similar to: Printing problem with samba 3.0.23c and windows NT4 (URGENT)

Hi, I upgraded my samba 3.0.21b to 3.0.23c, after that printing from this NT 4 workstation don't work ! I have : [2006/09/06 09:01:44, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2332) call_nt_transact_ioctl(0x90028): Currently not implemented. And on the workstation : write error on \\admin01\promatic for that document : name file syntax, direcrory or

I found other problem in error log (samba -i -d 3) GSS server Update(krb5)(1) Update failed: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Failed to find ADMIN01$@CORMANDOM.INT-CORMAN.BE(kvno 3) in keytab FILE:/srv/samba/private/secrets.keytab (arcfour-hmac-md5) I sent a bug for my problems. best regards St?phane ----------------------------------- St?phane PURNELLE Admin.

Hi, I try to use nslcd with samba 4 for get suers and group for AD. if I do a ldapsearch, I have a message : Server not in kerberos database if I do a getent passwd, nslcd display same error message. log of samba4: [2013/08/28 10:15:47, 3] ../source4/auth/kerberos/krb5_init_context.c:80(smb_krb5_debug_wrapper) Kerberos: TGS-REQ Administrator at CORMANDOM.INT-CORMAN.BE from

Hi Samba team. I installed on a new server samba 3.2.0. And all work fine, except the reload-config command and other things. For resolve some missed-configuration, I modify the smb.conf and call smbcontrol <smbd_pid> reload-config, but it's not work. Ex : I added mdfs root = yes (same as samba 3.0.x), after I called smbcontrol xxxx reload-config [2008/07/28 00:17:34, 3]

Hi, I have problem with GPO and dns/kerberos resolution I do a samba -i -d3 to a log file and started on client: gpupdate /force: lpcfg_load: refreshing parameters from /srv/samba/etc/smb.conf params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/srv/samba/etc/smb.conf" samba version 4.1.0rc2 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2013 ... ldb_wrap open of

Hi all, I have a strange problem : smb.conf : [global] netbios name = CORLI01 workgroup = CORMAN server string = Ancien Serveur administratif (%v) # Definition de la securite #security = user security = domain password server = ADMIN01 # passwd chat debug = yes # passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n

Hi, I have problem with GPO and dns/kerberos resolution I do a samba -i -d3 to a log file and started on client: gpupdate /force: lpcfg_load: refreshing parameters from /srv/samba/etc/smb.conf params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/srv/samba/etc/smb.conf" samba version 4.1.0rc2 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2013 ... ldb_wrap open of

Hi, I have problem with GPO and dns/kerberos resolution I do a samba -i -d3 to a log file and started on client: gpupdate /force: lpcfg_load: refreshing parameters from /srv/samba/etc/smb.conf params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/srv/samba/etc/smb.conf" samba version 4.1.0rc2 started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2013 GENSEC backend

I have the problem with smbclient -L ... This is a level 50 debug message [2004/02/23 10:45:00, 5] lib/debug.c:debug_dump_status(359) INFO: Current debug levels: all: True/50 tdb: False/0 printdrivers: False/0 lanman: False/0 smb: False/0 rpc_parse: False/0 rpc_srv: False/0 rpc_cli: False/0 passdb: False/0 sam: False/0 auth: False/0 winbind:

Hi, during I make a some du command (du -sh), samba has been disturb and sent a panic action : Last line of smbd.log : [2008/07/30 15:36:09, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(709) ERROR: string overflow by 1 (16 - 15) in safe_strcpy [10.217.7.3/255.255.252.0] [2008/07/30 16:04:43, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(709) ERROR: string overflow by 1 (16 - 15) in safe_strcpy

What's means, can I have some problem with this configuration ? Or it's just a speed problem ? St?phane John H Terpstra

damn.... now everything works samba recognises user "test_user" in group "users" AND "kids".... i dunno why ?!?!!? i did nothing, i just removed "valid users" from this share and reloaded smb-conf...nothing special ! if i could reproduce it, it would be better then seeing it working now and not knowing why.... but thx very much for your patiance greez

I am not sure, I would check however the hardware failed yesterday evening! CUPS I believe. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: > samba-bounces+david.ellison=atkinsglobal.com@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-bounces+david.ellison=atkinsglobal.com@lists.sam > ba.org] On Behalf Of stephane.purnelle@corman.be > Sent: 31 January 2007 11:27 > To: samba@lists.samba.org

Hi, 1 I got message "The specified network name is no longer = available" show on PC/Win2000 when copy large files to ARM9 base = NAS(with SAMBA 2.2.8 + Linux Kennel 2.4.18) file size is correct but content appended with all "0" in = ARM9 NAS HDD. 2. At the console of ARM9 NAS show : ..... root@sword:/var# . smbd[170]: PAM

Hi, I created a share with a dot. ["corman.pub"] comment = corman.pub path = /rsrv/data1/corman.pub read only = No inherit permissions = Yes inherit acls = Yes testparm says "no problem", but when i try to acces to this share, I have a window wessage : "could not find network name " and in the log : [2003/10/31 12:08:50, 0]

If the first LDAP server faild, the second can be used directly. This server is a PDC server with more than 100 people connected and some application required domain authentification for running. For me is a critical server. ----------------------------------- St?phane PURNELLE stephane.purnelle@corman.be Service Informatique Corman S.A. Tel : 00 32

Hi, I have some problem with computer browser and Net Logon. I suspect the MS-patches named MS06-40 (921883). http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-040.mspx Could anyone confim if this patches couse problem or not. Actually I use samba 3.0.21c and I would like to know if samba 3.0.23c could resolve problem. thanks St?phane Purnelle

Extract of smb.conf : valid users (S) This is a list of users that should be allowed to login to this service. Names starting with '@', '+' and '&' are interpreted using the same rules as described in the invalid users parameter. If this is empty (the default) then any user can login. If a username is in both this list and the invalid

The origine of my message is a problem with my local LDAP server. last thursday I upgraded my RH 8 with the glibc update from RedHAt, after sometimes the LDAP server is unreachable. In log : Mar 2 11:40:02 coradm01 slapd[5342]: warning: cannot open /etc/hosts.allow: Too many open files Mar 2 11:40:02 coradm01 slapd[5342]: warning: cannot open /etc/hosts.deny: Too many open files Mar 2 11:40:02

Hi, I have a samba server which act as file/print/wins server and PDC with ldap backend & ACL support (samba-3.0.23). I plan to start a new server which replace the old one. My question is about the samba version, my first advice is the use samba-3.0.28a. But maybe is preferable to wait samba 3.2.0. What type of bugs samba-3.0.28a have ? The new sever will act as samba/print server and