similar to: can't access Samba share when clocks skew is too great

I've upgraded my pdc to 2000 (compatibility mode with nt), and I want the linux server to communicate directly with ADS... I've changed my smb.conf, and try net ads join -UAdministrator But I get the following error : borealis:/var/lib/samba# net ads join -UAdministrator Administrator's password: [2005/03/15 15:47:20, 0] libads/ldap.c:ads_add_machine_acct(1368)

Hi all, I seem to be having a problem identical to this bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3940 in Samba 3.0.28, however the bug is supposed to be fixed by now. I have a Fedora 7 box joined as a member to Windows 2003 domain. All my Windows users have accounts on the Samba machine, with the same user name in Windows and in Unix. I have a share with valid users = +group, where

Hi, I believe the following patch in the GIT - 2.6.17-rc5 is not correct: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=75616cf9854b83eb83a968b1338ae0ee11c9673c It is the second of the two patches contributed by Leonid Ananiev. This one incorrectly adds the super block unlocking in the error path, though. As we can see in the function ext3_group_add() the

I recently upgraded from samba 3.0.10-1.fc3 to 3.0.21b-2 running on FC5. Today was the first day of a typing class which uses the network version of Mavis Beacon Typing which depends on file sharing. The users are hanging and then getting an error message during logging into the product. In /var/log/message, I can see the following message for each user similar to: [2006/04/24

Is it possible to disable the unbond resolver in the asterisk configuration? Or, it is necessary just to disable the module? Best regards, Leonid Fainshtein On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:29 PM Joshua C. Colp <jcolp at sangoma.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 9:24 AM Leonid Fainshtein < > leonid.fainshtein at xorcom.com> wrote: > >> I deleted the

I deleted the res_resolver_unbound.so module, and now it works as expected. So, the problem is related to the 'unbound' resolver? FYI: I'm using Asterisk 16.2 installed from Debian 10 repository. Best regards, Leonid Fainshtein On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:01 PM Joshua C. Colp <jcolp at sangoma.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 8:58 AM Leonid Fainshtein < >

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:04:45PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:58:22PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > > On 01/13/2016 12:48 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > >On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:02:35AM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > > > > > >>I ask HW team about it but I have a question - has it any relationship with > >

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:04:45PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:58:22PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > > On 01/13/2016 12:48 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > >On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:02:35AM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > > > > > >>I ask HW team about it but I have a question - has it any relationship with > >

On 01/13/2016 02:45 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:45:14PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: >> > I don't think the address dependency is enough on its own. By that > reasoning, the following variant (WRC+addr+addr) would work too: > > > P0: > Wx = 1 > > P1: > Rx == 1 > <address dep> > Wy = 1 > > P2: > Ry == 1 >

On 01/13/2016 02:45 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:45:14PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: >> > I don't think the address dependency is enough on its own. By that > reasoning, the following variant (WRC+addr+addr) would work too: > > > P0: > Wx = 1 > > P1: > Rx == 1 > <address dep> > Wy = 1 > > P2: > Ry == 1 >

On 01/13/2016 12:48 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:02:35AM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > >> I ask HW team about it but I have a question - has it any relationship with >> replacing MIPS SYNC with lightweight SYNCs (SYNC_WMB etc)? > Of course. If you cannot explain the semantics of the primitives you > introduce, how can we judge the patch. >

On 01/13/2016 12:48 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:02:35AM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > >> I ask HW team about it but I have a question - has it any relationship with >> replacing MIPS SYNC with lightweight SYNCs (SYNC_WMB etc)? > Of course. If you cannot explain the semantics of the primitives you > introduce, how can we judge the patch. >

Hi Experts , I have a situation where I have to demonstrate that if the time difference between Samba4 (AD) and Windows Client is more that 5 Min ( as per Kerbrose ) , the user should note be allowed to login via that windows PC . When I simulate it I get Clock skew in the logs ( as shown below ) but the user is allowed to login . / Kerberos: Too large time skew, client time

On 01/14/2016 04:47 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 03:33:40PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: >> Don't be fooled here by words "ordered" and "completed" - it is HW >> design items and actually written poorly. >> Just assume that SYNC_MB is absolutely the same as SYNC for any CPU >> and coherent device (besides performance).

On 01/14/2016 04:47 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 03:33:40PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: >> Don't be fooled here by words "ordered" and "completed" - it is HW >> design items and actually written poorly. >> Just assume that SYNC_MB is absolutely the same as SYNC for any CPU >> and coherent device (besides performance).

Hi, I'm having a problem with significant clock skew on fedora29 with qemu-system-x86-3.0.0 and ibvirt-daemon-kvm-4.7.0. This is on my desktop and appears to happen between suspends of the host each night. It appears like the time just stops while the guest is suspended, of course, but then doesn't update once the guest is resumed. I'm pretty sure time is configured correctly on the

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:46:43PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > On 01/14/2016 12:15 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:42:02AM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > >>An the only point - please use an appropriate SYNC_* barriers instead of > >>heavy bold hammer. That stuff was design explicitly to support the > >>requirements of

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:46:43PM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > On 01/14/2016 12:15 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:42:02AM -0800, Leonid Yegoshin wrote: > >>An the only point - please use an appropriate SYNC_* barriers instead of > >>heavy bold hammer. That stuff was design explicitly to support the > >>requirements of

Hi, I just made a fresh install on a new box and at the end I got this message: make: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build may be incomplete. I had all the various libs added to a default install of RH 9. Though its possible that I'm short on developer tools. Any clues anyone? -- Steve ______________________________________ This sig is pending approval

On 01/10/2016 06:18 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On mips dma_rmb, dma_wmb, smp_store_mb, read_barrier_depends, > smp_read_barrier_depends, smp_store_release and smp_load_acquire match > the asm-generic variants exactly. Drop the local definitions and pull in > asm-generic/barrier.h instead. > This statement doesn't fit MIPS barriers variations. Moreover, there is a reason