Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "Windows XP Pro can not join Samba 3 on RHLE4"
2006 Oct 27
2
Telnet and SSH login problems with Red Hat Enterprise ES4
Hello
We have successfully set up Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES4 and we are now
trying to connect remote clients to connect to it.
The problems we are having are as follows:
a) If we set connect with telnet, we get the login prompt. If we
use any valid login name & password combination (including root), we get
the response "Login incorrect" and then the login prompt comes back.
How
2019 Dec 16
0
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
I am staring constantly at the same logs, this is what I get from
dovecot[1]. Sendmail[2] is sending with test at svr1 maybe this overrides
lmtp proxying? This is a test with a special-userdb passwd-file also
having host=svr2
[1]
Dec 16 16:30:16 svr1 dovecot: lmtp(16466): Debug: none: root=, index=,
indexpvt=, control=, inbox=, alt=
Dec 16 16:30:16 svr1 dovecot: lmtp(16466): Connect from
2019 Dec 17
1
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
Hi Aki, you have some ingenious remark that could help?
-----Original Message-----
To: aki.tuomi; dovecot
Subject: RE: Local lmtp proxy on backend server
I am staring constantly at the same logs, this is what I get from
dovecot[1]. Sendmail[2] is sending with test at svr1 maybe this overrides
lmtp proxying? This is a test with a special-userdb passwd-file also
having host=svr2
[1]
Dec
2004 Mar 08
1
drawing filled countries according to data using map('world')? - follow up
Hello,
this is a follow up on my previous inquiry regarding the use of the map
library (Becker and Wilks 1993).
Using the 'world' database I would like to draw filled countries in a world
map so that the filling colors of each country corresponds to the value of a
policy variable "fix.float" at a specific "year" (the goal is to visualize a
policy diffusion pattern
2019 Dec 16
0
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
Hi Aki,
I also tried with changing the original ldap source to svr2. Although
everywhere svr2 is configured, still mails keep being delivered locally
on svr1. Do I need to configure more than 20-lmtp.conf?
[@svr1 conf.d]# cat 20-lmtp.conf | grep -v '^#'
lmtp_proxy = yes
protocol lmtp {
# Space separated list of plugins to load (default is global
mail_plugins).
mail_plugins
2019 Dec 16
1
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
I added this:
passdb {
driver = passwd
skip = authenticated
}
Which enables indeed local delivery, I also noticed this. Maybe the
password field check shoud not be done, when you enable skip
authentication?
Dec 16 10:26:37 svr1 dovecot: auth-worker(12046): Debug: passwd(test):
lookup
Dec 16 10:26:37 svr1 dovecot: auth-worker(12046): passwd(test): invalid
password field '*'
2019 Dec 15
3
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
I receive a local mail when I do a 'mail test' on a backend svr1 with
this[0] configuration. However when I just add only one configuration
change 'lmtp_proxy = yes' I am getting these errors[1]. I would expect
this email to still be delivered locally, should this be working or do I
misunderstand the lmtp proxy functionality?
[0]
passdb {
args =
auth_verbose = default
2019 Dec 16
0
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
On 15/12/2019 23:09 Marc Roos <
<a href="mailto:m.roos@f1-outsourcing.eu">m.roos@f1-outsourcing.eu</a>> wrote:
</div>
<div>
2003 Jun 08
2
sub-directory 'hung' ...
'K, not sure how/what to debug here ...
doing a grep of svr1.postgresql.org in /proc/*/status shows all the
processes 'stuck' in inode ...
/proc/38750/status:inetd 38750 2072 2072 2072 -1,-1 noflags 1055120147,191009 0,0 0,592 inode 0 0 0,0,0,2,3,4,5,20,31 svr1.postgresql.org
/proc/38752/status:inetd 38752 2072 2072 2072 -1,-1 noflags 1055120154,886433 0,0 0,637 inode 0 0
2012 Apr 20
1
Upgrading from V3.0 production system to V3.3
Before I undertake this upgrade I thought I would see if anyone has any advice
on how to do this on a production system. Maybe someone has already "fought
this dragon".
Current config Gluster V3.0.0. This has been in production for over 16 months:
2 servers with 8 x 2TB hard drives (bricks) replicated
svr1:vol1 <-> srv2:vol1 -> rbrick1
svr1:vol2 <-> srv2:vol2 ->
2019 Mar 12
0
Sometimes can't establish tinc connection due to authentication timeout?
