similar to: usrmgr.exe issues

Hi All, What would be interesting would be a plot of complexity versus subjective or object audio quality. I've not had a chance to look at the new analysis code in 1.1 so maybe in the case of a 6kbps compression you could clarify what decisions would it be making that would justify the extra complexity? Best Regards Cliff Parris -----Original Message----- From: opus-request at

Cliff, Yes it would be good, but very hard to get a figure for the quality. At 6kbps I assume it does not bother trying to figure what mode to use as at that rate it can only use SILK. When I run some other bitrates it may get a bit slower trying to decide whether it is voice or music. I started with low bit rate because I am only really interested in Voice and very low bit rate. I think there

I have run a few more test at different bitrates and 1.1 is looking even worse in terms of speed compared to previous versions. I have shared a google sheet which has the raw data and charts for 6,16 and 32 kbps. Unfortunately you cannot show proper error bars on Google sheets but the standard deviation is in the data if you want to look. You can see that the profile for 1.1 is a lot different

It might be good to use the (uncompressed) samples on the opus page, as a common starting point? http://www.opus-codec.org/examples/ On Dec 21, 2013, at 9:43 AMEST, Stuart Marsden wrote: > I have run a few more test at different bitrates and 1.1 is looking even worse in terms of speed compared to previous versions. > > I have shared a google sheet which has the raw data and charts for

Although I've never used ARM's compiler, I admit I'm very surprised that it's not compatible with the NEON intrinsics. Given that and M. Zanelli's speed tests, it seems clear that M. Zanelli's code is the way to go. I look forward to its inclusion in the opus GIT. --John On 6/10/2013 1:00 PM, opus-request at xiph.org wrote: > Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:36:34 +0100

I have to admit that I am impressed by your results -- making 1.1 look slower than 1.0 is by no means an easy task. On the other hand, it's a great tutorial on how not to use Opus, so for the benefit of everyone, this is a summary of what we learned in this exercise: 1) When running on ARM, the fixed-point build is usually faster than floating point. This is true on the majority of ARM archs

Martin Pelmore, Credit Cards For Students Offer Convenience And Safety Credit cards for students are a great deal for many individuals and groups. Parents will find that credit cards provide a convenient way to provide for their children away at school. Credit cards for students eliminate the necessity of students carrying around a lot of cash to pay for their tuition, fees and miscellaneous

We have found that it is possible to achieve a 30 to 50% reduction in MHz requirement for implementation of OPUS on Cortex M4 compared to the public version (v1.3 beta/v1.2.1). For the CELT configuration you mention (complexity 0, 16kHz, mono, 20ms) we are measuring a 4ms encode time and a 3ms decode time for that platform (32kbit/s). An important issue that I haven't seen much discussion

Hello Opus, I?d like to report a bug in the fixed point OPUS code: line 336 (or thereabouts), operand FIND_LPC_COND_FAC should be replaced with SILK_FIX_CONST(FIND_LPC_COND_FAC ,32), otherwise multiplication by zero typically occurs. please confirm. Cliff -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello OPUS, It appears to me that multi-frame packets are not supported by opus_demo.c (e.g. 30ms packest containing 3 10ms frames), can you confirm. However RF6716 does support such packets. Thanks Cliff -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20131121/56bab79a/attachment.htm

Dear R folk: Perhaps I'm just dense today, but I am having trouble reproducing the principal components plotted and summarized by clusplot. Here is a brief example using the pluton dataset. clusplot reports that the first two principal components explain 99.7% of the variability. But this is not what princomp is reporting. I would greatly appreciate any advice. With best regards, -- Tom

Hi, We are running samba 3.0.28 on RHEL 5 as a PDC serving around 1000 active users . This domain was vampired from aWindows NT 4 domain a few years ago. OpenLDAP 2.2.13 is used as the back end user database. One of the problems we have is that usrmgr.exe does not display any groups. I can use usrmgr to create users, delete users and create groups. But I cannot use it to delete groups

Hi everybody, i have discovered following problem. System suse 9.2 pdc samba 3.0.20b ldap. a system user which was in the group Domain Admins ( as secondary group of course ) , cannot be removed from the group, by usrmgr ( in real ldap the user gets deleted ! ) If the user account gets deleted completly and recreated it is shown again in the domain admins group.( which isnt so in ldap ) This

usrmgr.exe now successfully shows: - users and what local and domain groups they are in - domain groups and what domain users are in them - local groups and what local groups, domain groups or domain users are in them. this is managed with three new options: "domain group map" "domain user map" "local group map" which are documented in smb.conf. they make

Hello, All! I have domain network. But user managing via USRMGR.EXE is impossble. When I run USRMGR.EXE I get a window: The tag is invalid. Do you want to select another domain to administer? At this time at Samba's log: [2010/01/11 14:12:07, 1] librpc/ndr/ndr.c:ndr_push_error(493) ndr_push_error(5): Bad char conversion [2010/01/11 14:12:07, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(2381)

Hi, I've now got my Samba 3 domain successfully configured apart from a minor detail. When I use USRMGR to try and add a new user I get "The filename, directory name, or volume label syntax is incorrect". About 10 minutes ago I successfully joined this machine to the domain and tested that the server correct adds all my details to the LDAP server. I'm confused, if you tell

Hi @ll, now i am able to login samba 3 beta pdc, have homes mapped with read and write permission on the home ( this troubled too ) now i tested funktions from usrmgr ( old nt prog for create user and groups ) i can create user on the fly, i can create groups on the fly i can delete groups on the fly add and delete users to groups but if i want to dlete users with delete user script =

Heya all, So I've finally got a machine on this Samba 3 domain. Yey. Its an XP Pro box, so I grabbed the UsrMgr.exe and SrvMgr.exe programs from Microsoft, and hoped to at least use UsrMgr to see lists of users, maybe even as a full User manager, since I can't find a decent one that does all the samba3 stuff. Anyway, I'm on the domain, and I run the UsrMgr.exe program and I get an

Dear list, I have two problems managing groups from Win2kSP2 client using UserManager for domains. My Linux user and groups are stored in OpenLDAP using pam_ldap+nss_ldap from Padl. Due to the fact that the groups using the ou=Group organizationalUnit, I have set in smb.conf the "ldap group suffix = ou=Group" (using ldapsam as passdb backend). So the Linux group and the

Hello, I'm using Samba 3.0.1 with LDAP backend running as a PDC here. When I start up usrmgr.exe from Windows NT, it will read all the users (or computers, for srvmgr.exe) in the domain and report them back correctly. However, whomever I am logged in as ( including gid 512 users) it will not let me see details or change anything. In the logs after trying to view a users details I will get