similar to: The Samba 3 Network speed too slow

Hi Andrew, thanks for the reply, On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:56:22PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 09:58 +0200, Ervin Hegedüs via samba wrote: > > > > here is a Samba4 AD with LDB. > > > > Is there any limit for number of possible objects? I mean users, computers, > > and other kind of nodes. > > [...] > > May be an ugly

My client is using Samba to read information on their web server from SCO Open Server 5. They are having this problem: Windows holds old information, rather than getting new information from Samba once a file is updated. Is there any way to force samba to go and look for new data everytime Windows makes a request for data? Thanks! -- K-Tag: I've upped my standards. Now up yours! ------

On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 13:40 +0200, Ervin Hegedüs via samba wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > thanks for the reply, > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:56:22PM +1300, Andrew Bartlett wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 09:58 +0200, Ervin Hegedüs via samba wrote: > > > > > > here is a Samba4 AD with LDB. > > > > > > Is there any limit for number of possible

Has anyone had the nvidia driver successfully work for them? I ended up crashing everytime I tried to use X. All I'm interested in is the use of my tv-out on my nvidia card. any input is appreciated -Darren -- An Important Member of http://www.quantumtheorem.com/ =)

Hi list, here is a Samba4 AD with LDB. Is there any limit for number of possible objects? I mean users, computers, and other kind of nodes. On a Samba Wiki page, the doc notes: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LDB#How_LDB_uses_TDB "How LDB uses TDB LDB basically sits on top of TDB and manipulates the data into an LDAP-like structure." And I've found a doc here:

Hi All, I want to setup a machine to connect to internet at a limited rate of 64 kbps. That machine is connected to a switch. so my LAN and Internet both comes from the same eth0. How can I limit only the internet access from this machine to 64kbps and still using 100mbps for LAN I am trying to implement this Please guide me If i am wrong. I mark all the packets going out to LAN. Then I can

HTB performance improvement Hi all ! i''m looking at the performance of the HTB algorithm/implementation because i would like more packets/sec !! this is the scenario of the performance test: i''m using an embedded system with: SPEED CPU: 399,999 MHz RAM: 128 MByte FLASH: 16 MByte EEPROM: 8Kbyte PROCESSOR MPC8272 a lan to lan 10/100 and in particular we are sending

Hi, I''m trying to get HTB working correctly on Centos4 (RHEL-based) with kernel 2.6.9-34.EL. I have two gigabit network interfaces bridged together and I have created the following: tc qdisc add dev eth2 root handle 1: htb default 1 r2q 8000 tc class add dev eth2 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100Mbit burst 24k cburst 24k (I have been trying different parameters). The network is

I''ve just pushed some changes to hg that seem to speed things up a bit for me. On one machine with 2 x dual core 2.4Ghz AMD cpu''s, testing with iperf from DomU to Dom0 I get: Windows (vcpus = 2) - ~500MBits/sec - ~66% cpu utilization (eg 100% on one, and 33% on the second cpu) Linux (vcpus = 1) - ~2200MBits/sec On another machine with 1 x dual core 1.8Ghz AMD cpu, testing as

Hi, We actually have a mail hosting solutions with aprox. 100 thousand of email account, where about 90% of a customers use POP3 like email configuration. About a few mounths (we perfomed a lot of migration throught mbox email software to Maildir with dovecot) but i can see that the performance is very poor and receive complaint about delays of autentications of accounts. The solution

Folks, The projection pursuit regression function in the base R seems to crash when the optimization level is set to zero, i.e. the initial ridge terms are accepted without refitting. I encountered this problem in an out-of-sample prediction exercise using predict. But further investigation suggests the issue is with the ppr fit and predict just sppeds up the crash. The other optlevels seem to be

> Send LARTC mailing list submissions to > lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc > or, via email, send a message with subject or body ''help'' to > lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl > > You can reach the person managing the list at >

Just reporting some iperf results. In each case, Dom0 is iperf server, DomU is iperf client: (1) Dom0: Intel Core2 3.16 GHz, CentOS 5.2, xen 3.0.3. DomU: Windows XP SP3, GPLPV 0.9.12-pre13, file based. Iperf: 1.17 Gbits/sec (2) Dom0: Intel Core2 2.33 GHz, CentOS 5.2, xen 3.0.3. DomU: Windows XP SP3, GPLPV 0.9.12-pre13, file based. Iperf: 725 Mbits/sec (3) Dom0: Intel Core2 2.33 GHz,

Hi there, I would like to know how Samba / Windows determines which domain controller should handle a logon request, and whether there is a way I can affect the process. Here's the situation: I have a school installation running a Samba domain, with a PDC (1.1GHz Celeron, 256 MB RAM) and one BDC (much smaller, 366 with 64 MB RAM), both with RedHat 7.1 and Samba 2.2.5. There are about 80

Hi, I am using tinc 1.0.23 in router mode and am having trouble with intermittent TCP connect timeouts that do not occur when routing the TCP over the internet directly. I am using a pure IPv6 setup (i.e direct IPv6 connections, and tunneled IPv6 subnets). My configs are as follows: Site 1: ----------------------- tinc.conf: Name = rsukmhb AddressFamily = ipv6 BindToAddress =

Thanks for replying so quickly Guus. I will try increasing the re-keying time to 86400, and am now running the servers in debug 5 mode logging to a file, so will get all output. Its interesting what you say about UDP being given lower priority, the two end points of this VPN are actually within the same data center, but are being routed within the DC's core routers (because its going