similar to: 3.0.23b -> 3.0.23c

I have 2 machines with redhat-8.0 I made a control, and the PC's told me that rsync was installed on both ( I tried to install again the rpm before I get the messages ) I have rsh on both machines to but I could just activate on one of them, my dhcpd server. I made a ping -c 4 to my client it's works. when I try to execute this sentence, I get the following message. > [root@pc02

Hi All, I'd like to add HLE support in LLVM/clang consistent to GCC's style [1]. HLE from Intel TSX [2] is legacy compatible instruction set extension to specify transactional region by adding XACQUIRE and XRELEASE prefixes. To support that, GCC chooses the approach by extending the memory order flag in __atomic_* builtins with target-specific memory model in high bits (bit 31-16 for

Here is the patch 0003-Add-XACQ-XREL-prefix-and-encoding-asm-printer-suppor.patch Yours - Michael On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:07 -0800, Michael Liao wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to add HLE support in LLVM/clang consistent to GCC's style [1]. > HLE from Intel TSX [2] is legacy compatible instruction set extension to > specify transactional region by adding XACQUIRE and

Hi. I've got Samba 3.0 on a Linux FC2 machine, and Windows XP on another machine. When trying to access from Windows to Linux through 'fooworkgroup', I get this error message: "foogroup is not accessible. You might not have permission to use this network resource. Contact the administrator of this server to find out if you have access permissions. The list of servers for this

Hi All, I'd like to add HLE support in LLVM/clang consistent to GCC's style [1]. HLE from Intel TSX [2] is legacy compatible instruction set extension to specify transactional region by adding XACQUIRE and XRELEASE prefixes. To support that, GCC chooses the approach by extending the memory order flag in __atomic_* builtins with target-specific memory model in high bits (bit 31-16 for

Hello all, I'm running samba3 as domain controller. I have upgraded samba from 3.0.22 to 3.0.23b and faced an issue with groups display: samba does not see any groups. "net rpc group -U Administrator" returns empty set. usrmgr.exe does not show any groups also. Groups are present in ldap, nss_ldap works fine: # id asv uid=2005(asv) gid=513(Domain Users) groups=513(Domain Users),

Hi, i want to make a vpn between two windows machine. It works only in SWITCH mode but not in ROUTER mode. What's mistake ? PC01: tinc.conf name=pc01 interface=vpn000 mode=switch connectto=ns7 hosts\ns7 address=xx.149.195.15 netmask=11.10.0.0/24 address=62.149.195.15 netmask=11.10.0.0/24 -----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY----- MIGJAoGBAOSS48u53oNsq2B2a67oFz5zdzf18vwykY0VgGvu7UL4gI6Y49+cCdIu

Hi Michael, Why do you want to add transactional memory support to LLVM ? Can't you implement transactional memory using a library call ? Judging by the number of patches it looks like a major change to LLVM, and I am not sure that I understand the motivation for including it in LLVM. Thanks, Nadav On Feb 19, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Michael Liao <michael.liao at intel.com> wrote:

I portupgraded my samba domain server and domain member to 3.0.23b from 3.0.23 and found that the domain member was not accessible from workstations. The error message: \\HOSTNAME is not accessible. There are currently no logon servers available to service the logon request. In the log.winbindd of the domain member, I found: [2006/08/23 22:52:00, 0] nsswitch/winbindd.c:request_len_recv(517)

I installed a PDC some days ago for some 15 users/PCs (w98,2000,xp), with samba 3.0.23b-1 and valid users wasn't working. I'm going to update to 3.0.23c which solves that problem. I'm using smbpasswd passdb backend. In /etc/group I have only two groups. I don't understand very well the changes related to primaryGroupSID and RID commented in previous posts. Please, is it

Hi, I am trying to compile "iproute2" (iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss020116-try.tar.gz, inclusively the latest HTB patch, activated diffserv components) on a SuSE-Linux 8.2 system (using "gcc 3.3", system based on "glibc 2.3.2"). It is no problem as long as I use the kernel header files of linux-2.4.20 (vanilla), linux-2.4.20.SuSE (special kernel patched by SuSE, shipped

Hello. I have a Folder /shares/Public/ which is shared. The Account "general" should have a separate HomeDir below /shares/Public/general depending on the machine name. So I set the attribute homeDirectory in LDAP to /shares/Public/general/%m (i also tried %M). But when I log on at PC01, the HomeDir is not mounted, because %m/%M was not resolved to the machinename: >

-----Original Message----- From: M. D. Parker [mailto:mike.parker@ga.com] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 9:02 AM To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' Subject: HELP -- Problem with access list on samba 3.0.23b but not on 3.0.20c PDC I am using samba with NO windbind and a configuration file that has worked for years stopped working at 3.0.23b. The affect was that my [netlogon] area was not being

Hi All, I'm trying to integrate Samba 4 DHCPD and Bind 9.9 into a complete solution. I'm using the BIND/Samba 4 DLZ plugin. DHCP by itself works and hands out IP addresses. What I would like to have happen is the following: - PC is joined to the Samba 4 domain (this works) - PC gets an IP via DHCPD - DHCP or the PC registers the IP in BIND Network PC's should resolve cleanly when

Here is the patch 0004-Enable-HLE-code-generation.patch Yours - Michael On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:07 -0800, Michael Liao wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to add HLE support in LLVM/clang consistent to GCC's style [1]. > HLE from Intel TSX [2] is legacy compatible instruction set extension to > specify transactional region by adding XACQUIRE and XRELEASE prefixes. > To

Here is the patch 0002-Add-HLE-target-feature.patch Yours - Michael On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:07 -0800, Michael Liao wrote: > Hi All, > > I'd like to add HLE support in LLVM/clang consistent to GCC's style [1]. > HLE from Intel TSX [2] is legacy compatible instruction set extension to > specify transactional region by adding XACQUIRE and XRELEASE prefixes. > To support

i'm using samba 2.2.5 and mandrake 8.5 as a pdc for test. Whenever i create a trust account PC123$ for a machine to login it appears as user in the KDE interface, i know its not samba specific but if i have 100 users thats a lot of $ users on the login list!

Yesterday evening I upgraded my FreeBSD 5.5-RELEASE Server from Samba 3.0.22 to 3.0.23. This gave me a LOT of work today... :-( This is what I found so far: My Samba-Server is member of a large ADS-Domain. After the upgrade, file based Usermapping didn't work anymore... better: it worked TWICE. (I once opened a PR for that a few years ago :-). So, with LogLevel 3:

I have a file server running with Samba over Debian Sarge 3.1 R1. This File server store MDB and XLS files. Could anybody give me an optimal setup for my samba server (smb.conf). Actually, the performance is very poor. [global] workgroup = REVLON netbios name = FILE_SRV security = user encrypt passwords = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u unix password sync = yes socket options =

Hi, Cannot spot the debian binaries for 3.0.23b - please please please as 3.0.23a has some issues regarding domain users and I'm too lazy to compile my own packages Thanks, -- DanB