similar to: In need of samba v3.xx for use with solaris 5.8 not 5.9

I'm having a problem with both the 5.8 and 5.9 kernels using the nouveau DRM driver. I have a laptop with a VGA card (specs below) connected to a 5120x1440 screen. At boot time, the card correctly detects the screen, tries to allocate fbdev fb0, then the video hangs completely for 15-30 seconds until it goes blank. This used to work in Linux 5.7 and earlier, although it allocated a 3840x1080

Anybody know a reliable fax solution for 1.4.30 branch? I am using PikaFax on another server and works very well (about 3000 faxes a week), but it appears they no longer offer their product to open source asterisk, only for there "WARP" appliance. NOT really looking to migrate from 1.4.x to 1.6.x -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

I have found a bug in libvorbis-1.0. I have found a fix, but need to know in what format and to where to sumbit the patch. It involves a quirky qsort in Solaris 5.8 that dumps core without the patch. The fix involves editing vorbis/lib/psy.c <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a

Solaris 5.8 has a quirky qsort that requires the ability to recognize elements as equal. here is a patch I have created to deal w/ this problem. I apologize if the patch is in the wrong format and would love to be corrected if wrong. I used the following to create the patch libvorbis-1.0> diff -u lib/psy.c lib/psy_new.c > libv.patch <p><p><p><p> --------------

Hi, I've had some strange recent behaviour from ssh (OpenSSH_3.9p1 Solaris 5.8). I have an application that runs a script that run a remote command over ssh, however rather than running the command ssh tried to run openwindows (an xsession app, i think). Every time the application ran the command the same issue would occur, until the application was restarted. The command it should have been

Samba 2.0.5a worked great on my earlier Sun Solaris 7 (5.7) Intel version. But with Solaris 8 (5.8), smbstatus reports that root did not create the semaphore; failed initialize share modes . . . . Is there a samba version out there that has been tested on above platform? And if so, where. Thanks much. Cole Ragland Systems Interface Analyst Phone: 619-938-7116 Pager: 877-727-2856 FAX:

Greetings! When compiling R-1.5.0 on Solaris 5.8, I got the following error message (see below). I've been using R-1.4.0 with no difficulties. I renamed the previous R installation to R-1.4.0 (following suggestions of an earlier post by Peter Dalgaard) before compiling R-1.5.0. And I've checked that the enviornment variable R_LIBS is not set. Is there something I overlooked? Any

I get the following linker error when compiling Samba on Solaris Sparc 5.8: bash-2.03# make Using CFLAGS = -I../lib/zlib -O -I. -I/root/samba-3.5.8/source3 -I/root/samba-3.5.8/source3/../lib/popt -I/root/samba-3.5.8/source3/iniparser/src -Iinclude -I./include -I. -I. -I./../lib/replace -I./../lib/tevent -I./libaddns -I./librpc -I./.. -I./../lib/talloc -I../lib/tdb/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 08:00:49PM +0200, Didier Spaier via Syslinux wrote: > > Thanks for your answer Ady. > > However, I cloned the repo and "git branch" only returns: > * master > > How can I find this "syslinux-4.xx" branch or at least spot the commits > in that branch more recent than the 4.07 release? > > A did a bit of RTFM but am not

On 01/06/2016 03:24, Ady via Syslinux wrote:> @Didier, > > There were several potential fixes and improvements that were never > back-ported to the "syslinux-4.xx" branch. The very few commits in that > branch could be added to interested distributions without releasing a > new official version. > > Moreover, there were potential new features / additions that

Asterisk is behind firewall, I'm able to register with the provider. Calls are coming IN OK, but when I try to call out I got: Got SIP response 603 "Declined" back from 81.15.xx.xx -- #Joseph

> On 01/06/2016 03:24, Ady via Syslinux wrote:> @Didier, > > > > There were several potential fixes and improvements that were never > > back-ported to the "syslinux-4.xx" branch. The very few commits in that > > branch could be added to interested distributions without releasing a > > new official version. > > > > Moreover, there were

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1014 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Pablo Neira Ayuso

Hi all, What does 'Got reject for frame...' message really mean, what could be causing it, and how should one start troubleshooting it? Thanks in advance, Alex

> On 01/06/2016 00:28, H. Peter Anvin via Syslinux wrote: > > There seem to be a bunch of bug fixes in the 6.04 branch that people > > really need. Do we know of any current regressions? Otherwise we > > really ought to just push the button... > > I am a user of syslinux 4.0.7 to boot installers on BIOS aka Legacy. > > Knowing that 4.0.7 has been released on

Hi David, We have a general problem using Augeas in libguestfs and I wonder if you have any advice. The problem is that we often -- as with yesterday's patch -- add new config file paths to lenses. Or we want to parse config files which are not necessarily in the exact paths that Augeas is expecting. Now it's easy enough to parse such files using an arbitrary lens by calling

I have a data set where one column consists of two numerical factors, separated by a "-". So my data looks something like this: 43-156 43-43 1267-18 . . . There are additional columns consisting of single factors as well, so reading the csv file (where the data is stored) with the sep="-" addition won't work since the rest of the factors are separated by commas. So first

Hi we have a pretty nasty CPU usage problem running Samba 2.2.2 on Solaris (SunOS infpdb01.atinfopop.com 5.8 Generic_108528-03 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-80) The server was coping OK with the load then 'something changed' and CPU usage has been climbing over the last couple of weeks. I've posted CPU, config files and a sambastatus snapshot below. Other information that may be helpful: -

Op 2013-06-26 om 11:01 schreef syslinux-owner at zytor.com: > As list administrator, your authorization is requested for the > following mailing list posting: > > List: Syslinux at zytor.com > From: ady-sf at hotmail.com > Subject: 6.xx vesamenu and misc issues > Reason: Message body is too big: 1085125 bytes with a limit of 512 KB > > Date:

Is the new Isolinux series effecting hardware in a different way as 2.xx series? I'm getting a system crash in VMware. I guess this is a Vmware issue, but thought you might want to know. 2.xx series works OK for me. I get to see 8 dots when loading a 360KB imagefile, following by crash message mentioned below. Replacing MEMDISK by old version does not matter, only replacing isolinux.bin 3.05