similar to: protected file list

Hi, I'm trying to figure out how to find users by IP. I'm parsing a firewall log and would like to map internal IPs to users. I noticed "nmblookup -A <ip>" returns interesting results: COMPUTER <00> - M <ACTIVE> DOMAIN <00> - <GROUP> M <ACTIVE> COMPUTER <03> - M <ACTIVE>

Quick question please....A user logs into windowsXP and tries to create a folder/document and the ownership on the new file/folder defaults to nobody:nobody. I have the user set up in samba on the IRIX machine. All other users have no problem. Anyone have any suggestions? Thanks Rachel

Hi We have a problem with the one way trusts between the DEV and PROD domains (Windows 2003). Microsoft told me to use NTLM instead of kerberos. Is there a way to force samba to use NTLM (or NTLMv2) instead of kerberos? Regards Urs

Hi all, if I put max connections = 5 in the homes section, does this mean that only 5 users can login to their home directory simultaneously? [homes] comment = %u's personal share folder browsable = NO read only = NO map archive = YES case sensitive = no sync always = yes hide dot files = no max connections = 5 besides homes, max connections is working, but in homes looks like this is not

I'm trying to learn how to integrate Linux workstations and servers into a Windows 2000 Active Directory network. I've read and followed the Samba HOWTO, especially the parts about Winbind, and I got my Linux workstation authenticating using pam_krb5 and pam_winbind. klist would show I got a TGT after logging in. Domain users could login and pam_mkhomedir would properly setup a new home

I have a strange issue with Brother MFC-5440CN printer. When I print from Linux/CUPS, it prints colours fine. When I print from Windows, using Windows drivers (without Samba), it also prints fine. When I print from Windows through Samba/CUPS (drivers added using cupsaddsmb...), it gives me wrong colours: expected | result -------------------- yellow | blue blue | red red | green

and for everyone else too :) ----------------------- ?????? ?????? ------------------------ ????: Re: [Samba] password server DOMDC1 rejected the password: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE ???: glykos@gmx.net ??????????: ???, ????????? 15, 2007 15:17 ????: "Warren Beldad" <advisory22@gmail.com>

Hello everybody: I beg your help. : ) The windows version is windows 2003, and I share a folder with full = control permission. The folder name is "asdf". And I use the command to = mount below: mount -t smbfs -o = username=3Dadministrator,password=3D"",fmask=3D777,dmask=3D777 = //windows/asdf /mnt/winnt everything is Ok, and I can use any user to do what i want in the =

While working on my existing member file server smb.conf config file I found an entry for "veto files" like the following: veto files = /.bash_logout/.bash_profile/.bash_history/.bashrc/ The "man smb.conf" entry says: veto files (S) This is a list of files and directories that are neither visible nor accessible. Each entry in the list must be

Hi, I'm presently testing to upgrade from 3.0.22 to 3.0.25 and have an ads problem. net -d 10 -s /etc/samba/smb.conf ads join 3.0.25: ======= [2007/07/18 12:03:11, 4] libsmb/namequery_dc.c:ads_dc_name(131) ads_dc_name: using server='ADS-2K3.ADS2K3.Q-LEAP.DE' IP=192.168.53.212 [...] [2007/07/18 12:03:11, 3] libads/ldap.c:ads_connect(394) Connected to LDAP server 192.168.53.212

Hi, a totally simple, but maybe totally useless question: is there some (small) possibility to theoretically turn off the dns and service resolution provided by samba/netbios and use zeroconf/dns-sd instead? I know it won't be much help for windows users, because they won't find the shares anymore, but maybe there'll be a zeroconf implementation on windows someday? greetings fabian

hi all. recectly i made the migration from samba 2.2.8 to 3.0. everything is working fine, except that i dont know how to grant administrator privileges in win 2000 clients. with 2.2.8, i used DOMAIN ADMIN GROUP parameter ( domain admin group = @adm) but its been removed in samba 3.0, and i dont know what to do. any help will be apreciated thanks in advance sebastian ------------ Internet GRATIS

Hi all, I've finally almost gotten my desired Samba+AD integration working: I've joined a domain, AD users can login, kerberos works (keytab integration, caching, etc.), etc. However, this is only true as long as I hack my /etc/hosts and /etc/samba/lmhosts files to trick Samba into always using my networks Windows 2000 Active Directory Server. The second a Samba command finds and

Can someone explain what's required to join a linux computer to the windows domain and what the benefits would be? Rick B.

Hi, I am testing share parameters, and have the following share definition: ## Section - [shareA] [shareA] path = /tmp/shareA writelist = user1 and do not understand why user1 cannot write files in the share when connected as user1. Unix permissions for the share files are rw for everyone, and the share directory has wide-open permissions. Samba version is 3.0.20b-3.4-SUSE.

Hi Warren, You have the -m32 flag set, but it's still giving you this: > Warning: Generation of 64-bit code for a 32-bit processor requested. > Warning: 64-bit processors all have at least SSE2. But are you sure you want to compile the LLVM-GCC source? You should use the binaries unless absolutely necessary. -bw On May 24, 2007, at 10:34 PM, Warren Armstrong wrote: > Hi all,

Hi all, I've run into problems compiling the llvm-gcc frontend on x86_64. Is this not supported, or am I making an error somewhere? The procedure I followed was: 1. Download LLVM 2.0 source as a tarball (from a few days ago, during the testing phase). 2. Download the llvm-gcc4 source today, as a tarball. 3. Extract both. 4. Configure LLVM as: ../src/configure --prefix=`pwd`../install

Hi Warren, you can try to configure with the following export CFLAGS="-m64" export LDFLAGS="-L/usr/lib64" LLVM: ../src/configure --prefix=`pwd`../install --enable-optimized --enable-jit --enable-targets=host-only make LLVM-GCC: ../llvm-gcc4-2.0.source/configure --prefix=`pwd`../install --program-prefix=llvm- --enable-llvm=/home/warren/llvm/obj/ --enable-languages=c,c++

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > Much of the evil on the Internet today ? DDoS armies, spam spewers, phishing botnets ? is done on pnwed hardware, much of which was compromised by previous botnets banging on weak SSH passwords. > > Your freedom to use any password you like stops at the point where exercising that freedom creates a risk

> On Nov 17, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 17, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: >> >> On the plus side, I'm glad to see the conclusions of the last couple of posts. >> >> From Mehdi: >> >>> Hope this clarify where I see the