Mar 11 11:24:52 box1 tincd: Trying to connect to svr1 (a.a.a.a port 443)
Mar 11 11:24:52 box1 tincd: Connected to svr1 (a.a.a.a port 443)
Mar 11 11:25:02 box1 tincd: Timeout from svr1 (a.a.a.a port 443) during authentication
Mar 11 11:25:02 box1 tincd: Closing connection with svr1 (a.a.a.a port 443)
Mar 11 11:25:02 box1 tincd: Could not set up a meta connection to svr1
the log as above, I did a
2020 Jan 19
0
Port used for meta-connection and data transfer
Hi,
I see there’re two configuration in tinc:
In main configuration:
BindToAddress = <address> [<port>]
In host configuration:
Port = <port>
So, let’s say on svr1
/etc/tinc/test/tinc.conf:
BindToAddress = ip_addr p1
BindToAddress = ip_addr p2
/etc/tinc/test/hosts/svr1:
Port = p1
On the client side c1
/etc/tinc/test/tinc.conf:
ConnectTo = svr1
/etc/tinc/test/hosts/svr1:
2019 Dec 16
5
Local lmtp proxy on backend server
Hi Aki,
If I adapt this configuration on svr1 like this[0], should the mail not
be delivered at svr2
passdb {
driver = pam
# [session=yes] [setcred=yes] [failure_show_msg=yes]
[max_requests=<n>]
# [cache_key=<key>] [<service name>]
#args = dovecot
default_fields = proxy=y host=svr2
}
passdb {
driver = passwd
skip = authenticated
default_fields = proxy=y
2005 Oct 17
1
Redhat 9 Samba + LDAP PDC ./smbldap-populate issue
Hello Guys,
I have configured samba & ldap as a domain controller before, but never on a
redhat 9 system. I have updated samba & ldap as far as i can tell to the
latest.
Firstly I have a smaller issue (I think) I get this error when trying to
restart ldap, as usual I have followed the samba howto; however it's not the
documentation that is the problem more so an unusal problem or
2019 Nov 24
0
Lmtp proxy help assertion failed: (conn->remote_port != 0
I have this in my 20-lmtp.conf file and created passdb-file, this should
be enough to route a message to svr1? The port 24 is reachable from the
proxy.
bash-5.0# cat 20-lmtp.conf
lmtp_proxy = yes
protocol lmtp {
# Space separated list of plugins to load (default is global
mail_plugins).
passdb {
driver = passwd-file
args = /etc/dovecot/special-passdb
default_fields = proxy=y
2018 Oct 03
2
Non-matching linkedid on CDR Records [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Hi asterisk-users,
We have recently moved to the 13.x branch of Asterisk from 11.x, and we're trying to correlate CDR records from multiple-legs for billing purposes.
As part of this change we have added 'linkedid' to our CDR table schema in an attempt to join the multiple records into one billable record.
The call path can be simplified as (transport types in brackets):
SIP
2010 Apr 12
1
Flood of REGISTERs - attack?
I'm currently receiving over 200 SIP REGISTER requests per second from a
machine apparently in Italy, host97-239-149-62.serverdedicati.aruba.it.
This has continued for several days, and abuse at staff.aruba.it are
unresponsive. I've had a couple of similar incidents recently, the
others originating from uk2.net.
I have an ADSL connection and responding to these REGISTERS was
consuming all
2016 Jun 12
1
scp via another server
> On Jun 12, 2016, at 11:21 AM, J Martin Rushton <martinrushton56 at btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> $ scp svr2:/path/to/source svr1:/path/to/dest
>
> You'll get twice the network traffic since the copy is running on your
> workstattoin (or whatever).
You probably meant:
$ scp -3 svr2:/path/to/source svr1:/path/to/dest
--
Jonathan Billings <billings at
2018 Oct 08
3
Non-matching linkedid on CDR Records [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Hi all,
Just thought I'd update this thread in case anyone else is Googling trying to find out how to do this...
I found the solution to my problem to be to use the IAXVAR() function to pass the accountcode between the Asterisk boxen and update the CHANNEL(accountcode) with that variable.
Thanks to Richard @ Digium for the reply that clarified my misunderstanding.
Calum
On Wed, 2018-10-03
2016 Jun 12
0
scp via another server
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 12/06/16 18:07, H wrote:
> On 06/12/2016 05:21 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: $ scp
> svr2:/path/to/source svr1:/path/to/dest
>
> You'll get twice the network traffic since the copy is running on
> your workstation (or whatever).
>
> On 12/06/16 15:40, H wrote:
>>>> I normally use ssh to log into a remote server,