Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "samba breaks during user authentication after it was updated"
2006 Sep 27
2
Samba 3.0.23c panic
Hi,
I've just updated (using yum under fedora 5) to the latest version of
samba and am now encountering a major problem with samba. Whenever I
attempt to access shares (don't have printers or other such non disk
shares) the access fails (after prompting for password, and performing
some level of authentication, it notes if no password is entered that
Anonymous login successful).
2006 Oct 03
2
Samba 3.0.23c-1.fc5 problem - groups
Hi there,
I use FC5.
I discovered, for an exemple, if you have a user group with 3 members (Alan,
Baker, Clive), before 3.0.23c this line at smb.conf worked fine:
valid users = @user
But with 3.0.23c update it doesn't work anymore.
You have to replace the line like this:
valid users = Alan, Baker, Clive
I mean, replace the "@groupname" with the complete userlist of the
2006 Oct 03
0
Problem with groups - Samba panic - update 3.0.23c-1.fc5
Hi there,
I?m using FC5 and since I updated to Samba 3.0.23c-1.fc5 I?m not able to
access some shares from the workstations.
Lookin at the log, i found this error:
[2006/09/29 19:34:27, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41)
===============================================================
[2006/09/29 19:34:27, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(42)
INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 3646
2007 Jul 12
3
groups seems broken in samba-3.0.24-7.fc5
I've recently rebuilt a samba server and noticed this problem keeps coming
up with groups. If I use a user in smb.conf
valid users = me
It works and I'm able to access the shared drive. There are no messages in
the log file.
However if I use group
valid users = @admin
I can't access the drive and I get a lot of errors in my messages file. Here is
some of the errors.
2006 Nov 27
1
Problem with Samba 3.0.23c-d
Hello list !
Today i ran yum update on my corporate server thta runs fedoara core 5.
All went well but i stumbled on the samba update...
My network setup is as follows..
I have a small office network, no domain controller and such.
The setup uses user authentication, and all shares are devided into
departments, each defined group is a department, the groups cannot
access/browse eachothers
2006 Nov 01
1
Re: Samba 3.0.23c + Win2K AD, can't mount shares (PANIC: internal error)
Hi,
I can't answer in a way it appears in the thread, sorry ...
Examining the backtrace and these innermost frames:
#0 smbd(log_stack_trace+0x1c) [0x5555557586cc]
#1 smbd(smb_panic+0x43) [0x5555557587b3]
#2 smbd [0x555555746b82]
#3 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 [0x2aaaac259de0]
#4 /lib64/libc.so.6(strlen+0x30) [0x2aaaad3c9510]
#5 /lib64/libc.so.6(__strdup+0x16) [0x2aaaad3c9246]
2007 Mar 22
1
Valid Users setting causing crash
Hey list,
Having a strange issue on a new File server. This system is running the
64-bit version of Fedora 5 running kernel 2.6.20-1.2300.fc5 and version
3.0.24-1.fc5 of Samba.
This system is functioning as a backup to a primary system that is
configured the same way. Same OS, hardware, etc. After moving data over
and setting up the users and groups, I moved over the smb.conf file as
well. In
2007 Aug 26
1
RE: migrating samba to new hardware and different OS
Hi All
I have done as much as I can to try and figure out what is going wrong
with my samba migration by googleing and reading mailing list archives
and reading documentation etc.
I have an existing SAMBA 3.0.5 domain running on suse linux 9.3.
I am trying to migrate this setup to a new server which is running
Fedora Core 6
smbd 3.0.24-7.fc6
I have migrated the data across to the new system
2012 Oct 07
2
Reshape2, melt, order of categorical variable and ggplot2
Hello everyone,
I have the following data frame:
> df
V1 V2 V3
1 bench1_10 16675 16678
2 bench1_10 16585 16672
3 bench1_100 183924 185563
4 bench1_100 169310 184806
5 bench1_300 514430 516834
6 bench1_300 510743 514062
7 bench1_500 880146 877882
8 bench1_500 880146 857359
9 bench1_1k 880146 1589600
10 bench1_1k 880146 1709990
>
I'd like to
2006 Oct 31
0
Subject: Samba 3.0.23c + Win2K AD, can't mount shares (PANIC: internal error)
Hi,
I've got a big problem since my new samba servers are in 3.0.23c
version, no problems before.
The server is only a file server and domain member in a Win2K Active
Directory domain (4 replicated DC, 1 domain, no forest).
