similar to: SELinux

I have the winbind login working on FC5 but now logins to local accounts cannot authenticate. My config files are here: http://www.pigeonnier.org/nsswitch.conf http://www.pigeonnier.org/pam.d/ http://www.pigeonnier.org/krb.conf Again, if I try to ssh in as a user that exists only as a local account on the remote host, I am rejected. User msh is -not- a AD account and only exists on the FC5

On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 05:35:06PM -0400, Matt Herzog wrote: > Hello again. > > I'm hoping there is some way I can restrict ssh login through the AD to my > Linux servers. I only have one group of users on the domain that needs ssh access. > > So far I see lots of ways to add or map or join Linux to Windows groups but > I would rather be able to say: "Permission

Hi, I used to have a working Samba + Winbind configuration in ADS mode under FC4; Samba version was 3.0.14a-2. I joined a W2k domain, and winbind correctly returned the user information. krb5.conf and smb.cong have been modified according to Howtos and tutorials found on the net. One day Samba has been updated to 3.0.23a-1.fc4.1 and it stopped working. No modification has been done to the

Thanks to Anthony Ciarochi at Centeris for this solution. I have a Centos (Red Hat-based) server that is now accessible to AD users AND local users via ssh. I can control which AD groups can login using the syntax below. Red Hat-based distros use "pam_stack" in pam.d which is quite different than Debian's "include" based pam.d, cat /etc/pam.d/sshd #

On a client running FC5 with all packages updated from yum (running samba 3.0.23a-1.fc5.1 and the 2.6.17-1.2157_FC5 linux kernel), I cannot access multiple samba shares that have share-level security using cifs. 0. To reproduce, use a server that serves two shares with share-level security. Make sure the shares have different passwords. 1. Using the standard mount command and specifying cifs

Probably a very know problem but I fail to find a solution. selinux enforced makes the /etc/init.d/dovecot start command fail If I change it to permiscious mode then it works. Any idea how to solve this? I use FC5 with dovecot-1.0-0.beta2.7 Thanks, Alfred

Hi all, This is my first experience with network file sharing on Linux so I'm looking for debugging advice. Server and client are both running FC5. I've set up my home directory as a share on the server using system-config-samba, everything seems fine. On the client side, as root: # smbclient -L server.domain Password: Domain=[DOMAIN] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23a-1.fc4.1]

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (4): ================================================= 1) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network doesn''t work. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=840 2)time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=895 You

I am looking for help install the x86_64 R Binary onto my FC5 machine. At the risk of subjecting myself to tons of criticism, I must confess that I don't know anything about Linux and I have never compiled R from source. Therefore, I choose FC5 because I see that a 64-bit binary is already available. Here is what I tried: I installed FC5 with all options (productivity, software development,

New issues (0) ================================================= No new issue. Old issues (3): ================================================= 1).time latency is a negative number on window guest when vcpu > 1 http://losvmm-bridge.sh.intel.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 You can reproduce it on SMP windows, it will not happen on UP Windows 2) IA32E/PAE: 32bit Vista RTM network

Hello, I am a biostats student and a newbie to R. I have a question about 32-bit vs. 64-bit. I am running FC5 on a AMD 3800+ with 2GB Ram. With 64-bit, I am running into some issues the stability of FC5. A friend suggested I ditch the 64-bit version of FC5 for the 32-bit. I do not currently have any pressing needs for the capabilities of the 64-bit OS. Before I reinstall the 32-bit

Hi List; I think my problem in Zaptel compilation is related to autoconf: no input file, anyone has an advise? Also, I did a change in the Makefile existed in the following path: /usr/src/kernels/2.6.20-1.2319.fc5-i686/ EXTRAVERSION = 2.6.20-1.2319.fc5 Now, if I run uname -r then I get output: 2.6.20-1.2319.fc5 But the directory under the kernels is: 2.6.20-1.2319.fc5-i686 So do I have to

While trying to compile zaptel 1.2.8 on a FC5 I get the following error: /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5smp/build make -C /lib/modules/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5smp/build SUBDIRS=/usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8 modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.19-1.2288.fc5-smp-i686' CC [M] /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8/zaptel.o In file included from /usr/src/zaptel-1.2.8/zaptel.c:40:

Seeing Fedora have released 1.5.0.3 for fc5 isn't it time for CentOS to rebuild 1.5.0.3 for CentOSPlus or does the current rpm have the patches? I recall last times goof in FC5 firefox appearing in the CentOS one so I assume that CentOSPlus needs to rebuild the FC5 one again. __________________________________________________ Improve the mailing list by performing a simple search before

Hello, we run samba 3.0.14a on FreeBSD. We recently upgraded our linux clients from FC2 to FC5. Now smbpasswd (on the client) does not work. We get the following error: "cli_pipe_validate_current_pdu: RPC fault code NT code 0x1c010002 received from remote machine sambaserver pipe \samr fnum 0x70f3! machine sambaserver rejected the password change: Error was : NT code 0x1c010002. Failed

Are there any generic install guidelines for compiling the Zaptel drivers on FC5? This is my first install of Asterisk (and my first FC5 system) and I'm having a great deal of trouble getting it to cooperate. make clean and make are definitely not playing nice, telling me that "You don't appear to have the kernel sources installed" when I'm pretty sure that I do. Any

Hello! I've read various information on the web, including the HOWTO on how to configure Printers, but I am struggling with making my printers publicly printable. My samba server is joined to a W2K3 domain. How do I configure it to be printable by anyone, even a user/system not part of the domain? Here is my current config: [printers] comment = All Printers path =

If I try to ifup eth0, I get the following: Device eth0 does not seem to be present, delaying initialization. DomU: Linux fedora1 2.6.16-1.2133_FC5xenU #1 SMP Tue Jun 6 02:58:27 EDT 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux config: kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6-xenU" #ramdisk="/boot/initrd-2.6.16-1.2133_FC5xenU.img" memory = 128 name = "fedora1" #dhcp = "dhcp" disk =

I copied exactly where Axel provided into atrmps.repo. I have the line: atrpms.repo:baseurl=http://dl.atrpms.net/el5-x86_64/atrpms/stable but the rpms that are being flagged as updates pretty much all have fc5 in their names. e.g.: ---> Package mplayer-fonts.noarch 4:1.0-7.at set to be updated ---> Package mplayer.i386 4:1.0-60_r23482.fc5 set to be updated ---> Package

Hi All, I have just installed xen on fedora core 5. I used yum to install xen and kernel-xen0 (and their dependancies) I can reboot into the new domain0 without issue. When I try and configure a new domain using xenguest-install.py it gets to the point of wanting to install, and then fails. I have mounted the Fedora Core 5 DVD on /var/www/html/fc5 and the webserver is running, and it is also