similar to: appears to be incompatibility between samba versions

machine A: samba server, upgraded from 3.0.7 to 3.0.22. solaris 9. machine B: samba client, on powermac G4, OS 10.4 (i believe). i think samba is 3.0.10. after the upgrade of the samba server (A), machine B cannot get onto A. it keeps saying the password is wrong. i've tried tons of stuff. the keychain has been reset. the client has been rebooted. the server has had samba restarted.

Hello all, I saw on the Release notes that 2.6.0 is using protocol version 27 which is different than 2.5.7 and 2.5.6. I did a quick peak through the rest of the release notes and quickly browsed the archives on the list and I didn't see any notes on how well 2.6.0 works with older versions of rsync. At our site, we do have 2.5.7 and 2.5.6 installed. Are there any documented problems when

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1987 Bug #: 1987 Summary: FIPS signature verification incompatibility with openssl versions > 0.9.8q Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

Hello - I never heard back on this and continue to experience this bug. Can someone help me to locate the patch for this so that I can be sure it's included in my source? It's not happening on every boot, but about every other or third. And just as described in the bug report (the boot works OK, but at the end rather than GDM starting nicely, I get a "fuzzy" screen and the

All, After many hours of research I have found there is a incompatibility between OpenLDAP V2.3.x and V2.2.x, or atleast between V2.3.27 the current version on CentOS V5 and V2.2.13 the current version on CentOS V4. The syncrepl feature of OpenLDAP, to keep multiple slapd servers sync'd, was working between CentOS 4 and 5 at one time, as that is how I populated the "slave" servers.

Running on a Debian server, 3.0r Sid, 2.4.18 kernel. I recently did an apt-get upgrade which upgraded samba from 3.0.5 to 3.0.6 After this upgrade, access to all shares for all users slowed to a crawl. It was possible to browse the folders, to 3-4 folders deep but then Explorer would freeze on the client.Opening files failed. Copying files locally resulted in corrupt files. Clients included

We use "security = server" in order to achieve centralized password management and seamless windows integration for some of our users. Regardless of the intelligence of doing so, there is a noticable several hundred percent slowdown when we switched from Samba 2.2.x to 3.0.x. I've tried 3.0.8, 3.0.10, 3.0.11, 3.0.22 and 3.0.23rc1 -- they all are much slower for opening files,

Hello all! I didn't see anyone else reply to this, but I also didn't see anything show up on the OpenSSH development list (Cc'ed here). There is a patch call out right now for the pending release of 2.4.0. I'm wondering if anyone is aware of this and if it's already been covered in 2.4.0? Please reply to list and original poster... ----- Forwarded message

[samba v3.0.24, gentoo w/ kernel 2.6.15] I'm hoping someone has some insight into the following problem that I've recently encountered: Basically, winxp seems to be creating roaming profiles that are incompatible with another winxp client. I've got two sets of winxp clients, which I'll call 'new' and 'old'. Profiles created (and perfectly usable) by the old

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1266 Summary: incompatibility between s/key and keys Autentification Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.4p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1987 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Set all RESOLVED bugs to CLOSED with release

Hi, I got this error after a transaction was interrupted by me and a new (slightly updated) transaction was started. ... fedora/1/en/i386/base/pkglist.dag.bz2 1246954 100% 67.79kB/s 0:00:17 (27, 1.7% of 201557) Invalid file index 1777522462 (count=201557) rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at sender.c(152) On both ends exactly the same rsync was used. It's a

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1266 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #8 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org>

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1266 dtucker at zip.com.au changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Comment #7 from dtucker at zip.com.au 2007-01-19 09:49

Hello, I was trying to install Rggobi in the latest version of R and it gave me a compilation error for R CMD INSTALL Rggobi_1.0-0.tar.gz RSGGobi.C: In function RS_GGOBI_init (R_IsNaNorNA) undeclared (line 77) I searched for this function in R src files and it was abandoned in ~/R-2.0.0/src/include/R_ext/Arith.h file. Only functions int R_IsNA(double); /* True for R's NA only */

When I attempt to start shorewall (version 4.0.15) I get an RTNETLINK error (see below). /var/log/shorewall-init.log [...] 21:02:18 Creating Interface Chains... 21:02:19 Adding Providers... RTNETLINK answers: File exists ERROR: Command "ip route add table 1 129.116.XXX.0/24 dev eth2 proto kernel s cope link src 129.116.XXX.30" Failed 21:02:25 Shorewall-generated routing tables and

Any chance we can get the following package built and added to the centos mirrors? $ rpm -qpi librados2-0.94.5-1.el7.x86_64.rpm warning: librados2-0.94.5-1.el7.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 signature: NOKEY, key ID fd431d51 Name????????: librados2????????????????????Relocations: (not relocatable) Version?????: 0.94.5????????????????????????????Vendor: Red Hat, Inc. Release?????:

We are using samba 3 on NetBSD with security=domain authenticating against Windows 2003. We have a username map of "root = administrator". In all previous versions of samba tested (2.2.x and 3.0.x), this means when we log on as administrator, we have root access and see the root share. With 3.0.10, we are continually prompted for a password. Log from 3.0.7 below: [2005/01/06 14:25:58,

Hi I would like to contribute to the wiki.centos.org: username: boel subject: nagios incompatibility with centos 5.2 location: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Nagios content: A security feature of centos 5.2 SELinux prevents the access from the apache httpd server to the needed /var/nagios files. The error manifests itself in the /var/log/messages as "SELinux is preventing the tac.cgi from

Got this strange error: receiving incremental file list rsync: opendir "/.~tmp~" (in <sender-module>) failed: Permission denied (13) IO error encountered -- skipping file deletion rsync: opendir "/path/.~tmp~" (in <sender-module>) failed: Permission denied (13) invalid multi-message 22:4 [sender/inc] *************************************** rsync: connection