similar to: group membership issue?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "group membership issue?"

2006 Aug 29
1
member server can't authenticate users?
Hey List- I've got 2 samba servers. PDC: FreeBSD 5.4; samba: 3.0.23 ? name: bugs member server: FreeBSD 6-stable; samba: 3.0.23 ? name: daffy note: config files are at the bottom of the email The PDC was running an older version, but I just upgraded and it didn't fix the below issue. The member server was running fine with the old smb.conf file, but I rebuilt the server and now it
2015 Feb 25
3
samba4 domain member and multiple domains
Hello. I've got a samba4 domain member server. It works fine for the joined domain, but I'm not able to let user from a different domain get access. This worked fine on my samba3 member server, but I don't remember if I did anything special. I do have authentication set on the AD object for the users in question and we have a one-way trust with the other domain. All DCs are Windows
2008 Sep 30
1
wpi driver freeze on boot
I've got a HP dv8000 laptop. Setting up the wpi driver for wireless freezes the system on boot with the following error: wpi0 requested unsupported memory range wpi0: could not allocate memory resource It lists a pcbi device (pcbi4 i think) and an actual memory range, but since I have to reboot using kernel.old the /var/run/dmesg.boot is wiped with the info. Is there anyway to grab the
2007 Sep 20
1
wierd permissions issue
Hey List- Okay, I've got a 2003 AD Server which has all the office users setup, groups, etc... I have a FreeBSD apache development box with a couple of shares on it for devels to use. This devel box also has proftpd authentication external domain users via PAM. The issue I was having is that the FTP users could login, but they couldn't write or create files. The permissions were
2019 Apr 26
0
[PATCH 06/10] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area for any communication with the hypervisor. This patch addresses the most basic stuff (mostly what is required for virtio-ccw), and does take care of QDIO or any devices. An interesting side effect is that virtio structures are now going to get allocated in 31 bit addressable storage. Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic at
2019 May 23
0
[PATCH v2 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area for any communication with the hypervisor. It handles neither QDIO in the common code, nor any device type specific stuff (like channel programs constructed by the DASD driver). An interesting side effect is that virtio structures are now going to get allocated in 31 bit
2019 May 29
0
[PATCH v3 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area for any communication with the hypervisor. It handles neither QDIO in the common code, nor any device type specific stuff (like channel programs constructed by the DASD driver). An interesting side effect is that virtio structures are now going to get allocated in 31 bit
2019 Jun 12
0
[PATCH v5 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area within the common I/O layer for any communication with the hypervisor. Note that we do not need to use that area for control blocks directly referenced by instructions, e.g. the orb. It handles neither QDIO in the common code, nor any device type specific stuff (like channel programs constructed by the DASD driver). An
2019 Apr 10
0
[RFC PATCH 05/12] s390/cio: add protected virtualization support to cio
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:02:25 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:25:57 +0200 > Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> wrote: > > So, what is a high-level summary of areas that need the treatment? > > What I get from looking at the patches so far, it's: > > - stuff that is written by the hypervisor's interrupt
2015 Feb 19
4
Excel and Samba Problem
ok.. and you did also a .. chmod -R 2770 /path/to/dir The folder you are share-ing also needs 2770 >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: Oliver Werner [mailto:oliver.werner at kontrast.de] >Verzonden: donderdag 19 februari 2015 13:45 >Aan: L.P.H. van Belle >CC: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Excel and Samba Problem > >I have try it but does not
2013 Oct 18
2
Login into other user's account // master user for non-master users // chroot to users.<user>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Currently some of our organizational roles uses shared secrets (aka the password) to access the mail account of an organizational role, say "sales" for example. For one, I don't like shared secrets, for second, there had been some changes to shared mailboxes, I can only say "user sales has deleted the message at then and
2009 Aug 14
4
Redirecting mail gives 'mail forwarding loop' to the sender - calling for sieve help
Greetings, i am testing: - dovecot-1.2-sieve-0.1.11 - dovecot 1.2.3 - dovecot-1.2-managesieve-0.11.8 (with patch) I am trying to use sieve_after to execute some redirection of mails. I have put in the after script: require "include"; require "fileinto"; if header :contains ["To","Cc"] "userA at acasalud.com.ar" { keep; redirect
2016 Feb 10
2
Accessing to mail as another user
El 09/02/16 a las 13:44, Matthias Fechner escribi?: > > do you maybe mean shared mailboxes: > http://wiki.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes > I don't want shared mailboxes. I have to access the other mailbox as a complete separate account from my personal one. I think I can achive this with master user, but I need to found a way to configure permissions so the real user has access
2008 May 13
1
cannot get calls with Tellfree brazilian provider
Hi, I'm making some tests with Tellfree brazilian provider. I'm using 2 users A and B, one for calling and the other to receive calls. When I make a call I can see (from the CLI console) user A is calling user B but user B does not answer (the phone continues to ring) even if the "sip show registry" command says user B is registered. In my sip.conf I have: register =>
2003 Dec 02
2
users home directorys
Hi All, Is it possible for different users to sync their home directory's (which reside on the same server) using rsync. By that I mean that usera will using rsync to sync /home/usera and userb will sync /home/userb on the same server but usera will not have access to /home/userb. I hope I am making sense. I do not want to use ssh, just rsync. I have RTFMs but they did not answer my question.
2002 May 10
3
Unix Group Question with repect to Samba
I have a question with regards to using Unix groups with samba. This might be easier to explain with an example. Lets say I have two users UserID: GID UserA:Group1 UserB:Group2 etc..... I now have an entry in /etc/group that looks like groupdev::UserA, UserB If I have a directory with group ownership set to "groupdev" and group mode "rws" UserA & UserB cannot create a
2010 Mar 04
1
INBOX of a shared namespace appears to be always subscribed
In dovecot 1.2.10 I run into the following problem: Our users are entitled to share their personal mailboxes. This works. But if user A shares any of its mailboxes with user B, then dovecot always reports the INBOX of user A as subscribed by user B. No matter whether user B really subscribed the INBOX of A, or whether user A permitted user B the access to its INBOX. The problem is caused
2015 Feb 19
4
Excel and Samba Problem
Hello, We have a problem with our Samba server (we tested with two versions 3.6.6 and 4.1.11). When a User edit an Excel file and saves, another user can not save this edited later. The temporary file named like 885E9010 will be created and Excel reports that this file can not be accessed. I have test it with Windows and Mac. Both have the same Problem. This is our samba configuration:
2007 Jul 16
1
[Asterisk]Asterisk's behavior of a simple call
Hello, I tried to configure a very simple case of Asterisk using SIP userA --- Asterisk server ---- userB sip.conf [userA] type=friend username=userA host=dynamic nat=no context=test [userB] type=friend username=userB host=dynamic nat=no context=test In extensions.conf [test] exten => 1000,1,Dial(SIP/userA) exten => 2000,1,Dial(SIP/userB) I make a call from userA to userB, it works,
2010 Jul 05
1
SIP response 482 "Loop Detected"
Hi, We have tried upgrading from 1.6.1.14 to 1.6.2.9 and have found that we are unable to URI dial our clients. We run a multi-tenant server and have set sip.conf to forward calls to a public context based on incoming domain name. This was all working before but not it is complaining of a loop back as the source and target server are the same. Any ideas on how to overcome this problem as we dial