18:13:42 EET Ville Syrjala wrote: >> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> >> >> Make life easier for drivers by simply passing the connector >> to drm_hdmi_avi_infoframe_from_display_mode() and >>

On 03.12.2018 22:38, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:08:07AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >> On 21.11.2018 19:19, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> Hi Ville, >>> >>> Thank you for the patch. >>> >>> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 18:13:42 EET Ville Syrjala wrote: >>>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at

On 05.12.2018 07:32, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Ville, > > On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 21:13:20 EET Ville Syrjälä wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 08:46:53AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >>> On 03.12.2018 22:38, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >>>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:08:07AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >>>>> On 21.11.2018 19:19, Laurent Pinchart

Hi Laurent Am 06.03.20 um 15:22 schrieb Laurent Pinchart: > Hi Thomas, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 04:59:28PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >> A call to drm_simple_encoder_init() initializes an encoder without >> further functionality. It only provides the destroy callback to >> cleanup the encoder's state. Only few drivers

Hi Laurent Am 06.03.20 um 15:22 schrieb Laurent Pinchart: > Hi Thomas, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 04:59:28PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >> A call to drm_simple_encoder_init() initializes an encoder without >> further functionality. It only provides the destroy callback to >> cleanup the encoder's state. Only few drivers

Hi Boris, Thank you for the patch. On Thursday 02 Jun 2016 16:31:28 Boris Brezillon wrote: > Adapt drm_pick_crtcs() and update_connector_routing() to fallback to > drm_atomic_helper_best_encoder() if funcs->best_encoder() is NULL so > that DRM drivers can leave this hook unassigned if they know they want > to use drm_atomic_helper_best_encoder(). Could you please update

Hi Boris, Thank you for the patch. On Thursday 02 Jun 2016 16:31:28 Boris Brezillon wrote: > Adapt drm_pick_crtcs() and update_connector_routing() to fallback to > drm_atomic_helper_best_encoder() if funcs->best_encoder() is NULL so > that DRM drivers can leave this hook unassigned if they know they want > to use drm_atomic_helper_best_encoder(). Could you please update

Hi Sam, On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 09:08:13PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 04:18:52PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > Am 06.03.20 um 15:22 schrieb Laurent Pinchart: > > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 04:59:28PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > >> A call to drm_simple_encoder_init() initializes an encoder without > > >> further