My problem:
Anytime I try to connect a share through any kind of client (MacOS
cifs client, smbclient, windows win2K pro, ...) the client can't
mount the
2006 Nov 01
1
Samba 3.0.23c + Win2K AD, can't mount shares (PANIC: internal error)
Hi,
I've got a big problem since my new samba servers are in 3.0.23c
version, no problems before.
The server is only a file server and domain member in a Win2K Active
Directory domain (4 replicated DC, 1 domain, no forest).
My problem:
Anytime I try to connect a share through any kind of client (MacOS
cifs client, smbclient, windows win2K pro, ...) the client can't
mount the
2008 Jul 11
3
[Bug 16675] New: Request for working fan speed adjustment on NV40
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16675
Summary: Request for working fan speed adjustment on NV40
Product: xorg
Version: git
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: medium
Component: Driver/nouveau
AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
2000 Feb 18
0
compiling in NIS+ support error
I would like t compile NIS+ support into SAMBA, but I am getthing an
error. I am doing this:
./configure --with-nisplus
and when I run make, I get these errors:
Linking bin/smbd
passdb/nispass.o: In function `make_sam_from_nisresult':
passdb/nispass.o(.text+0x84f): undefined reference to `nis_sperrno'
passdb/nispass.o: In function `nisp_get_nis_list':
2009 Apr 20
2
Getting mad with group permissions
I have a file server with two shares accessible to 2 different groups.
After the last update ( from debian 2:3.2.5-4 to 2:3.3.2-1 ) i cannot
any more access ONLY ONE of the two shares and I can't understand the
reason!
Can anyone hel me? I'm getting mad!
Thanks
Giorgio
from smb.conf:
[documenti_movi]
path = /home/documenti_movi
valid users = @staffmovi
read
2010 Sep 29
4
Problem when "valid users" is used
Hi,
When I use "valid users" in smb.conf to limit access on my share, I have
this message with smbclient :
[global]
workgroup = MYDOM
domain master = no
local master = no
security = user
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://x.x.x.x:389
ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=company,dc=com
ldap suffix = dc=company,dc=com
ldap user
2014 Jul 31
0
Access denied when accessing via hostname
Hi
I'm using Samba 3.6.3 on ubuntu 12.04 as a domain member with AD on Win
Server 2012.
My hare is configured like this:
valid users = @"EVSOFFICE.LOCAL+dangroup"
When I try to connect to a share via IP from Win7 (part of the domain) it
succeeds but when use host name \\node15 I can see shares but double-click
on share shows AccessDenied.
I'm trying to connect as
2011 Mar 28
2
winbind is not taking default domain
Hi,
We have been running samba file server about 2 years without this problem. The problem appeared at the same time on our debian and centos servers. Not sure if it's related to any updates on our windows AD servers.
Debian Squeeze
sernet-samba-3.5.8-27
Centos 5.5
samba3-3.5.5-43.el5
Use Active Directory for user login authentication
Use uid/gid from ldap
The reason we still want winbind
2010 Aug 19
0
AD Groups Failing to Authorize in Valid Users (does not start with S-)
For the last 3 weeks I've been working on getting RHEL4 (and 5, but
that's a different story) to play well with Active Directory, OpenLDAP,
Kerberos, PAM and NSS.
It's been a long struggle but I now have a process to authenticate and
authorize a RHEL4 client to a windows Active Directory server to that my
AD Users can log into my Linux boxes (assuming their group permissions
are set
2010 Jun 12
2
Problems with ldap groups in share folders ACCESS_DENIED
Hi I have been working all week with samba 3.4.7 in Centos 5.5
PDC(3.4.7) with LDAP backend+Centos 5.5(3.4.7) BDC with LDAP slave.
I already have 5 clients join.
1 Windows XP
1 Windows 7 UE
1 Centos 5.5 Desktop
1 Ubuntu 9.x
1 Centos 5.5
I can browse inside windows and see my clients, access some shares. I
want to create private shares inside my PDC, I use:
force group
valid users
write list
2007 Dec 12
2
Vista SP1-rc1 appears to break against Samba-3.0.27a
We've got nicely ADS integrated Samba-3.0.27a servers that are working
fine with Win2000 through to standard Vista.
However, we are starting to test RC1 of Vista SP1 and discovered that
once applied, that workstation cannot connect to Samba server shares -
unless the share is open - i.e. no "valid user" style settings. The
moment one is defined, Vista fails to connect and pops up an