similar to: AD logins using winbind looking for user in /etc/shadow

Hi, I'm attempting to configure Samba 3.5 to authenticate share access via Active Directory. I do not wish to authenticate system users against AD, only Samba shares. I have successfully joined the server to the AD domain, with a few errors: $ net join -W buildel664 -U jbadmin Enter jbadmin's password: Using short domain name -- NA Joined 'BUILDEL664' to realm

ok here's the situation; i've done this on 7 servers same either SLES 9 or 10, and all those work. i have a problem server though which is SLES v9 (same versions of all daemons/services that would be used) and this one just wont allow AD auth to work i can restart all smb, nmb, winbind, and ssh servers with no errors *Note: all the needed configuratoin file snippets are at the end of

Forgot to mention that this is on Centos 8. So maybe something different than this: https://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg163085.html Regards Christian Am 16.04.20 um 13:45 schrieb Christian Naumer via samba: > Hello alAl, > after update of our test server to 4.12.1 from 4.11 it crashes. If the > vfs module is removed from the config everthing works as before. Logs > from the

Hello alAl, after update of our test server to 4.12.1 from 4.11 it crashes. If the vfs module is removed from the config everthing works as before. Logs from the crash see here: .0.31:445] Apr 16 13:36:47 lx-sv-03 smbd_audit[6263]: [2020/04/16 13:36:47.546559, 0] ../../source3/lib/util.c:830(smb_panic_s3) Apr 16 13:36:47 lx-sv-03 smbd_audit[6263]: PANIC (pid 6263): vfs_full_audit.c: name table

Hey listers, I am trying to do something simple... Check the program below... I would like to create a variable named COLOR according to the conditions that I stablished... But the problem is that it seems that my variable COLOR is checking just on sample, may be last in the loop... Certainly, I am missing something... Thanks in advance, Marcio

Hi, I'm trying to call a SIP server while providing the SIP server username/password in dial string but it's not working ... Dial(SIP/gs102:test at 192.168.2.81); User on sip server (192.168.2.81): [gs102] disallow=all allow=ulaw allow=alaw type=friend username=gs102 secret=test host=dynamic dtmfmode=inband defaultip=192.168.2.1 qualify=1000 mailbox=102 context=context-gs102

================================================================ "You can''t have everything. Where would you put it? Steven Wright ================================================================ Release Announcements ===================== This is a maintenance release of the Samba 3.2 series. Major enhancements in 3.2.11 include: o Fix domain logins for WinXP

================================================================ "You can''t have everything. Where would you put it? Steven Wright ================================================================ Release Announcements ===================== This is a maintenance release of the Samba 3.2 series. Major enhancements in 3.2.11 include: o Fix domain logins for WinXP

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0431 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0431.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-29.RHEL3.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -------------- next part -------------- A non-text

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0431 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0431.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-29.RHEL3.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-29.RHEL3.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:0431 shadow-utils security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0431.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-29.RHEL3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-29.RHEL3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:0431 shadow-utils security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0431.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-29.RHEL3.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-29.RHEL3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0276 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0276.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-61.RHEL4.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored -------------- next part -------------- A non-text

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0276 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0276.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-61.RHEL4.s390.rpm s390x: updates/s390x/RPMS/shadow-utils-4.0.3-61.RHEL4.s390x.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - upi at iki.fi - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2005:842 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-842.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: shadow-utils-4.0.3-58.RHEL4.i386.rpm src: shadow-utils-4.0.3-58.RHEL4.src.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2005:842 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-842.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: shadow-utils-4.0.3-58.RHEL4.x86_64.rpm src: shadow-utils-4.0.3-58.RHEL4.src.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

I am by no means an expert along these lines, but should the following small program lock out (for 60 seconds) elements of the shadow suit such as chsh ?? ------------------------ #include <stdlib.h> #include <shadow.h> void main() { if(lckpwdf()) { printf("Failed to get password locks\n"); exit(0); }

There is this * in the password field of the shadow file for certain accounts. I know that the ! is to indicate a locked account but what does a * mean? man 5 shadow does not reveal anything.

Shadow audit: paging-disabled shadows no longer need special treatment when translating the frame numbers found in the entries. multi.c | 31 +++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) Signed-off-by: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com> -- Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com> Principal Software Engineer, Citrix Systems (R&D) Ltd. [Company

Hello all, I have a CentOS 4.2 server that gives me these error messages in my /var/log/secure file, I realise that these are SSH attacks, but where does the extra line "Could not get shadow information for NOUSER" come from? This doesn't make any sense. I have many servers running CentOS 4.2, but don't get this error message on any others. I hate junk in my logs. Is there