similar to: smb.conf ignores "ldap user suffix"

I would like a route that strips of the suffix of a url before determining the action. Eg: http://mydomain.com/my_controller/my_action.pdf Would map to: { :controller => ''my_controller'', :action => ''my_action'' } Is this possible? Thanks, -Jonathan.

I wanted the distance_of_time_in_words_to_now method to have '' ago'' suffixed to it when the date is in the past, I assumed this would be the default behaviour but apparently not. I know of a REALLY messy way that i could solve this with, but it''s so ugly I can''t be bothered Does anybody have an easy, elegant solution?

wine-users-bounces@winehq.org wrote on 03/12/2007 01:02:00 PM: > > > There must be a way of compiling without -fPIC. I have a hardened system > > here (linuxfromscratch) and that provides gcc -fno-pic as a compile > > option, so that's worth a try. > > > > This error seems similar to yours. > > gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2006-06/msg00121.html Thanks Declan.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Just recently we installed ssh2 here to avoid problems in ssh-1.2.27. To keep backwards compatibility we installed openssh-1.2.1pre24. Unfortunately, the --program-suffix option for the configure script doesn't seem to work. In particular, i was trying to do './configure --prefix=/usr/local --program-suffix=1'. The programs did not compile with

There's a discussion of this from last month here: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-November/096287.html and here: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2004-November/096342.html read through the threads and you'll find your answers. HTH Geoff

I am trying to run: rsync --dry-run -avz --force --no-whole-file -e "ssh -C" --delete --bwlimit=35 \ --backup --exclude "*.backup-*" --exclude "*:*" '--suffix'=.backup-`date +%m%d` \ /mnt/unite-c/ heraudet@nanardon.zarb.org:~/unite-c/ But I get: rsync: on remote machine: --suffix-dels=.backup-0206: unknown option rsync error: syntax or

Hello, > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Michael Gasch [mailto:gasch@eva.mpg.de] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. Juli 2006 12:19 > > what about using ACLs to restrict uid-searches in the base > for samba admin? Thanks. Just to see if I got your point correctly, you mean to disallow searches involving the uid attribute in the base context for the Samba admin proxy DN, and

--- configure.ac | 9 +++++++++ python/Makefile.am | 2 +- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index ea403c3..00ef507 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -1163,6 +1163,14 @@ AS_IF([test "x$enable_python" != "xno"],[ AC_MSG_RESULT([$PYTHON_INSTALLDIR]) fi +

Some additional info: I just found the .s files mentioned in the error message, and checked them. All error messages refer to one of the following four instructions: pushl %ebp pushl %esi popl %ebp popl %esi It's always the same error, "suffix or operands invalid for `push'" (resp `pop'). There are no other push or pop instructions in any .s file.

> > cd test > make > has > Target is i686-pc-none > Host is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > which means it knows that it is running on amd64 (host = x86_64) and > deals with compilers emitting code for 32 bit (target = i686). > > I suspect it should pass on the target=i686 option to `as' and `ld', > but > doesn't. Aaah. Try: .../configure

Joachim Durchholz wrote: > Since llvm cannot generate code for amd64 at this time, this translates > to an additional constraint on --target, restricting me to --target=i686 > only. llvm can generate code for amd64, but shared libs don't work, and bootstrapping doesn't work (PR1711). Still, if you want to compile it as 32-bit, does it work if you run configure like this (without

Am Mittwoch, den 05.03.2008, 23:03 -0800 schrieb Chris Lattner: > On Mar 3, 2008, at 2:49 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I found enough to explain the behaviour that I encountered. If I'm > > correct, the bugs are just in the dejagnu-based test machinery, not in > > LLVM itself. > > Yep, I believe that. I haven't been

> And that is why I think you should just consider "bt $x,y" to be > trivially the same thing and not at all ambiguous. Because there is > ABSOLUTELY ZERO ambiguity when people write > > bt $63, mem > > Zero. Nada. None. The semantics are *exactly* the same for btl and btq > in this case, so why would you want the user to specify one or the > other? I

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon at gmail.com> wrote: > > I was trying to show a reduced case where gas doesn't complain, but > llvm-mc does. Try compiling this with llvm-mc, and you'll get: Ok. So your commit message and explanation was pure and utter tripe, and the real reason you want this is that llvm-mc is broken. Please fix llvm-mc

I think best would be to just find some way to implement LOCK prefix patching using atomic compiler intrinsics and then switch to those Then all this inline assembler horror could be ifdef'ed away for old compilers only, and likely the generated code would be better as the compiler could optimize more. Or just give up on LOCK patching, as single CPU systems and VMs are less and less

Hello, Core question: How do I tell files with a given suffix to open an .exe app on the Mac so they'll run it via Darwine? I just successfully installed Darwine and then made a desktop alias to the Avaya Voice Mail Player by showing all hidden files in the Finder, using Make Alias, and copying that alias to the desktop. This Avaya windows app plays .lvp audio voicemail files. How can I

Dear Asterisk experts and users. Let's assume I purchased the call number, let it be 2200 for simplicity. So when we call 2200, our call will be processed with Asterisk, and come in, say, [incoming] context. Well, then I'd like Asterisk to process all calls that a *begin* with 2200, i.e. 2200101. My dialplan would include something like: ;; extensions.conf [incoming] exten =>

My apologies if this is off-topic... On a centos6.4 system I installed 389 server from EPEL. It seems to work well enough. However I'm trying to script things, rather than do it via the GUI. So, for example, I want to add a new suffix: #!/bin/ksh -p pswd=$(cat ~/passwd) add() { echo "dn: cn=example,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config changetype: add objectclass:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, ~ I just tried SWAT that comes with Samba 3.0.0, it keeps appending the ldap suffix to the user,group and computer suffix and thus corrupting my smb.conf - -- Taymour A El Erian System Division Manager CNA, MCSE, CCNA, LPIC T.E. Data E-mail: taymour.elerian@tedata.net Web: www.tedata.net Tel: +(202)-4166600 Ext: 1101 -----BEGIN

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Did ldap machine suffix ever get fixed so that it can be in a sperate container from ldap user suffix? Jim C. - -- - ----------------------------------------------------------------- | I can be reached on the following Instant Messenger services: | |---------------------------------------------------------------| | MSN: j_c_llings @ hotmail.com AIM: